Connect with us

Business

‘The smell of stagflation’ is mounting as Trump’s Liberation Day arrives

Published

on



  • Fears of stagflation are rising as President Trump prepares to implement new tariffs, worsening trade tensions and potentially slowing economic growth while inflation ticks higher. Analysts and economists, including those from Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs, warn of weakening economic indicators, higher inflation expectations, and an increased risk of recession, prompting speculation that the Federal Reserve may sit tight on rate cuts until it has more data.

As the clock ticks down to President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’,fears of stagflation—sluggish growth with rising prices—are only mounting.

The White House has done little to soften the blow of an escalating trade war between Uncle Sam and some of its closest economic allies. In fact, President Trump has hinted “all countries” will face a hike in duties coming into effect immediately.

And while there will be time for negotiation—something White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has already confirmed—that will do little to mitigate the initial shockwaves rippling through global markets.

The dreary outlook is pushing analysts to take a more bearish stance on the U.S. economy in the shorter term.

Data suggesting rising inflation fears combined with hallmarks of a slowing economy—and that’s before President Trump’s Rose Garden announcement later today—is already leading many economists to expect stagflation.

In a morning note seen by Fortune, Deutsche Bank‘s Jim Reid wrote recent batches of U.S. data had fallen below expectations, “exacerbating” concern over stagflation.

For example, the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) measures manufacturing activity across 400 industrial companies to produce its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) report.

An index reading above 50 suggests expansion, a reading below suggests contraction. The latest PMI report released yesterday showed a reading of 49.0—even lower than the 49.5 expected.

The most notable drop in the index was from imports. While the reading for March was still 50.1%—scraping into ‘growth’ territory—it still saw a 2.5% drop-off compared to the month prior, suggesting slowing activity.

“The weaker ISM release saw the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow Q1 estimate…fall to a new low of -1.4%, while the model’s estimate of real private domestic final sales, which are much less distorted by trade volatility, fell to a still positive but weak +0.4%,” Reid added.

“The data is continuing to support the narrative of weaker growth and higher inflation, with market-based inflation expectations continuing to rise.”

Inflation expectations are similarly tipping higher, led by consumers but leading some experts to fear if markets will follow suit.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for example, found in its latest report that consumers’ inflation expectations for the next year sat at 3.1%—up by 0.1% on the month prior—and 3% over the next three to five years.

And while a regional federal bank president has warned the market against increasing their inflation expectations too steeply, the likes of Goldman Sachs have adjusted their expectation towards a more stagflationary environment.

Goldman economist David Mericle wrote on Monday that the financial giant had raised its core inflation expectation by 0.5pp to 3.5% by the end of 2025, and lowered its growth forecast by 0.5pp to 1%.

He added: “We raised our unemployment rate forecast by 0.3pp to 4.5% at end-2025 to reflect weaker GDP growth and the effects of federal spending cuts and layoffs.

“We raised our 12-month recession probability from 20% to 35%, reflecting our lower growth forecast, falling confidence, and statements from White House officials indicating willingness to tolerate economic pain.”

Slowing the course of the Fed

Meanwhile economist Claudia Sahm, who created the eponymous recession indicator, said she is identifying “whiffs” of stagflation concern in Fed data.

Pointing to Federal Reserve charts—which show growth flatlining and inflation charting higher than its downward trend over the past few years—Sahm wrote: “My ‘whiff’ characterization reflects the relatively modest hit to growth and boost to inflation this year, as well as the quick, low-pain return to disinflation next year. These are not stagflation forecasts, but they are a shift.”

Indications of potential stagflation are not the same as operating under these economic conditions, she added, highlighting Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee’s point that inflation still sits around 2% and unemployment remains stable.

She concluded: “The smell of stagflation—higher inflation and lower growth—is noticeable in the Fed communications, especially when discussing the risks to the outlook.

“Tariff-induced inflation has a better chance of being ‘transitory’ since the demand destruction from lower real incomes should blunt some of the inflation. That’s little comfort. Stagflation, even if modest, would be costly. 

“High uncertainty, unbalanced risks, and stagflationary impulses are more than enough to keep the Fed on hold.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s tariffs dash hopes of VC comeback in 2025: ‘It’s going to be an ugly problem’

Published

on



  • Tariff uncertainty is putting more pressure on the VC market, leaving investors hesitant as tech companies postpone IPOs. Global tariffs are also causing supply chain concerns which may eventually “dent VC appetite” for AI investments, according to PitchBook.

