Connect with us

Business

GM, Hyundai sales jump as Trump tariff fears spur car buying

Published

on



Automakers including General Motors Co. and Hyundai Motor Co. reported higher US auto sales as the threat of price hikes from President Donald Trump’s tariffs drove consumers to showrooms.

GM’s deliveries soared 17% in the first quarter, with a 15% gain in retail volume, the company said Tuesday. Ford Motor Co. saw retail sales rise while Toyota Motor Corp. reported slight growth in the first three months of the year.

The past weekend was “by far the best weekend I’ve seen in a very long time,” Randy Parker, the chief executive officer of Hyundai and Genesis in North America, told reporters. “Lots of people rushed in this weekend, especially to try and beat the tariffs.”

The just-ended quarter may end up being the last of relative normalcy before the industry is upended by Trump’s 25% tariffs on passenger-vehicle imports that take effect this week. Cars assembled overseas account for about half of US auto sales. And even cars made domestically often use a significant amount of non-US parts, some of which may also be subject to levies.

Researchers including Edmunds and Cox Automotive had predicted volumes would likely get a boost from anxious shoppers buying before prices potentially rise.

“The prospect of tariffs is already beginning to affect the industry,” Thomas King, president of data and analytics at JD Power, said in a statement. March results were “particularly strong, enabled by consumers accelerating purchases to avoid potential tariff-related price increases.”

Hyundai saw record sales for the latest month and quarter, buoyed by double-digit gains in demand for its best-selling Tucson small SUV and Elantra compact sedan. For the first three months, Hyundai said Tuesday that it saw a 10% gain in deliveries to 203,554 vehicles, boosted by a 13% jump last month. 

Sister brand Kia Corp. similarly posted record sales, with an 11% rise in the January to March period to 198,850 vehicles. Buyers snapped up its compact Sportage SUV and new K4 sedan.

GM’s sales in March were strong, a company spokesman said, though it’s difficult to quantify how much came from buyers trying to get ahead of Trump’s tariffs. The Detroit-based automaker’s big gains came from freshened versions of the Chevrolet Colorado mid-size pickup, which was up 73%, while sales of the Chevy Traverse mid-sized SUV rose 62%.

Toyota sales grew 7.7% in March, but less than 1% in the year-to-date period. Deliveries of the Japanese automaker’s best-selling RAV4 compact SUV and Camry midsize sedan declined during the latest month and quarter. The two models are Toyota’s top sellers and inventories are tight, a US-based spokesman for the carmaker said. 

Sales of Lexus luxury brand vehicles rose 5.8% in March and 14% in the January-March period.

Ford saw a 5% quarterly gain in retail sales and 19% jump in March alone. But overall volume slipped 1.3% in the first quarter to 498,480 units, excluding heavy trucks. That was largely due to lower rental fleet sales and the discontinuation of two models, the company said.

Honda reported a 5% rise in first—quarter sales and a 13% jump in March across its namesake brand and Acura luxury vehicle lines. Deliveries of the Japanese carmaker’s top-selling CR-V crossover grew 9% in the quarter and 24% last month.

Tesla Inc. is expected to detail its global delivery numbers for the most recent quarter on Wednesday.

Tariff Threats

Representatives of several large US automakers have been lobbying the Trump administration to exclude certain low-cost car components from the planned tariffs, Bloomberg News reported Monday.

While it’s not clear how new costs will be distributed between automakers, suppliers and car buyers, prices are expected to rise considerably. A recent study by Anderson Economic Group found that the tariffs could increase the cost to build vehicles by as much as $12,000. That could make some models unviable in the US, particularly at the lower end of the market.

Sales of Chevy’s South Korea-made Trax small SUV rose 57%. That vehicle faces a 25% tariff starting April 3.

GM’s electric-vehicle sales nearly doubled in the quarter, led by its Mexico-made Chevy Blazer and Equinox EVs. Those models would be hit by tariffs on their non-US parts content if Trump sticks to his original plan.

Dealers have seen a surge in demand from would-be buyers worried about prices. Chevrolet dealer Duane Paddock said GM sent an unusually large amount of inventory to meet the buyer interest.

US dealerships are sitting on about 60 to 90 days of inventory on average, providing them with a cushion against the immediate effects of the tariffs.

“It has created an urgency to buy it now before there’s a price increase,” Rhett Ricart, a dealer of Ford, Chevrolet, Hyundai and other brands in Columbus, Ohio, said.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Meta whistleblower claims tech giant built $18 billion business by aiding China in AI race and undermining U.S. national security

Published

on

Former Facebook executive Sarah Wynn-Williams testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday, accusing the social media company of undermining national security and briefing China on U.S. artificial intelligence efforts in order to grow its business there.

