Connect with us

Politics

Winner and Loser of the Week in Florida politics — Week of 3.16.25

Published

on


We’ve got a sibling Special Election showdown in Senate District 15.

After the tragic passing of Sen. Geraldine Thompson last month, rumors began to swirl that Democratic Rep. LaVon Bracy Davis was Thompson’s preferred successor to carry on her legacy.

Bracy Davis this week confirmed her entry into the as-yet-unscheduled Special Election contest, making her announcement alongside Thompson’s daughter and niece.

But here’s something you don’t see every day: Bracy Davis’ brother, former Sen. Randolph Bracy, has also filed for the contest after unsuccessfully challenging Thompson in a Democratic Primary last cycle.

That means the brother-sister duo will be battling against each other, and possibly more candidates, in an August 2026 Primary.

Bracy Davis, for her part, is downplaying the family feud aspect of this contest.

“I love my brother and I wish him well,” Bracy Davis said. “I’m not running against anyone. I am running eventually for the people of Senate District 15.”

Bracy, however, had no such reservations.

“This is a sad day for the Bracy name,” he said. “My sister choosing to run against me dishonors our father’s legacy in every way possible. … I will not disparage our Father; who believed in this family, by debating my sister in any format.”

This isn’t the first evidence of a sibling rivalry. Bracy Davis endorsed Thompson as she defended her seat against former Sen. Bracy last cycle. But rarely do we see these types of battle bleed over onto the ballot.

Now, it’s onto our weekly game of winners and losers.

Winners

Honorable mention: Byron Donalds. We’ve spotlighted Donalds here plenty in recent weeks due to the major momentum he’s accumulated in the 2026 Governor’s race. And that continued this week.

Among the new names supporting Donalds in the nascent contest are U.S. Sen. Rick Scott, U.S. Rep. Vern Buchanan and the Miami Young Republicans.

Scott’s support is no surprise. He and Gov. Ron DeSantis have had a famously frosty relationship for years. So it’s not shocking Scott went ahead and backed Donalds before First Lady Casey DeSantis made a decision on whether to run and continue the DeSantis legacy.

Buchanan’s decision to endorse early was more notable. But like Scott, he backed Donald Trump in the 2024 Presidential Primary over DeSantis.

Aside from Trump’s backing, which Donalds earned earlier this year, any one of these endorsements isn’t going to tilt the scale. But every time a significant name backs Donalds early, it’s just another sign that the party is falling behind him in the coming contest. And it makes it more daunting for the First Lady to mount a challenge.

Will she decide to run anyway, with the hope that her husband’s cache at home can overtake the Trump machine? We’ll see.

Almost (but not quite) the biggest winner: Florida Dems. Look, we’ve been here before. But yet again, Florida Democrats are talking a big game about their chances in two seemingly unwinnable races. And they have the money to back up those claims.

This week saw fundraising reports coming for the Special Elections in Florida’s 1st and 6th Congressional Districts. In CD 1, Democrat Gay Valimont more than tripled Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis’ contributions, $6.5 million to $2.1 million. As of March 12, the close of the latest reporting period, she held $2.1 million to Patronis’ $815,000.

That gap was even more stark in CD 6, where Democrat Josh Weil outraised state Sen. Randy Fine just under $10 million to less than $1 million. Weil held $1.3 million as of March 12, while Fine retained only $93,000.

That’s a ton of money, but a good bulk of it is from out-of-state Democrats angry with the Trump administration and looking to lash out by flipping red districts and possibly handing control of the House back to Democrats.

But when you look at the voting registration numbers, things look grim for Democrats. There are nearly twice as many registered Republicans in CD 6 than there are Democrats. In CD 1, the GOP has more than 2.5 times as many voters available to vote in the April 1 General Election.

Voters, not dollars, cast ballots. And unless Democrats think this flood of cash is going to win over a huge bulk of the registered Republicans in these districts, this money may as well be flushed down the drain.

Crazy things happen in politics. We aren’t going to say there’s zero shot to win these races, but it’s close. And whatever you think Democrats’ chances are, they certainly don’t warrant this flood of dollars that could be saved for actually competitive races.

But the Democratic National Committee is getting on the hype train, promising support for these contests (though notably, the DNC didn’t put a dollar amount on that support).