Trump’s global tariffs have dampened Silicon Valley’s hopes of a venture capital comeback in 2025, according to a new report from PitchBook that replaced the company’s previous optimistic outlook with a stark forecast for the coming year.

The turbulence in global equity markets has hit VC as several major tech startups have postponed their IPO plans in response to the sharp decline in tech stock valuations. The disruption is putting even more pressure on an industry already dealing with a slowdown in both tech IPOs and M&A activity.

“Should the latest iteration of tariffs stand, we expect significant pressure on fundraising and dealmaking in the near term as investors sit on the sidelines and wait for signs of market stabilization,” PitchBook analysts said in a first-quarter overview of the venture market.

They noted that while the first quarter of 2025 had several positive developments, such as CoreWeave completing its IPO and OpenAI securing a $40 billion funding round, these topline successes masked a more difficult reality across the market.

AI continued to dominate VC funding, capturing 71.1% of all U.S. venture capital in Q1 2025 — an increase from 46.8% in 2024. This was primarily boosted by large deals in the sector including OpenAI’s funding round, two Anthropic rounds totaling $4.5 billion, and Infinite Reality’s $3 billion round.

Clogging the IPO pipeline

The imbalance between demand and available capital remained steep, signaling a tough climate for dealmaking. According to PitchBook data, just $10 billion was raised across 87 VC funds, setting the stage for what could become the weakest fundraising year in over a decade.

Meanwhile, Trump’s global tariffs have already begun to weigh heavily on market sentiment—prompting the delay of several major IPOs and reinforcing expectations that the current liquidity crunch will persist through the remainder of 2025.

“The clogging of the IPO pipeline is probably the most significant immediate impact of the tariffs on venture funds and tech investors because it’s been a long dry spell,” Headline venture partner Kamran Ansari told Fortune.

“When you have an IPO and a listing, it has multiple beneficial effects on the venture ecosystem, you have liquidity for funds and investors and employees…and you see employees at those companies, once there’s liquidity, they can think about leaving and starting something new. Then you can refresh the cycle… All of these things get clogged and backed up when there’s no liquidity,” he said.

Hitting pause on IPO plans

Several high-profile companies have hit pause on their IPO plans amid the growing market uncertainty. Buy now, pay later giant Klarna and ticketing platform StubHub were both slated to IPO in the coming months but have since postponed those launches. Fintech company Chime has also reportedly delayed and effectively shelved its IPO plans following steep market losses triggered by new U.S. tariffs. 

“We don’t know what’s happening and we don’t know if we’re getting liquid,” Jon Keidan, founder of Torch Capital, told Fortune. “It’s going to be an ugly problem.”

Keidan added that tech companies could also face a demand decline on the product side if the economy enters a recession-constrained environment with low consumer sentiment.

“When it comes to AI, a lot of these fast-growing companies, especially on the enterprise side, are reliant on these orders coming through and companies growing and using their tools and buying their subscription and so on. So that’s starting to decrease or get hampered, that’s absolutely going to affect the market,” he said.

Keidan noted that while tariffs and an IPO clog may put pressure on later-stage funding, seed investment is largely getting “a free pass.”

“Those founders’ job is to block the noise, forget the macro trends, and think about how to develop technology and create a company to solve the pain points…so in a weird way, I’m telling my founders to ignore all this. Focus on what you’re doing. Focus on your customers, focus on what they need,” he said.

VC’s adopt a ‘wait-and-see’ approach

With tariffs putting significant pressure on fundraising and dealmaking, VC investors are adopting a “wait-and-see” approach amid policy global uncertainty, according to PitchBook analysts. Although demand for AI remains strong, new tariffs could disrupt chip supply chains, which may eventually “dent VC appetite” for AI investments, the report said.

According to a new report from Reuters, the tariffs could cost U.S. semiconductor equipment makers alone more than $1 billion a year.

AI data centers could also face significant exposure to tariffs well beyond just semiconductors — with experts previously telling Fortune that ripple effects could be far-reaching. These facilities rely heavily on a vast array of electronic and metal components, many of which are manufactured or assembled in countries now subject to new trade restrictions, including China.

