Connect with us

Politics

House committee cracks down on gaps in apprenticeship funding

Published

on


The bill ensures that money meant for apprenticeship education actually reaches the program.

Florida is doubling down on its commitment to building a stronger, safer construction workforce — with a renewed focus on transparency to make sure taxpayer dollars for apprenticeship programs are actually going where they’re supposed to.

HB 681 by Rep. Lauren Melo, which received unanimous approval in the House Careers & Workforce Subcommittee yesterday, aims to increase access to these programs while shining a light on funding transparency and accountability.

For years, Florida has invested heavily in apprenticeship education, recognizing that these programs provide a direct pipeline to high-paying, in-demand careers without the burden of student debt. But a recent apprenticeship panel discussion by this same subcommittee revealed a troubling issue: Some local education agencies with which apprenticeship programs are required to partner have been diverting up to 60% of state apprenticeship funds away from actual training.

HB 681 ensures that money meant for apprenticeship education actually reaches the programs, rather than being swallowed up by bureaucracy.

The bill increases oversight, requires annual reporting, and restructures funding so private-sector partners — who provide classroom space, instructors, and materials — receive fair reimbursement that reflects the caliber of the instructors and the curriculum they bring to the table

Apprenticeship programs can’t exist without the private sector, and the legislation is designed to make sure their investment in training Florida’s workforce is properly supported.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Casey DeSantis defends Hope Florida before Senate committee vote

Published

on


Standing alongside her husband, First Lady Casey DeSantis defended her Hope Florida initiative as lawmakers will debate the program’s fate later Tuesday.

“When somebody is in need of help, do you get a check for government assistance, and that’s where the story ends? Or can we help you on a pathway to economic self-sufficiency? Can we provide you with a lifeline of hope at the end of the day?” Casey DeSantis said at a press conference in Tallahassee.

She spoke less than three hours before the Senate Governmental Oversight and Accountability Committee is scheduled to debate a bill related to Hope Florida.

SB 1144, by Sen. Danny Burgess, codifies the Office of Hope Florida within the Governor’s Office.

The bill comes amid speculation about whether Casey DeSantis is running to replace her term-limited husband. Gov. Ron DeSantis is also feuding with Republican legislative leaders who have pushed back on his initiatives since this year’s Special Session on immigration reform.

The First Lady started Hope Florida in 2021 as to serve as “a connection point for community collaboration between the public and private sector, faith-based communities, and nonprofits,” the group’s website said.

The Miami Herald recently reported that “details surrounding its performance, personnel and separate fundraising arm have been vague.”

Both Ron DeSantis and Casey DeSantis were defiant in support of Hope Florida Tuesday.

“The possibilities are not even limited to other states copying,” the Governor said. “Both the First Lady and I have briefed both the President and Elon Musk about this as a way to produce better outcomes, but you could save a lot of money too when you’re looking at how some of these federal programs operate.”

Casey DeSantis said Hope Florida taps into church and faith groups.

“We have 16.5 million people of faith across this state, 20,000 institutions,” she said. “You think if they knew that mom was struggling and needed some help, how cool would it be if they could show up at her front doorstep with a plate of lasagna to say, ‘I heard you were going through some tough times. We got you.’ We can do that in the state of Florida.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Patterson’s Law’ protecting families against false child abuse claims clears final Senate committee

Published

on


A bill that would give innocent parents a much-needed way to disprove false child abuse claims is heading to the Senate floor after clearing its last committee hurdle.

Members of the Senate Rules Committee voted unanimously for SB 304, which among other things would enable parents whose children are removed from their custody on suspicion of physical abuse to request additional medical examinations — at their expense — in certain cases.

The bill is called “Patterson’s Law” after Michael and Tasha Patterson and their twin sons, whom the Department of Children and Families (DCF) took custody of in 2022 after broken bones the boys suffered raised alarms during an emergency room visit.

The couple took their matter to court, citing medical evidence showing that like their mother, the boys — who have still not been returned — have a rare genetic disorder called Ehlers-Danlos syndrome that causes fragile bones and easy bruising.

The Pattersons’ story is not an isolated incident. One Facebook group for families “who have been impacted by the medical misdiagnosis of child abuse” called Parents Behind The Pinwheels has 9,200 likes and 16,000 followers.

“The goal of this legislation is to protect vulnerable children, give parents a right to a qualified medical opinion for their children and reunify families who would otherwise be wrongfully separated,” said Broward County Democratic Sen. Barbara Sharief, a doctor of nursing practice who presented the bill.

