Connect with us

Business

Why Trump’s attacks on free speech should alarm all Americans, not just his latest targets

Published

on



In Russia, Vladimir Putin will throw protestors against the war in Ukraine in prison. The Chinese Communist Party will send dissidents to reeducation camps. It makes you thankful we live in the U.S.A., where we proudly celebrate our right to free speech, including the right to tell the government to go to hell. Right?

Except on March 9, the Trump administration arrested and briefly disappeared Mahmoud Khalil because they disapprove of his protests against Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza. He was transferred to a remote, privately run Louisiana detention facility in the middle of the night and remains locked up. If you cut through the loose accusations, the White House justification for detaining and seeking to deport a green card holder, whose U.S. citizen wife is expecting their baby in a month, is that the administration disapproves of his views on Middle East politics.

And this case is no outlier. It was a canary in the coal mine of further attempted deportations. Rümeysa Öztürk, a PhD student at Tufts, was recently accosted and taken off the street by armed, masked, unnamed men. Her transgression was apparently co-authoring an op-ed in the student newspaper the previous year about the university’s handling of student protests.

Her attempted deportation is simply the latest example of the Trump administration taking a sledgehammer to free speech and using the federal government to enforce compliance with government-sanctioned views.

Lest we forget, the White House banned the Associated Press from the White House press pool in February for failing to use the president’s preferred language to describe the body of water south of Louisiana. And their colleagues at CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS and NPR—broadcasters that President Trump has attacked—have had the Federal Communications Commission announce investigations into them.

The attacks on free speech started on President Trump’s very first day in office. Among other things, Trump ordered that retired four-star General Mark Milley be stripped of his security detail—which was in place due to threats to his life from a foreign government—along with his portrait and potentially a star, after Milley called Trump unfit for office. General Milley gave 43 years of his life to service of his country in the U.S. Army, rising to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. This decision was not predicated on an assessment of the security risks Milley faced. It was punishment for Milley’s political views.

Soon after, the Trump administration stripped security clearances from the lawyers for former special counsel Jack Smith. Trump has issued executive orders intending to hobble the ability of two major law firms to do business, based on the clients they have chosen to represent in the past.

Let’s be very clear: The First Amendment prevents the government from restricting our speech because they don’t like what we’re saying. And because of this, the administration should lose a lot in court as these actions are challenged, as they have frequently lost so far.

But prevailing in any given assault on political opponents is not the Trump admin’s objective. The point of these attacks is to show that if you oppose Trump and his goals, the government will try to destroy you. The government doesn’t have to prevail in court to land a devastating blow on the people and organizations it targets for their speech or political positions. Workers can lose jobs, businesses can lose clients, universities can see federal grants frozen, legal fees can stack up, and people can be hauled out of their homes away from their families by anonymous armed officers without cause or explanation. Prevailing later in court doesn’t soften the blow of those experiences.

Make no mistake: The targets of these actions are not only Mahmoud Khalil and Mark Milley and some big law firms and the Associated Press. We are all the targets.  

The point of targeting the Trump admin’s opponents is to show everyone else that the pragmatic course is to keep our heads down. It’s to coerce cooperation, enforce silence, and suppress opposition. We can win court battles and yet lose the war for our freedoms if people and organizations feel compelled to stay silent, change their behaviors, and self-censor because the risk of doing otherwise is too high.

It’s already happening. Even before Jan. 20, corporate America was bending over backwards to get on the president-elect’s good side. As Trump has said, “The first term everybody was fighting me. This term everybody wants to be my friend.” Meta paid $25 million to Trump’s presidential library fund to settle a lawsuit widely considered to be frivolous. Universities are canceling programs and scrubbing websites. Pro bono litigators are reporting hesitation from large law firms to join cases against the government for fear of drawing presidential ire. A senior staff person at a major civil rights nonprofit told me their board was questioning strategy for fear of drawing administration attacks.  