“There’s a little bit of a wait-and-see approach right before making major purchases. So we’re definitely seeing that because of the tariffs,” Brian Sathianathan, co-founder and CTO of Iterate.ai, told Fortune.

“There’s a bit of slowdown in the private markets…but I think, in the long run, especially once you pass the 90-day mark, things will begin to pick up a lot faster and there’ll be better clarity,” he added.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

How CEOs should deal with Trump — even if it means ‘vaporware’ announcements

Published

on



  • In today’s CEO Daily: Peter Vanham talks to Nobel prize winner Simon Johnson about how CEOs should deal with President Trump.
  • The big story: Nvidia banned from exporting chips to China.
  • The markets: Moving down.
  • Analyst notes from Bank of America on airline cuts, WARC on adspend, and Goldman Sachs on investors exiting U.S. trades.
  • Plus: All the news and watercooler chat from Fortune.

Good morning. Nobel prize winners Simon Johnson and Daron Acemoglu wrote a whole book, Power and Progress, about the need to seize back control from a small elite of hubristic, messianic leaders pursuing their own interests (it helped them win the prestigious 2024 Economics prize). 

I was curious, then, what advice Johnson might have now for Fortune 500 business leaders dealing with the Trump administration’s prohibitive and volatile tariffs today. Surprisingly, Johnson was quite direct about what he thinks CEOs need to do now.

“Trump likes deals. There’s room for all kinds of deals,” he told me. “Go make a deal with someone in the administration. Make a big announcement in the US, with job creation—which may or may not materialize—and in return you ask for temporary dispensation, to keep the business alive and justify building in the US.” 

Michigan is a good place to start, he advised. “Or other industrial swing states such as Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, and perhaps Ohio, Indiana, and Minnesota. It’s not rocket science, either.” 

It doesn’t take a Nobel winner to predict that a lot of investment announcements will eventually turn out to be “vaporware” as Johnson puts it. The economics of Made in USA will prove to be impossible, starting with a mismatch in salaries (“Either you pay American workers $3 a day, which they’re not going to do, or the iPhone will cost you many multiples of what it costs now”). 

But with few alternative options, Johnson sees the realpolitik of investment-announcements-for-special-deals as the best strategy for business, especially for car makers and, to a lesser degree, high-profile electronics companies, such as Apple.

The companies that will eventually return to the US, Johnson said, are likely to do so in a highly automated way, as opposed to doing so with a lot of job creation.

And even so, in some sectors, such as textiles, toys, or other lower-end manufacturing, “even with the best intentions, it will be impossible” to manufacture in the US, Johnson said. For companies in those sectors, bonding together in trade associations and asking for dispensations would be the most viable alternative. 

Finally, companies across sectors would do well to remind the government they need the rule of law to thrive, Johnson advised. “You don’t want to be the squeaky wheel, but [companies] need to be serious about this.” — Peter Vanham

More news below.

Contact CEO Daily via Diane Brady at diane.brady@fortune.com

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Hong Kong will stop shipping small packages to the U.S. after Trump drops ‘de minimis’ exemption that let Shein and Temu sell to Americans

Published

on

Hong Kong’s post office will stop shipping small parcels to the United States after Washington announced plans to charge tariffs on small-value parcels from the southern Chinese city, the government said Wednesday.

The U.S. government earlier announced that it would end a customs exception allowing small-value parcels from Hong Kong to enter the U.S. without tax, slapping a 120% tariff on them starting from May 2. The “de minimis” exemption currently allows shipments that are worth less than $800 to go tax-free.

A government statement said Hongkong Post would not collect tariffs on behalf of Washington, and will suspend accepting non-airmail parcels containing goods destined for the U.S. on Wednesday, since items shipped by sea take more time. It will accept airmail parcels until Apr. 27.

“For sending items to the US, the public in Hong Kong should be prepared to pay exorbitant and unreasonable fees due to the U.S.’s unreasonable and bullying acts,” the government wrote.

It will continue accepting mail that contains only documents.

Hong Kong, is caught in the middle of the trade disputes between the U.S. and China despite being a free port.

The former British colony, which returned to Chinese rule in 1997, has trade and customs policies different from mainland China’s, under the semi-autonomy granted by Beijing during the handover. But Washington began treating it as part of China after Beijing imposed a national security law in 2020, and has applied the 145% tariffs imposed on Chinese imports.

The national security law, which China says has brought back stability to the city, has virtually silenced all dissent.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.