Connect with us

Politics

Emoji meme — spaced out — Powell push — farm bill — FEMA

Published

on


Fist bump. America. Fire.

A political firestorm spread through Washington after a report that President Donald Trump’s hand-picked military leaders included a journalist from The Atlantic in a message thread on Signal about a recent attack on the Houthis. But one particular message became an instant meme.

National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, a former Northeast Florida Congressman who resigned his seat in January to take on his White House role, replied to developments of the counteroffensive attack with a series of emojis: a fist bump, an American flag and a flame.

Mike Waltz’s emoji-filled Houthi attack response draws fire from Democrats, concern from Republicans.

The cartoon communication style, included in a thread intended to be private within a group of administration leaders, attracted criticism and was derided as immature and unprofessional. It also became the most imitated portion of the entire text conversation.

That came from Democratic critics, including some former colleagues of Waltz’s in the congressional delegation like Reps. Maxwell Frost and Jared Moskowitz. “No, this is not an article from The Onion,” posted Frost, an Orlando Democrat.

Moskowitz, a Parkland Democrat with a penchant for social media trolling, posted screenshots of the three emojis to his X feed on five separate occasions Monday, the day The Atlantic released news about the thread.

But perhaps more serious for Waltz, he was also quickly fingered as the reason The Atlantic reporter Jeffrey Goldberg ended up on the text chain. POLITICO reported that the episode prompted an internal conversation about whether Waltz should be forced from his White House role. “It was reckless to be having that conversation on Signal,” one official anonymously told the outlet. “You can’t have recklessness as the national security adviser.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, though, defended Waltz amid criticism. “As President Trump said, the attacks on the Houthis have been highly successful and effective. President Trump continues to have the utmost confidence in his national security team, including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz,” read a statement provided to CNN.

In Congress, Republicans expressed concerns about the thread but stopped short of demanding scalps. House Foreign Affairs Chair Brian Mast, a Stuart Republican and a close ally of Waltz during their time in the House, said he was “absolutely” concerned about using Signal to discuss classified information, according to The Hill. But Mast argued there was no “systemic thing” that warranted investigation.

Rocket roundtable

Sen. Ashley Moody convened space leaders from around the state as part of a push from Florida lawmakers to relocate NASA headquarters to the Space Coast.

The Plant City Republican led a roundtable discussion at Space Florida’s headquarters to discuss the benefits of such a move.

“We are working with leaders in the space industry to advance our efforts to bring NASA headquarters to Florida,” Moody said.

Ashley Moody and Rick Scott lead push to bring NASA headquarters to Florida’s Space Coast.

“Today’s discussion highlighted just how well-situated Florida’s Space Coast is for this monumental move, and how this effort would improve efficiency, foster collaboration with private space companies and capitalize on our well-trained, highly skilled aeronautical workforce. It would also boost our economy, increase tourism, and solidify Florida as the Space State. I am proud to be the sponsor of the CAPE Canaveral Act and will continue fighting in Washington to bring NASA headquarters here where it belongs.”

She filed a bill with Sen. Rick Scott to move NASA HQ to Florida. But Texas leaders also want the space agency there. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott launched a state commission to promote the industry there.

Rep. Mike Haridopolos, a Space Coast Republican, was also part of Moody’s forum, as was Florida International University Interim President and former Lt. Gov. Jeanette Nuñez, who chairs Space Florida.

Space Florida CEO Rob Long participated, as did Embry-Riddle University President P. Barry Butler and Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Rodney Cruise, University of Central Florida physicist Dr. Philip Metzger, and EDC Florida Space Coast President Lynda Weatherman.

Pushing Powell

After years of criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Scott called for the economic leader’s resignation.

“Jay Powell proves time and time again that he is a failure at the Federal Reserve,” Scott wrote in a Fox News op-ed.

Much of the write-up criticized policies under former President Joe Biden. Scott said Powell has mismanaged the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet to the point that it grew to an “unsustainable $6.8 trillion.”

After years of criticism, Rick Scott demanded Jerome Powell’s resignation over Fed’s ‘mismanagement.’