That’s why, as crucial and heroic as the actions are of those who win legal victories against a lawbreaking administration, defending the First Amendment cannot be left to lawyers in the courtroom. Saving our right to speak freely and organize around our beliefs, even when the current administration may not like it, is a responsibility we all share.  

We can disagree with each other in the political arena and even despise the positions others take, but we have to stand up for each other’s First Amendment rights because if the government gets to censor others, they can censor us too. That’s why we—especially United States citizens who don’t face nearly the same newfound dangers as visa or green card holders—need to demand that business leaders, university presidents, heads of organizations, and elected officials push back when the government is weaponized against the exercise of First Amendment rights. If we don’t, we’re all next in line.  

The First Amendment is the bulwark of our freedom. There is no place for one man to tell us what we can or can’t say. That’s what this country was built on, and it’s worth fighting for.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Read more:

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

I’ve spent decades building tech that changes how we work. Here’s why AI agents won’t take your job

Published

on



I’ve been around long enough to see every major shift in workplace technology spark the same reaction: panic.

I saw it when we moved work to the cloud. When we started using AI in search and knowledge discovery. When we replaced spreadsheets with shared docs. And now, with the rise of AI agents, I’m seeing it again.

The question always comes fast: Will this technology take my job?

Here’s my answer for today’s version of this existential question: AI agents won’t replace you. But someone using them might.

That’s not a threat—it’s a wake-up call. Because this generation of AI isn’t about automation. It’s about amplification and impact.

Meet the new MVP of work: The AI glue guy

To explain what I mean, let me borrow an analogy from sports. I’ve long admired athletes like former NBA swingman Andre Iguodala—those who don’t lead the league in stats but are absolutely essential to their teams. They rebound. They defend. They communicate. They make the players around them better. That’s why Iggy was named the NBA Finals MVP in 2015—he did the gritty, overlooked work that held the Warriors together.

In basketball, they call that kind of player the “glue guy.”

That’s what AI agents are at work. They’re the glue guys of the modern team—not the stars, but the silent difference-makers. They fill in the gaps. They keep everything connected. They help people accomplish their work faster, more accurately, and better.

Take one of the companies my team at GrowthLoop recently partnered with—Allegro, widely considered the “Amazon of Eastern Europe.” It’s using a tool of ours that’s powered by agentic AI and sits on top of its data cloud. Instead of jumping between disconnected tools, its marketers now work alongside a team of specialized AI agents: one understands data, another builds optimized journeys, others surface insights, suggest audiences, and brainstorm campaign ideas.

All of it happens from a single interface, like a command center for modern marketing. The agents don’t replace the humans—they empower them. The result? A 2X lift in return on ad spend. A 60% jump in gross merchandise value. A nearly 70% drop in cost per click.

That’s not job replacement. That’s job transformation.

And the best part? It’s just getting started.

We’ve seen this dynamic play out before. At my previous company, we introduced Glean—a tool I helped launch that transformed how teams discover knowledge inside their companies—and it was the same story. People feared overload. But what they found was a faster path to the right information, and more time for real problem-solving. That’s the story of every major breakthrough in tech: first, fear. Then, productivity. Then, progress.

What makes AI agents feel different is how fast they’re evolving. These models don’t just automate left-brain tasks like math and scheduling anymore. They now handle right-brain tasks—creativity, language, strategy. But the real breakthrough is their ability to reason in real time and personalize results. These agents aren’t just tools—they’re strategic partners. They process data faster than any human, spot patterns we’d miss, and suggest options we might never consider.

We’ve already seen this shift across industries. Developers are using AI to generate code and spot bugs faster. Customer support teams are delivering personalized answers in seconds because agents are stitching together past interactions in the background. Creative teams are testing and iterating on campaigns without waiting weeks for results.

None of this makes AI scary or removes the need for humans. It eliminates the drudgery.

