The House State Administration Budget Subcommittee is scrutinizing money spent on the comings and goings of Lottery Secretary John Davis.

The panel reviewed itemized travel costs of more than $50,000 between January 2021 and November 2024. Many of the trips were personal appearances, site visits and speaking gigs, though conference travel took him to Paris last October.

Chair Vicki Lopez, who wondered last week how “the Department in the state of Florida benefit by having the secretary in Paris away from day-to-day operations for so long,” contextualized the data in terms of the previous committee meeting, in which they wondered where Davis lived.

“Reimbursements are provided for planes, trains and automobiles. The Secretary’s total travel from January of 2021 through November of 2024 was over $50,000,” Lopez said.

“We’ve also provided a document for the travel that includes Orlando as part of the destination. These trips alone cost $27,840. Many of the destinations are simply Orlando and the transportation used is his personal vehicle, for which he is getting reimbursed. While we don’t know the originating city, it appears to indicate that the secretary is being reimbursed to commute home from Tallahassee to Orlando.”

The data leaves further open questions.

“The Secretary told us last week he would get his travel information back to us. We look forward to that response and hope it includes information regarding all the travel in this document,” Lopez added.

“I also want to note that we are not able to find any reimbursements made after November of 2024. We don’t know if he stopped getting reimbursed for travel, stopped traveling, or if this is a delay in information being posted. So I think the subcommittee would like to know any additional travel information for the last four months as well.”

As 12 News reported last week, lawmakers in the same committee scrutinized members of a Department of Management Services “enterprise cybersecurity data” group getting more than $56,000 in travel expenses. It was revealed then that Chief Data Officer Edward Rhyne lives out of state, and more than $40,000 was spent on his travel.

Post Views: 0

Small-scale beer manufacturers may be able to skip the middleman when it comes to getting lagers, ales and stouts to the masses.

The House State Administration Budget Subcommittee has advanced HB 499, which allows microbreweries producing up to 31,000 gallons a year to self-distribute and to get out of current distribution contracts with 24 months’ notice.

The bill is a priority of the Brewers’ Association, which says it is also a priority of House leadership.

Advocates say that it’s no brew-ha-ha; rather, they frame it as a matter of business survival.

Sarah Curl of Pasco County’s Emerald Coast Brewing Company made a more localized case, noting that her company’s “small and intentional” production leaves it out of larger distributors’ business plans.

“Nobody cares more about the quality of their beer than a small-craft brewer,” Curl said.

Her goal: to be able to walk a keg to a restaurant down the street rather than have that same keg languish on a truck to fit the current “outdated, post-prohibition laws” that block local restaurants from serving local brews on tap.

Veteran brewmaster Timothy Shackton of the Ulele Spring Brewery likewise advocated for “limited self-distribution,” saying it benefited “small brewers” and the “community as a whole,” and arguing the proposal could “level the playing field.”

“Right now, many small brewers face a tough choice: sign long-term contracts with distributors and commit to large capacity orders that financially squeeze them or, worse yet, they’re unable to fulfill. Those demands can be crippling,” Shackton said.

Danielle Snitkar of Florida Hoppy Brands advocated for a coalition of microbreweries that are “not in a position to go with a large distributor” given limited production runs and lack of capital to buy into the three-tier system.

Brian Detweiler of the Florida Brewers Guild said the bill “could be the difference between your constituents keeping and losing part of their community: their beloved local brewery.” He described the bill as a “bridge to the three-tier system” by a “small, scrappy brewery,” and noted that 39 states already allow what Florida is considering.

Yet members of other groups presented more of a bitter beer face.

Jared Ross of the Florida Beer Wholesalers Association said his group “strongly opposes” the bill, which “goes too far” and threatens the “three-tier system” of manufacturers/importers, distributors/wholesalers, and retailers by “allowing smaller manufacturers to self-distribute.”

After the public had its say, legislators weighed in pro and con.

Republican Rep. Taylor Yarkosky said the “awesome” bill was a way to “empower and open the door” for small producers.

Republican Rep. Shane Abbott welcomed further “tweaks,” but backed the bill.

Democratic Rep. Felicia Robinson urged legislators to be “careful” about how rules are changed, expressing her concern that “all players play within the system.” While she was up on the bill, she was concerned about tinkering with the regulation of alcoholic beverages.

While the legislation has one committee to go before the House floor, the Senate may offer a buzzkill. Sen. Jay Collins’ bill (SB 1818) has yet to be put on a committee agenda.

Post Views: 0

A trio of spring elections provided early warning signs to Republicans and President Donald Trump on Tuesday, as Democrats rallied against his efforts to slash the federal government and the outsize role being played by billionaire Elon Musk in the early days of his new administration.

In the marquee race for a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat, the conservative judge endorsed by Trump and backed by Musk and his groups to the tune of $21 million lost by 10 percentage points in a state Trump won in November. And while Florida Republicans held two of the most pro-Trump House districts in the country, both candidates underperformed Trump’s November margins.

The elections — the first major contests since Trump’s return to power — were seen as an early measure of voter sentiment as Trump works with unprecedented speed to dramatically upend the federal government, clashing with the courts and seeking revenge as he tests the bounds of presidential power.