“I talk to Floridians who can’t afford a mortgage because of high interest rates,” he said. “They’re working 40+ hours a week but still relying on food banks for dinner, and they don’t understand why their federal government has been driving policies for the past four years that make things worse for them. That is unacceptable and I know that I am not the only one here in Washington (who) is hearing these heartbreaking stories. Now, it is incumbent on those who have the power to reverse these failures to act.”

The demand from Scott comes as Trump and Powell publicly debate whether interest rates should be lowered.

Farm bill frustrations

The farm bill was supposed to pass nearly two years ago but remains mired in negotiations between the House and Senate. Can it be included in the budget reconciliation process?

Rep. Kat Cammack, the top Florida Republican on the House Agriculture Committee, said that’s “absolutely feasible.” But in an interview with Agri-Pulse Newsmakers, she clarified that it could be a tough row to hoe.

Despite stalled negotiations, Kat Cammack believes the farm bill can be included in budget reconciliation.

“Reconciliation, it’s a beast. It is an arduous process from start to finish,” the Gainesville Republican said. “And so even though you avoid the 60-vote threshold in the Senate, you have to really reconcile the House and the Senate, and really be mindful of revenues, impacts, outlays. And the farm bill is a beast of a bill in itself.”

Cammack said the process could be so lengthy that it’s unlikely to get done this budget year. Meanwhile, she said agriculture producers in Florida and nationwide desperately need certainty about what a farm bill will contain.

“I’ve heard, OK, we’re going to try to get this done by the beginning of Fall. I’m sorry, but we can’t go until the Fall for answers,” she said. “And so, there is a lot of us aggies on the Hill that are concerned that this is going to end up getting pushed to the back burner, as it has in the past, and we just can’t keep kicking the can down the road.”

Leadership fights

As House leadership navigates a tight majority to pass significant legislation, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna voiced irritation at Speaker Mike Johnson for how he has managed members not perfectly in lockstep with his agenda.

The St. Petersburg Republican, a loyalist to Trump who has criticized House leadership, voiced frustrations on X shortly after complaining that Johnson would leak details of budget negotiations with the Senate to press ahead of informing members. She touched on several disagreements she has had with the Louisiana Republican.

Anna Paulina Luna criticizes Speaker Mike Johnson’s leadership, citing budget leaks and other disagreements.

“Leadership has been dragging their feet on codifying anything Trump has done. Yet they’re actively working against parents being able to vote,” Luna posted, before arguing she was retaliated against while pursuing a post on the House Armed Services Committee (HASC).

“Did you know they also kept me off HASC (a female vet) because I voted with Rep. Thomas Massie to try to stop FISA in current form? If we’re going to talk to the press, at least be honest with what you guys are doing behind the scenes. I like Johnson, but the swamp is still alive and well.”

Union busting

Rep. Scott Franklin has renewed an effort to limit labor representatives’ ability to perform union work on the taxpayer’s dime.

The Lakeland Republican reintroduced the Taxpayer-Funded Union Time Transparency Act, which requires agencies to report how much “official time” union leaders are paid to do work while being paid as public employees.

Scott Franklin seeks transparency in federal employees’ taxpayer-funded union work.

“Taxpayers shouldn’t pay for empty federal office buildings or for federal employees to unionize on the clock,” Franklin said. “It’s just common sense — Americans deserve a full, detailed account of how bureaucrats use both their official time and office space for union-related work.”

Sen. Joni Ernst, an Iowa Republican, will carry a Senate companion.

The bill as written would require agencies to report the total amount of official time authorized under federal law, provide data on person-hours used for union duties, including negotiation, mediation and arbitration, reveal the square footage of federal space set aside for unions, along with reimbursement information and show year-over-year comparisons on all of this data with justifications for any increased spending.

“This is exactly the kind of waste and abuse my friend, Sen. Joni Ernst, and I are fighting to root out alongside the Trump administration,” Franklin said. “The President was right to order federal employees back to the office — but if taxpayers are footing the bill, workers must be accountable for how they spend their official time. Our bill will provide critical transparency and expose entrenched bureaucrats who have been skirting these important reporting requirements for far too long.”