Again, we’ve been here before. Democrats promise big things, then come up empty (see, basically, the entire 2024 General Election map). If these huge sums of money get wasted yet again, the rest of the country really needs to try to come to grips with the fact that Florida is a red state, and their green should go elsewhere.

But for now, Democrats have hope that they really can pull off this miracle. If they fail yet again, you can be sure we’ll be discussing it here again in a few weeks.

The biggest winner: Ben Albritton. Albritton earned well-deserved honors this week during Rural Counties Day at the Capitol.

The Rural Counties Day Planning Committee granted Albritton its first-ever Bobby Payne Florida Rural Counties Advocacy Award, praising the experienced citrus grower for his advocacy in Tallahassee.

“Throughout his years in office, he has consistently stood up for rural communities, but his actions as Senate President have shown what a true champion he is for our counties,” said Rural Counties Day Planning Committee member Darryl Register, the Executive Director of the Baker County Chamber of Commerce.

“He has made addressing the needs of rural Florida a top priority of his presidency and done so in a thoughtful manner that provides us with the support we need to thrive in ways that also preserve what makes our communities special. President Albritton’s actions have proven he is more than deserving of this award.”

Albritton, now Senate President, certainly has bigger goals during his two-year reign than receiving awards. But there’s no doubt that the fourth-generation farmer appreciated the recognition this week from his community.

And one of those big goals is Albritton’s “Rural Renaissance” package. And there was good news on that front too, with a bill carried by Tallahassee Republican Sen. Corey Simon (SB 110) garnering unanimous approval Wednesday on the Senate floor.

That measure still needs to move through the House, but something tells us Albritton will be able to celebrate passage of that bill soon, adding another accomplishment to his tenure.

Losers

Dishonorable mention: University of South Florida. USF has a DEI problem, with diversity, equity and inclusion policies getting the university into double trouble in recent days.

This past week, a USF doctor was forced to resign after leaked audio saw him bragging about skirting anti-DEI rules in Florida.

Haywood Brown previously served as USF’s Vice President for Institutional Equity. But as the state pushed for educational institutions to end DEI programs, Brown transitioned to become the Associate Vice President of Academic Affairs/

“Even though I eliminated my title, I didn’t eliminate my job,” Haywood said on audio reported by Fox News Digital. “That didn’t change anything that I was doing already.”

He went on to mention his actions were “slippery.” Once word got out, Brown was out of a job.

That gave USF a bad look just days after it was reported that the Trump administration had put USF in its crosshairs as part of an investigation of universities throughout the country.

Apparently at issue is USF’s McKnight Doctoral Fellowship Program, which aims to boost Black and Hispanic faculty hiring. USF says Florida law still permits this scholarship, but the U.S. Department of Education disagrees.

And these are precisely the types of fights we expect to see over the next few years, as the Trump administration seeks to flex its power and intimidate institutions to change. Perhaps USF’s best bet is that Trump winds down the Department so fast that it can’t effectively enforce this probe.

Almost (but not quite) the biggest loser: Miami-Dade County. Are dark days on the horizon for Florida’s most populous county?

Reports emerged this week that Mayor Daniella Levine Cava wrote to government leaders that spending cuts are coming. Revenues are down after an influx of federal cash during the COVID years. And Levine Cava said new spending was required to accommodate newly empowered positions in local government, such as the Sheriff’s Office and Tax Collector.

Levine Cava also mounted a spending surge during her first term in office. The Democrat pushed for a more robust government before cruising to re-election last Summer, cutting against the trend of GOP success across the state, and particularly in Miami-Dade.

But she appears to see the writing on the wall and says work will need to be done to make up revenue shortfalls in the near future.

Pair that with a report that more people are leaving Miami-Dade County on net than any county in Florida, and one wonders what the next few years are going to look like in the home of the 305.

The biggest loser: Fort Myers City Council. Wherever you fall in the discussion of whether a local government should be forced to cooperate with federal immigration efforts, one thing that is crystal clear is that the Fort Myers government played out this debate this week about as poorly as a municipality could.

First, the Council deadlocked 3-3 Monday, with one member absent, when deciding whether to approve a deal to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. That tie killed the deal, and a shitstorm followed.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier threatened Council members who opposed the deal with being removed from office by DeSantis. Facing criticism, Council members rushed to reconsider the vote by the end of the week.

And at the end of it, with multiple members flipping their votes, the Council overwhelmingly approved the arrangement.