The party that loses the presidency in November typically picks up seats in the next midterm elections, and Tuesday’s results provided hope for Democrats — who have faced a barrage of internal and external criticism about their response to Trump — that they can follow that trend.

Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist and podcaster whose group worked alongside Musk to boost conservative Brad Schimel in Wisconsin, argued Tuesday’s Supreme Court loss underscored a fundamental challenge for Republicans, particularly in races where Trump is not on the ballot.

“We did a lot in Wisconsin, but we fell short. We must realize and appreciate that we are the LOW PROP party now,” he said in an X post, referring to low-propensity voters who don’t regularly cast ballots. “The party has been remade. Special elections and off-cycle elections will continue to be a problem without a change of strategy.”

Trump won Wisconsin in November by 0.8 percentage points, or fewer than 30,000 votes. In the first major test since he took office in January, the perennial battleground state shifted significantly to the left, and not only in typical Democratic strongholds.

Sauk County, northwest of the state capital of Madison, is a state bellwether. Trump won it in November by 626 votes. Sauk shifted 16 percentage points in the direction of Judge Susan Crawford, the liberal backed by national Democrats and billionaire donors like George Soros.

Besides strong turnout in Democratic-heavy areas, Crawford did measurably better in the suburban Milwaukee counties that Republicans rely on to run up their margins statewide.

Crawford won Kenosha and Racine counties, both of which went for Trump over Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. She won by about 10 percentage points there.

Turnout was just under 50%, a full 10 percentage points higher than the previous record high for a Wisconsin Supreme Court election, set just two years ago.

In interviews with dozens of voters across the state, including more than 20 in Waunakee, a politically mixed town north of Madison, many Democrats suggested without prompting that their vote was as much if not more of a repudiation of Trump’s first months in office than a decision on the direction of the state high court.

“This is our chance to say no,” said Linda Grassl, a retired OB-GYN registered nurse, after voting at the Waunakee Public Library corridor Tuesday.

“We have to fight, and this is where the fight is today,” agreed Theresa Peer, a 49-year-old business-owner born and raised in Milwaukee, who called the election a “fight for our democracy.” She said she hoped a Crawford win would serve as a “symbol of opposition” to the Trump administration, particularly on the issues of women’s reproductive rights and slashed education spending.

Others disliked the richest man in the world playing such a prominent role.

“I don’t like Elon Musk spending money for an election he should have no involvement in,” said Antonio Gray, a 38-year-old Milwaukee security guard. “They should let the voters vote for who they want to vote for instead of inserting themselves like they have.”

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, in a floor speech Wednesday, called the results “a political warning shot from the American people” and a sign that “Democrats’ message is resonating.”

“Just 70 days into Trump 2.0, Americans are tired of the chaos. They are tired of Elon Musk attacking Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare,” he said.

Former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said that part of the challenge for Republicans had been “trying to connect the dots” to turn the state Supreme Court race into one about Trump — a difficult task in a state judicial race. He wondered if the outcome would have been different had Trump paid a visit to the state instead of hosting a telephone town hall.

“If you’re somebody who showed up for Trump because you feel forgotten, you don’t typically show up to vote in” these kinds of elections, he said, imagining voters asking themselves: “What does this have to do with Trump?”

Still, Walker cautioned against reading the tea leaves too closely.

“I’d be a little bit careful about reading too much into what happens nationally,” he said.

Trump had better luck in Florida, where Republican Randy Fine won his special election in the 6th District to replace Mike Waltz, who stepped down to serve as Trump’s national security adviser. But Fine beat his Democratic challenger, Josh Weil, by 14 percentage points less than five months after Waltz won the district by 33.

“This is the functional equivalent of Republicans running a competitive race in the district that is represented by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,” said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries beforehand, invoking a liberal favorite whom Trump often denigrates. “Kamala Harris won that district by 30 points. Do you think a Republican would even be competitive in that district in New York, currently held by Alex? Of course, not.”

Jimmy Patronis, the state’s chief financial officer, fended off a challenge from Democrat Gay Valimont to win the northwest Florida seat vacated by Matt Gaetz but also underperformed Gaetz’s last margin of victory.

The pair of wins gave Republicans a 220-213 margin in the House of Representatives, when concerns about a thin GOP majority led Trump to pull the nomination of New York Rep. Elise Stefanik to be United Nations ambassador.

For voters in both districts, the clear draw was Trump.

Teresa Horton, 72, didn’t know much at all about Tuesday’s election — but said she didn’t need to.

“I don’t even know these people that are on there,” she said of her ballot. “I just went with my ticket.”

Brenda Ray, 75, a retired nurse, said she didn’t know a lot about Patronis, either, but cast her ballot for him because she believes he’ll “vote with our president.”

“That’s all we’re looking for,” she said.

Both Patronis and Fine were badly outraised by their Democratic challengers. Michael Whatley, chairman of the Republican National Committee, argued that what was a GOP concern before Tuesday night had been a sign of the party’s strength.

“The American people sent a clear message tonight: they want elected officials who will advance President Trump’s America First agenda, and their votes can’t be bought by national Democrats,” he said in a statement.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.

Post Views: 0