Elevating FEMA

​​Two Representatives who know more than they want about hurricane recovery would like to elevate the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) status.

Rep. Byron Donalds, a Naples Republican, joined Moskowitz to file a bill that would make FEMA a Cabinet-level agency reporting directly to the President, as reported by Fox News. FEMA falls under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) umbrella.

Byron Donalds and Jared Moskowitz propose making FEMA a Cabinet-level agency, removing it from DHS.

Donalds represents Southwest Florida, which in 2022 took a direct hit from Hurricane Ian as a Category 5 hurricane. Moskowitz, meanwhile, previously served as Florida’s Director of Emergency Management.

“As the first Emergency Management Director ever elected to Congress, I’ve seen firsthand the challenges of preparing for, responding to and recovering from disaster events,” Moskowitz said. “As these emergencies continue to grow larger and more widespread, the American people deserve a federal response that is efficient and fast.”

Donalds said it could also serve the mission of government efficiency.

“It is imperative that FEMA is removed from the bureaucratic labyrinth of DHS and instead is designated to report directly to the President of the United States.”

More TPS changes

The Trump administration’s revocation of temporary legal status for 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans will impact residents of Florida more than any other state.

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, a Miramar Democrat and Haitian American, slammed the decision as an attack on those at risk of persecution in their homelands.

Trump policy impacting 530,000 draws fire from Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, citing persecution risk.

“As I’ve stated before, the abrupt removal of nearly half a million individuals is inhumane, irrational, and it will have an irreparable impact on businesses across the country and our economy at large,” Cherfilus-McCormick said.

“Those with humanitarian parole status legally work and pay taxes in the U.S. Across South Florida and throughout the nation, they have strengthened our workforce, supporting our airports, our hospitals, our small businesses and our schools.”

According to the Migration Policy Institute, 49% of Haitian immigrants in the U.S. live in Florida, along with 51% of Venezuelans and 76% of Cubans. Similar breakdowns were not available for Nicaraguans, but 11% of immigrants in the U.S. from Central America live in Florida, and Nicaraguans make up roughly 7% of that group, according to Institute data.

Cherfilus-McCormick said those communities need to be heard in Washington.

“I continue to remain in communication with those who would bear the brunt of this decision and am strongly urging the administration to reverse course immediately,” she said.

Blasting Global Media

While the decision to dismantle the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), including Radio Martí in Miami, generated bipartisan pushback in South Florida, Mast clearly supported the move.

Mast, a Stuart Republican, chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee. In that capacity, he has criticized silencing broadcasts worldwide.

Despite local pushback, Brian Mast supports dismantling the U.S. Agency for Global Media, including Radio Martí.

“The U.S. Agency for Global Media, its outlets and its grantees are blatant examples of how the far left has hijacked your money and your agencies to support terrorist sympathizers, give cover to the CCP, and push anti-American propaganda at home and abroad,” Mast said.

“For years, USAGM’s leaders have ignored serious concerns about fraud, corruption, and their failure to uphold American ideals. President Trump, Kari Lake, and the Foreign Affairs Committee are going to act. If one dollar comes out of your pocket, it has to be explained how that money is better used abroad than in your own wallet — and if we can’t defend it, we will defund it.”

Energy enthusiasm

The senior Democrat in Florida’s congressional delegation wants to strengthen the economic relationship between the U.S. and Israel and sees energy as a strong conduit.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Weston Democrat, filed the BIRD Energy and U.S.-Israel Energy Center Reauthorization Act, extending the U.S.-Israel energy partnership through 2034.

That partnership calls for research and development collaboration between companies and researchers in both nations on renewable energy and energy efficiency.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz seeks to strengthen U.S.-Israel ties, extending energy partnership through 2034.

“For over a decade, the BIRD Energy program has demonstrated the power of collaboration between the U.S. and Israel in advancing clean energy solutions,” Wasserman Schultz said.

“By reauthorizing and expanding this successful initiative, we are doubling down on our commitment to innovation, energy security and economic growth. This bill will help develop cutting-edge technologies like hydrogen and fusion energy while strengthening our shared energy infrastructure. Investing in this partnership is an investment in a cleaner, more resilient future for both nations.”