We’ve been critical of DeSantis’ heavy-handed approach in suspending officials, though he’s arguably on firmer ground here than in the past given that the Legislature recently approved a law banning sanctuary cities.

And there’s a legitimate argument that if the feds want to deport people, they should provide the manpower to do it. That will likely end up in court and we’ll see where the legal landscape lands when that’s all said and done.

But put simply: Either localities want to fight what they see as overreach and take on whatever slings and arrows they get while doing so, or they see the writing on the wall and go along to avoid any conflict.

Fort Myers officials essentially picked the worst of both options, getting lambasted by critics for a week, opening themselves up to removal, and then backing down anyway.

Why go through the charade in the first place then?

City Council member Darla Bonk put the onus squarely on City Attorney Grant Alley. Bonk said Alley failed to properly inform Council members that not immediately approving the ICE arrangement would make them a de facto sanctuary city and open them up to the Governor’s wrath.

Sorry, have you now watched the news for the last six to 10 years? DeSantis and Trump have been on a warpath about this issue. Such a high-profile rebuke was not going to go unnoticed.

So what we have at the end of it is: hardcore conservatives are unhappy even with the final agreement, because it looked like several of these Council members had to be bullied to, in conservatives’ eyes, do the right thing.

And those who wouldn’t even think twice about going along with these raids are also furious given the eventual capitulation.

Perhaps by voting for this arrangement, these Council members saved themselves from the Governor removing them from office. But it wouldn’t be surprising if some of them lost their jobs anyway based on the outrage they just courted from their community.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ethics report details allegations Cory Mills held contracts with federal agencies after election to Congress

Published

on


The House Ethics Committee has released a report detailing allegations against U.S. Rep. Cory Mills. That report recommends that further investigation will occur.

The Office of Congressional Ethics prepared the report, which revealed specific allegations that Mills, a former defense contractor, “may have entered into, held, or enjoyed contracts with federal agencies while serving in Congress.”

“Prior to being sworn in to Congress, Rep. Mills made a series of public statements regarding his business dealings with U.S. law enforcement agencies and foreign governments over the years,” the report states.

“Government procurement records show companies owned by Rep. Mills have been awarded numerous federal contracts. These contracts primarily consist of purchase orders stemming from the manufacture and delivery of less than lethal ammunitions — products manufactured by the Member-owned entities Pacem Defense, LLC, Pacem Solutions International, LLC and ALS, Inc. — to federal law enforcement agencies and the U.S. Department of Justice.”

Pacem Defense and Pacem Solutions are both companies Mills once owned or had majority stake in, but which now are run by his wife, Rana Al Saadi. As for ALS, the report points at a LinkedIn page that at one point connected that business to Pacem Defense, but Mills never included mention of it in his financial disclosures.

The report also said a deeper investigation should see if Mills left information off financial disclosures or if his campaign accepted excessive contributions in the form of personal loans, which federal law only allows to come from a congressional candidate’s personal funds. It points at Mills disclosing personal loans while he was running for Congress, when he loaned his campaign more than $1.8 million. Over the course of the campaign, Mills also amended reports to show a higher income from Pacem Solutions International.

Mills, for his part, said he will cooperate with any investigation, but characterized the allegations as politically motivated.

The committee in December announced its review of allegations based on a complaint filed by former Republican Primary challenger Michael Johnson, and he said the new report just repeats the same allegations.

“Ethics has not even taken up the complaint and is simply reviewing whether it has merit to even be looked at,” Mills said.

“I’m committed to complying with all laws and ethics rules and was pleased that the Federal Election Commission recently dismissed a complaint with similar allegations also filed by my former primary opponent. We trust the House Ethics Committee will come to a similar conclusion.”

The latest report was released with a standard statement from House Ethics Chair Michael Guest and ranking member Mark DeSaulnier that “the mere fact of conducting further review of a referral, and any mandatory disclosure of such further review, does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred, or reflect any judgment on behalf of the Committee.”

But the further investigation comes amid speculation that Mills may run for Senate next year in a GOP Primary challenge against U.S. Sen. Ashley Moody — and during an unrelated criminal investigation by the Metropolitan Police Department after a woman living at Mills’ Washington home called authorities and alleged physical assault.

Of note, the report does end any scrutiny of some allegations, recommending dismissal of allegations the political committee Cory Mills for Congress had accepted excessive in-kind contributions in the form of credit, or that he had accepted gifts in excess of House rules and limits.