“We are engaged in a high-stakes AI arms race against China. And during my time at Meta, company executives lied about what they were doing with the Chinese Communist Party to employees, shareholders, Congress, and the American public,” Wynn-Williams said in her prepared testimony.

Her book “Careless People,” an explosive insider account of her time at the social media giant, sold 60,000 copies in its first week and reached the top 10 on Amazon.com’s best-seller list amid efforts by Meta to discredit the work and stop her from talking about her experiences at the company. Meta used a “campaign of threats and intimidation” to silence the former executive, said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut, during the hearing.

Wynn-Williams served as director of global public policy at Facebook, now Meta, from 2011 until she was fired in 2017.

“Throughout those seven years, I saw Meta executives repeatedly undermine U.S. national security and betray American values. They did these things in secret to win favor with Beijing and build an $18 billion dollar business in China,” she said in her prepared remarks.

Wynn-Williams also said Meta deleted the Facebook account of a prominent Chinese dissident living in the U.S., bowing to pressure from China to do so.

In a statement, Meta said Wynn-Williams’ testimony “is divorced from reality and riddled with false claims. While Mark Zuckerberg himself was public about our interest in offering our services in China and details were widely reported beginning over a decade ago, the fact is this: we do not operate our services in China today.”

The hearing comes just days before Meta’s massive antitrust trial is scheduled to begin. The Federal Trade Commission’s case against the tech giant could force the company to divest Instagram and WhatsApp.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s China tariff attack will crush ‘Main Street’ U.S. businesses on Amazon

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

SEC lawyer heading case on Elon Musk’s Twitter acquisition resigns, cites “heartbreaking” decision

Published

on



In one of its last actions before President Donald Trump entered office in January, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued Elon Musk for securities violations related to his acquisition of Twitter, now known as X. Now, the top attorney on the case, Robin Andrews, has resigned from the agency, according to a LinkedIn post and a court filing. On LinkedIn, Andrews did not cite a specific reason for his decision, but described his resignation as a “heartbreaking day” that came after weeks of excruciating deliberation. 

According to two people familiar with the resignation, who spoke with Fortune on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private deliberation, Andrews had expressed concerns to colleagues that the SEC, under a Trump-appointed Chair, would vote to dismiss the case or settle it for a small penalty. Those concerns were a factor in his decision to leave the agency, according to the people. 

“The SEC must always be focused on protecting investors and holding violators accountable, no matter who they are,” Andrews wrote in the LinkedIn post. “Only then can the public have confidence that the securities markets are not rigged against “main street” investors in favor of the wealthy or the powerful.”

His April 4 resignation came just a few days after Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, entered the SEC, and after Musk taunted the agency for its decision to bring an enforcement action. In December, Musk posted a letter on his social media platform X that he received from the agency issuing a settlement demand. “Oh Gary, how could you do this to me?” Musk wrote, referencing then-SEC chair Gary Gensler. 

Andrews declined to comment. A spokesperson for the SEC did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

SEC v. Musk

Musk has had a long-standing feud with the SEC, dating back to 2018, when the agency charged Musk with securities fraud for a series of tweets about a potential transaction to take Tesla private. Musk settled the charges, agreeing to a personal $20 million penalty and to step down as the company’s chairman. 

Musk’s more recent dispute with the SEC came after he acquired Twitter in 2022. The SEC launched an investigation into Musk buying a minority position in the company before the acquisition and whether he properly disclosed his position, which allegedly allowed him to pay less for shares than he would have had to with proper disclosure. 

Musk and SEC lawyers fought in court over scheduling an interview, with the billionaire poking barbs at the agency on X as its enforcement action drew near. Bloomberg columnist Matt Levine wrote that the pending litigation was “not that serious a securities violation…but a very obvious violation,” describing it an “absolutely open-and-shut violation of the law.” 

The SEC ultimately filed its lawsuit on Jan. 14, 2025, just days before Trump was set to take office, with Andrews listed as the lead attorney, calling for a civil penalty and disgorgement, a legal term for returning profits. Musk’s lawyers denounced the action, describing it as a “sham” after a “multiyear campaign of harassment.” 

As Musk’s power in the Trump administration grew, including directing DOGE to reshape various federal agencies, the lawsuit continued to slowly progress. On March 31, the SEC and Musk jointly moved to set June 6 as the date for Musk to respond to the SEC’s complaint. Just three days before, SEC staff were informed over email that the agency would begin working with DOGE officials, though the extent of its mandate remained unknown. 

Another attorney on the Musk lawsuit, Bernard Smyth, also left the agency last week, according to two people familiar with the matter.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.