She filed the bill with Republican Reps. Buddy Carter of Georgia, Joe Wilson of South Carolina and Democratic Rep. Brad Schneider of Illinois.

“Israel is one of the United States’ strongest allies,” Carter said. “By expanding the mutually beneficial U.S.-Israel Energy Cooperation program, we will continue to grow our strategic partnership, increase our joint energy security, and ensure both nations have access to cutting-edge technology.”

Housing confirmed

Bill Pulte became the latest Florida man sworn into a key post in the Trump administration earlier this month. The Boca Raton resident was sworn in as Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency on March 14 by Vice President JD Vance.

William Pulte was sworn in as Director of Federal Housing Finance Agency, overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The agency’s fifth Director, created amid the Great Recession to oversee Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Bank System, is the grandson of Pulte Homes’ founder. He has been a prominent philanthropist, supporting causes in Florida and Michigan for years.

“I am honored by President Trump’s trust as we usher in a Golden Age of housing and mortgage accessibility,” Pulte said.

“Safe and sound housing markets are the foundation of American homeownership, so I will be laser-focused on the safety and soundness of our regulated entities as we ensure that the dream of homeownership becomes a reality for as many Americans as possible.”

On this day

March 5, 1776 — “George Washington earns first Congressional Gold Medal” via the U.S. Navy — Boston was the American headquarters of the British army. After months of preparation, Gen. Washington, Commander of the Continental Army, ordered his men to begin bombarding the city. After a few days of heavy artillery fire, British Gen. William Howe, noticing he and his troops would not be able to defend the city with the decisive positioning of the Continental Army, decided it would be to withdraw. Because of his decisive victory during the Battle of Boston, Washington was awarded the first Congressional Gold Medal by the Continental Congress for his “wise and spirited conduct” in bringing about the British evacuation of Boston.

March 5, 1965 — “Martin Luther King-led march reaches Alabama capital” via The White House — Thousands of people joined along the way to Montgomery, with roughly 25,000 people entering the capital on the final leg of the march. The marchers made it to the entrance of the Alabama State Capitol building, with a petition for Gov. George Wallace. A few months later, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, which President Lyndon B. Johnson signed on Aug. 6. The Voting Rights Act was designed to eliminate legal barriers at the state and local level that prevented African Americans from exercising their right to vote under the 15th Amendment — after nearly a century of unconstitutional discrimination.

___

Peter Schorsch publishes Delegation, compiled by Jacob Ogles, edited and assembled by Phil Ammann and Ryan Nicol.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

U.S. immigration officials look to expand social media data collection

Published

on


U.S. immigration officials are asking the public and federal agencies to comment on a proposal to collect social media handles from people applying for benefits such as green cards or citizenship, to comply with an executive order from President Donald Trump.

The March 5 notice raised alarms from immigration and free speech advocates because it appears to expand the government’s reach in social media surveillance to people already vetted and in the U.S. legally, such as asylum seekers, green card and citizenship applicants — and not just those applying to enter the country. That said, social media monitoring by immigration officials has been a practice for over a decade, since at least the second Obama administration and ramping up under Trump’s first term.

Below are some questions and answers on what the new proposal means and how it might expand social media surveillance.

The Department of Homeland Security issued a 60-day notice asking for public commentary on its plan to comply with Trump’s executive order titled “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats.” The plan calls for “uniform vetting standards” and screening people for grounds of inadmissibility to the U.S., as well as identify verification and “national security screening.” It seeks to collect social media handles and the names of platforms, although not passwords.

The policy seeks to require people to share their social media handles when applying for U.S. citizenship, green card, asylum and other immigration benefits. The proposal is open to feedback from the public until May 5.

“The basic requirements that are in place right now is that people who are applying for immigrant and non-immigrant visas have to provide their social media handles,” said Rachel Levinson-Waldman, managing director of the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program at New York University. “Where I could see this impacting is someone who came into the country before visa-related social media handle collection started, so they wouldn’t have provided it before and now they’re being required to. Or maybe they did before, but their social media use has changed.”