Look inside any large company and you’ll find a mountain of work that’s pure busywork. Layers of reporting, status updates, and manual coordination consume massive amounts of time—what Asana’s Anatomy of Work Index calls “work about work,” which eats up to 60% of a person’s day. All of those hours add up to huge amounts of lost time. It’s modern-day “TPS reports” (from Office Space) on repeat. But AI agents change that. Imagine if, for every project, a crisp three-bullet summary was auto-generated and shared weekly—no chasing, no compiling. Now your product manager can spend time with customers, not decks. Your marketing lead can focus on creative, not cobbling data from five tools. These agents aren’t stealing jobs; they’re freeing people to do the work that actually matters.

Are some jobs going to change? Absolutely. But show me an era when they didn’t. The top jobs today didn’t even exist 20 years ago. Prompt engineer. Data strategist. AI agent supervisor. There’s a whole new category of work emerging around how we guide, govern, and collaborate with these systems.

It’s easy to feel overwhelmed, especially with how fast things are moving. But speed doesn’t have to mean chaos. In fact, AI agents can help tame the chaos, especially for companies buried under decades of siloed data, legacy tools, and fragmented workflows. They’re the connective tissue, the missing link. The glue.

And here’s the thing about glue guys: They don’t ask for the spotlight. They just make the team better.

The future of work is a team sport

If you’re a leader reading this, I encourage you to start getting familiar with new technology where humans and agents collaborate, much the same way as human teams do today. Ask yourself what are the low-value, repetitive tasks that no one likes doing.

The workforce is more adaptable than we give it credit for. History shows that when people are given new tools, they find new ways to work. The same will happen here. We’ll invent jobs we haven’t thought of yet. We’ll solve problems we once considered unsolvable. We’ll build teams where everyone, human or agent, plays to their strengths.

If I had 10 seconds in front of every employee at a Fortune 500 company, here’s what I’d say: You’re not going to lose your job to AI agents. You’re going to lose it to someone who knows how to collaborate with them really well. So embrace it. Learn it. Use it to make your work better—and more human. There’s no bounds to human ingenuity.  Agents will help reduce the distance from idea to impact.

Because in this new era of work, the most powerful move you can make is to play like a team. And your team will only benefit from having glue guys.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Read more:

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

IRS to lose billions in revenue if migrants stop filing taxes

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service is projected to lose more than $313 billion in revenue in the coming decade as undocumented workers are poised to pay fewer taxes after the agency struck a deal to share data with U.S. immigration authorities.

The IRS is expected to lose $12 billion in revenue for the remainder of the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, according to a report out Tuesday by the Yale Budget Lab. The group estimates unauthorized workers paid about $66 billion in federal taxes in fiscal year 2023, with about two-thirds of that coming from payroll levies.

The Treasury Department—which oversees the IRS—earlier this week reached a deal with the Department of Homeland Security to share taxpayer information in response to law enforcement requests related to migration. While federal officials say the agreement includes safeguards and applies only to criminal matters, it reverses longstanding IRS privacy policies.

The report underscores the role undocumented workers play in paying into Social Security and Medicare benefit programs that they can’t draw from in retirement because of their immigration status. 

“The IRS has historically made clear to the undocumented immigrant population that their tax information is confidential and would not be used in such ways,” the report said. Tax compliance could fall among that group “if they become concerned that filing taxes could expose their personal contact information to law enforcement and be used to facilitate their deportation.”

President Donald Trump has enlisted the IRS and other government agencies in his efforts to crack down on undocumented immigration. He’s vowed to carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in U.S. history, and so far is ramping up raids and encouraging undocumented immigrants to “self-deport.”

The report notes that there’s “considerable uncertainty” around the estimates, as they will depend strongly on the behaviors of undocumented immigrants and their employers. The 10-year loss in revenue could be as low as $147 billion and as high as $479 billion, according to the Budget Lab.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Why Chipotle won’t raise prices even in the event of tariffs, according to CEO Scott Boatwright

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.