Sharief said various preexisting genetic conditions like Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, rickets, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency can lead to signs of bodily harm that aren’t due to physical abuse, but the state’s process for determining whether that’s the case is faulty, and it’s hurting families.

Today, she said, when there is a report of physical abuse, DCF conducts a visit and if visible bodily harm is observed, the child is immediately removed from the parent for their safety. A 24-hour shelter follows, after which a temporary protective supervision process begins, lasting up to 21 days until a determination is made.

But genetic testing critical to identifying preexisting conditions can take upward of six months to process, and in many cases siblings must also undergo testing that further delays reunification.

“The issue is that child protective investigators who may not be familiar with these diseases often make initial determinations of abuse based solely on physical findings — injuries such as broken ribs, bowed limbs (and) dislocated joints, which are characteristic of certain medical conditions — (that) can be misdiagnosed as a sign of physical abuse,” Sharief said.

“This bill will ask that a qualified physician or medical professional gives an opinion to determine whether (the child’s injuries are) consistent with an underlying medical condition or with child abuse. Currently, parents do not have enough time to identify or submit a second opinion (from a qualified physician or medical professional to challenge an abuse determination, (and) families are wrongfully separated.”

SB 304 and its House analog (HB 511) aim to fix that. It would give DCF more time to forward allegations of criminal conduct to a law enforcement agency if a parent alleges the existence of certain preexisting medical conditions or has requested an examination.

The bill, effective July 1, would require child protective investigators to remind parents at the beginning of an investigation that they have a duty to report their child’s preexisting conditions and provide supporting records in a timely manner. It would also mandate that child protective teams consult with a licensed physician or advanced practice registered nurse with relevant experience in such cases.

Boynton Beach Democratic Sen. Lori Berman commended Sharief for filing SB 304 and noted that numerous parents who had been affected by the issue had spoken in favor of the legislation at the bill’s prior committee stop.

“It was so emotional and moving and gut-wrenching because a lot of them have still not even been reunited with their children,” said Berman, who in 2023 passed Greyson’s Law to better safeguard children at risk of parental harm. “This is a really necessary bill.”

The Florida Smart Justice Alliance and Florida Justice Association signaled support for SB 304, which pends scheduling for Senate floor consideration.

HB 511, sponsored by Weston Democratic Rep. Robin Bartleman and Shalimar Republican Rep. Patt Maney awaits a hearing before the second of two committees to which it was referred.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ron DeSantis says Randy Fine doesn’t live in CD 6, voters can ‘quibble’ about Donald Trump endorsing him

Published

on


The Governor is getting his final shots in at a rival GOP state Senator who may be headed to Congress.

Gov. Ron DeSantis cast some last-minute aspersions against the congressional campaign of state Sen. Randy Fine, suggesting there was room to question why President Donald Trump endorsed him in Florida’s 6th Congressional District.

DeSantis said an “underperformance” by Fine represented “a rejection of the specific candidate amongst some voters who either choose not to vote, maybe even vote third party,” though he questioned how many voters would cross over to support “lunatic Democrat” Josh Weil.

DeSantis, who has warned previously of a “candidate-specific” problem in the Daytona-centered district, noted that Fine’s credibility issues extend to residency, as the Melbourne Republican didn’t even live in the district when he began his run to replace National Security Adviser Mike Waltz in Tuesday’s Special Election.

“Remember, he’s not from that district. He lives like 150 miles away,” DeSantis said.

DeSantis also said that while people “can quibble with Trump endorsing or not,” it’s a separate issue than Fine’s own deficiencies as a candidate.

“I think it’s more of a local reason. I think it’s going to be more of a candidate specific reason. I don’t think if there’s an underperformance that that’s a referendum on the President. I think (if) the President was on the ballot, I think he would win by 30 again,” DeSantis said.

DeSantis and Fine have feuded since late 2023, when Fine accused the Governor of coddling neo-Nazis. DeSantis pointed to his record on Israel and other issues important to people of the Jewish faith in arguing that Fine was just looking to make a name for himself.

However, the Governor appears to have helped Fine to some small degree.

Fine’s campaign spokesperson said last month he appreciated DeSantis “deploying his team” to help out in the stretch run of the campaign. However, that help is less public than the tele-town hall events staged with President Trump and U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds in recent days.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.