“This fairly widely expanded policy to collect them for everyone applying for any kind of immigration benefit, including people who have already been vetted quite extensively,” she added.

What this points to — along with other signals the administration is sending such as detaining people and revoking student visas for participating in campus protests that the government deems antisemitic and sympathetic to the militant Palestinian group Hamas — Levinson-Waldman added, is the increased use of social media to “make these very high-stakes determinations about people.”

In a statement, a spokesperson for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service said the agency seeks to “strengthen fraud detection, prevent identity theft, and support the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible.”

“These efforts ensure that those seeking immigration benefits to live and work in the United States do not threaten public safety, undermine national security, or promote harmful anti-American ideologies,” the statement continued. USCIS estimates that the proposed policy change will affect about 3.6 million people.

The U.S. government began ramping up the use of social media for immigration vetting in 2014 under then-President Barack Obama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. In late 2015, the Department of Homeland Security began both “manual and automatic screening of the social media accounts of a limited number of individuals applying to travel to the United States, through various non-public pilot programs,” the nonpartisan law and policy institute explains on its website.

In May 2017, the U.S. Department of State issued an emergency notice to increase the screening of visa applicants. Brennan, along with other civil and human rights groups, opposed the move, arguing that it is “excessively burdensome and vague, is apt to chill speech, is discriminatory against Muslims, and has no security benefit.”

Two years later, the State Department began collecting social media handles from “nearly all foreigners” applying for visas to travel to the U.S. — about 15 million people a year.

Artificial intelligence tools used to comb through potentially millions of social media accounts have evolved over the past decade, although experts caution that such tools have limits and can make mistakes.

Leon Rodriguez, who served as the director of USCIS from 2014 to 2017 and now practices as an immigration attorney, said while AI could be used as a first screening tool, he doesn’t think “we’re anywhere close to where AI will be able to exercise the judgment of a trained fraud detection and national security officer” or that of someone in an intelligence agency.

“It’s also possible that I will miss stuff,” he added. “Because AI is still very much driven by specific search criteria and it’s possible that the search criteria won’t hit actionable content.”

“Social media is just a stew, so much different information — some of it is reliable, some of it isn’t. Some of it can be clearly attributed to somebody, some of it can’t. And it can be very hard to interpret,” Levinson-Waldman said. “So I think as a baseline matter, just using social media to make high-stakes decisions is quite concerning.”

Then there’s the First Amendment.

“It’s by and large established that people in the U.S. have First Amendment rights,” she said. This includes people who are not citizens. “And obviously, there are complicated ways that that plays out. There is also fairly broad authority for the government to do something like revoking somebody’s visa, if you’re not a citizen, then there’s steps that the government can take — but by and large, with very narrow exceptions, that cannot be on the grounds of speech that would be protected (by the First Amendment).”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Army Corps gets ready for $20M beach restoration project in Nassau County

Published

on


The Nassau County beach restoration comes after more than $100M was spent on similar projects to the south in 2024.

Nassau County will get a major beach makeover now that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, has approved a $20-million contract for the work.

The Army Corps gave the go ahead this month to the work agreement with Marinex Construction Co. Inc., of Charleston, South Carolina. The “Nassau County Shore Protection Project” will begin May 25. The Army Corps will provide 100% of the funding for the project costs.

“When constructed, the project will provide a holistic defense against future storms, beach erosion and sea level rise. It will foster a more resilient coastline, allowing more efficient and less costly recovery in the wake of any future severe storm impacts, significantly increasing the protection of homes, businesses and infrastructure from coastal storms, while saving taxpayer money,” an Army Corps news release said.

The Nassau County beach restoration will run along much of the Fernandina Beach beachfront. The renourishment will start at Fernandina Beach and run south to the St. Mary entrance channel. It’s about a 4 -mile stretch of coast. Much of the sand used to for pumping onto the beach will be dredged from the South Channel Burrow area, just south of the St. Mary entrance channel about 3 miles off shore.

The project area will see equipment staged in the area of Dolphin Avenue and construction will run all hours of every day until it’s complete. It’s expected to be finished in November, according to Army Corps officials.

The Nassau County renourishment is the latest in beach restoration projects by the Army Corps that have run along the Northeast Florida coast. Similar beach renourishment projects were completed in 2024 in both Duval County to the immediate south of Nassau and in St. Johns County which borders Duval.

Some $32.4 million was spent on the beach renourishment project that ran along most of Duval County’s Atlantic Ocean beachfront last year.

Meanwhile, a combined $70 million was spent on beach restoration projects in St. Johns County in 2024. Much of that work was on the northern coastline of St. Johns covering most of the Ponte Vedra Beach area. The other project ran along Anastasia Island and into St. Augustine Beach.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump roars down multiple paths of retribution as he vowed. Some targets yield while others fight

Published

on


Just one day after Paul Weiss’ deal, Columbia University disclosed policy changes under the threat of losing billions of dollars in federal money. A week later, the venerable law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom cut a deal of its own before it could be hit by an executive order. Before that, ABC News and Meta reached multi-million-dollar settlements to resolve lawsuits from Trump.

“The more of them that cave, the more extortion that that invites,” said Ty Cobb, a White House lawyer in Trump’s first term who has since become a sharp critic. “You’ll see other universities and other law firms and other enemies of Trump assaulted and attacked into submission because of that.”

Some within the conservative legal community, by contrast, say the Republican president is acting within his right.

“It’s the president’s prerogative to instruct the executive branch to do business with companies, law firms or contractors that he deems trustworthy — and the converse is true too,” said Jay Town, a U.S. attorney from Alabama during Trump’s first term. “The president, as the commander in chief, can determine who gets a clearance and who doesn’t. It’s as simple as that.”

Some targets have not given in, with two law firms since the Paul Weiss deal suing to block executive orders. Yet no matter their response, the sanctioned firms have generally run afoul of the White House by virtue of association with prosecutors who previously investigated Trump.

If the negotiations have been surprising, consider that Trump telegraphed his approach during the campaign. For those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution, he told supporters in March 2023.

Less clear was: Retribution for what exactly? Against whom? By what means?

The answers would come soon enough.

Fresh off surviving four federal and state indictments that threatened to sink his political career, and investigations that shadowed his first term in office, Trump came straight for the prosecutors who investigated him and the elite firms he saw as sheltering them.

His Justice Department moved almost immediately to fire the members of special counsel Jack Smith’s team and some prosecutors who handled cases arising from the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021.

The White House followed up with an executive order that stripped security clearances from the lawyers at the law firm of Covington & Burling who have provided legal representation for Smith amid the threat of government investigations. Covington has said it looks forward to “defending Mr. Smith’s interests.”

A subsequent order punished Perkins Coie for its representation of then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton during the 2016 campaign and its part in funding opposition research on Trump that took the form of a dossier containing unsubstantiated allegations about Trump’s ties to Russia.

Its business hanging in the balance, Perkins Coie hired Williams & Connolly, a Washington firm with an aggressive litigation style, to challenge the order. A federal judge said the administration’s action sent “chills down my spine” and blocked portions of it from taking effect. That decision could have been a meaningful precedent for other beleaguered firms.

Except that’s not what happened next.

The chairman of Paul Weiss said it, too, was initially prepared to sue over a March 14 order that targeted the firm in part because a former partner, Mark Pomerantzhad several years earlier overseen an investigation into Trump’s finances on behalf of the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

But the firm also came to believe that even a courtroom victory would not erase the perception among clients that it was “persona non grata” with the administration, its chairman, Brad Karp, later told colleagues in an email obtained by The Associated Press.

The order, Karp said, presented an “existential crisis” for a firm that has counted among its powerhouse representations the NFL and ExxonMobil. Some of its clients signaled they might abandon ship. The hoped-for support from fellow firms never materialized and some even sought to exploit Paul Weiss’ woes, Karp said.

“It was very likely that our firm would not be able to survive a protracted dispute with the Administration,” he wrote.

When the opportunity came for a White House meeting and the chance to cut a deal, he took it, pledging pro bono legal services for causes such as the fight against antisemitism as well as representation without regard to clients’ political affiliation. In so doing, he wrote, “we have quickly solved a seemingly intractable problem and removed a cloud of uncertainty that was hanging over our law firm.”

The outcry was swift. Lawyers outside the firm ridiculed it. More than 140 Paul Weiss alumni signed a letter assailing the capitulation.

“Instead of a ringing defense of the values of democracy, we witnessed a craven surrender to, and thus complicity in, what is perhaps the gravest threat to the independence of the legal profession since at least the days of Senator Joseph McCarthy,” the letter said.

Within days, two other firms, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale, were confronted with executive orders over their affiliation with prosecutors on Robert Mueller’s special counsel team that investigated Trump during his first term. Both sued Friday. WilmerHale, where Mueller is a retired partner, said the order was an “unprecedented assault” on the legal system. After hearing arguments, judges blocked enforcement of key portions of both orders.

Yet that very day, the White House trumpeted a fresh deal with Skadden Arps in which the firm agreed to provide $100 million of pro bono legal services and to disavow the use of diversity, employment and inclusion considerations in its hiring practices.

Trump has expressed satisfaction with his pressure campaign, issuing a directive to sanction lawyers who are seen as bringing “frivolous” litigation against the government. Universities, he marveled, are “bending and saying ‘Sir, thank you very much, we appreciate it.’”

As for law firms, he said, “They’re just saying, ‘Where do I sign?’ Nobody can believe it.’”

Uptown from Paul Weiss’s Midtown Manhattan home base, another elite New York institution was facing its own crucible.

Trump had taken office against the backdrop of disruptive protests at Columbia University tied to Israel’s war with Hamas. The turmoil prompted the resignation of its president and made the Ivy League school a target of critics who said an overly permissive campus environment had let antisemitic rhetoric flourish.

The Trump administration this month arrested a prominent Palestinian activist and legal permanent resident in his university-owned apartment building and opened an investigation into whether Columbia hid students sought by the U.S. over their involvement in the demonstrations.

In a separate action, the administration pulled $400 million from Columbia, canceling grants and contracts because of what the government said was the school’s failure to stamp out antisemitism and demanding a series of changes as a condition for restoring the money or for even considering doing so.

Two weeks later, the then-interim university president, Katrina Armstrong, announced that she would implement nearly all of the changes sought by the White House. Columbia would bar students from protesting in academic buildings, she said, adopt a new definition of antisemitism and put its Middle East studies department under new supervision.

The university’s March 21 rollout of reforms did not challenge the Trump administration’s coercive tactics, but nodded to what it said were “legitimate concerns” raised about antisemitism. The White House has yet to say if it will restore the money.

The Columbia resolution was condemned by some faculty members and free speech advocates.

“Columbia’s capitulation endangers academic freedom and campus expression nationwide,” Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement at the time.

Armstrong on Friday night announced her exit from the position and her return to her post atop the school’s medical center.

Columbia is not Trump’s sole target in academia. Also this month, the administration suspended about $175 million in federal funding for the University of Pennsylvania over a transgender swimmer who last competed for the school in 2022.

Trump had not even taken office on Jan. 20 when one legal fight that could have followed him into office abruptly faded.

In December, ABC News agreed to pay $15 million toward Trump’s presidential library to settle a defamation lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos’ inaccurate on-air assertion that the president-elect had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll.

The following month, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, agreed to pay $25 million to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump against the company after it suspended his accounts following the Jan. 6 riot.

The agreement followed a visit by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to Trump’s private Florida club to try to mend fences. Such a trip may have seemed unlikely in Trump’s first term, or after the Capitol siege made him, briefly, a pariah within his own party. But it’s something other technology, business and government officials have done.

The administration, meanwhile, has taken action against news organizations whose coverage it disagrees with. The White House last month removed Associated Press reporters and photographers from the small group of journalists who follow the president in the pool and other events after the news agency declined to follow Trump’s executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico; a suit by the AP is pending.

And the administration has sought to dismantle Voice of America, a U.S. government-funded international news service. On Friday, a federal judge halted plans to fire more than 1,200 journalists, engineers and other staff who were sidelined after Trump ordered a funding cut.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.