Also, there was one vote by the board against further review of allegations Mills accepted personal loans.

The report was prepared not by the House committee but by the Office of Congressional Ethics, which Mills suggested had a history of bias.

“It’s also worth noting that OCE , which is notorious for being partisan, not affiliated with the Congressional Ethics Committee in the House,” he said.

But he must deal with the investigation as the same time he withers scrutiny over an ongoing criminal investigation by the Metropolitan Police Department. Last month, Iranian American activist Sarah Raviani, co-founder of Iranians for Trump, reported an assault at a Washington apartment complex where both live. Mills has denied allegations.

Meanwhile, Mills has expressed a desire to run for U.S. Senate next year, which would potentially mean a primary challenge against Republican U.S. Sen. Ashley Moody.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida must stay the course on lawsuit abuse reform

Published

on


Over the last few years, Florida enacted landmark legislation that reined in abusive lawsuits, stabilized our insurance markets, and lowered costs for everyday families. Before these reforms, our court system was overwhelmed by frivolous lawsuits, which drove up prices across the state. Yet, these hard-won gains are now under threat of being rolled back by a new bill in the legislature, HB 947, which would turn back the clock on Florida’s progress.

Just a few years ago — before the legislature and Gov. Ron DeSantis took action — our insurance markets were in turmoil. Litigation practices drove up premiums and destabilized the entire legal system. There were no limits on billboard attorneys and no restrictions on the aggressive tactics used by their firms. The end result was skyrocketing costs for everyday Floridians in the form of a hidden tax amounting to $5,700 a year per household – all because of excessive litigation.

 Every time a small business is sued — even if they are not at fault — they are forced to raise their prices to pay for higher insurance premiums.

Taking on the powerful lawyer lobby — the very force President Donald Trump recently called “the strongest lobby in the world”— Florida enacted comprehensive tort reform in recent years that changed the game and leveled the playing field.

Under DeSantis’ leadership, Florida’s pro-freedom agenda and commitment to commonsense reforms have propelled the Sunshine State to earn top rankings for education and the economy. The Florida legislature then stepped forward and enacted a series of laws that have reversed years of insurance market instability. We passed significant home and auto insurance reforms that curbed excessive litigation, ended one-way attorney’s fees, and implemented commonsense consumer protections.

In just a few short years, consumers have reaped the benefits. For example, after our reforms, three of the top auto insurance companies in the state announced significant insurance rate decreases, “marking a dramatic shift from years of increases.” With consumers squeezed by high costs elsewhere, now is not the time to reverse course.

Trial lawyers’ loss was everyday Floridians’ gain. Now in response, they have launched a new effort that would not only undo the important reforms enacted over the past few years but bring us backward. We can’t unwind the progress we’ve made.

The reforms this legislature passed just a few years ago are under attack in the Legislature. HB 947 has been introduced in the House. This bill would undo critical reforms and take money out of the pockets of Florida residents. If the lawyer lobby has their way, HB 947 would take us back to a system where trial lawyers could abuse our legal system and drive up the cost of litigation. The end result? A higher cost of living and doing business in our great state.

Perhaps most concerning are the ways this new bill rolls back the transparency and certainty HB 837 brought with regard to medical billing. This new rollback legislation would remove the accountability in medical bills that legal reform brought to our system and increase consumer costs. Instead of juries basing their findings on the real costs of medical treatment, we would be right back to the fraudulent system of using inflated medical expenses. This would bring about higher costs for consumers.

Elsewhere across the country, states have followed Florida’s lead.

Last week, the Georgia Legislature passed Gov. Brian Kemp’s proposed legislation to end lawsuit abuse and level the playing field. With our neighbors making progress, Florida cannot afford to go back to the bad system of the past. That is exactly what would be ushered in if this rollback legislation passes the Florida Legislature.

Most importantly, Florida consumers and businesses cannot afford it.

If we roll back our successful efforts to end lawsuit abuse, the average consumer will lose out at the expense of the lawyer lobby. The Florida legislature must reject this new bill and say no to the special interests that would benefit at the expense of Florida families across our state.

___

Travis Hutson previously represented SD 7 in the Florida Senate.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Electric vehicles offer Florida a smart, cost-effective path forward

Published

on


President Donald Trump made headlines this month with his strong endorsement of Teslas, even purchasing one in front of the White House. His vocal support for American-made EVs sends a clear message: the future of transportation is electric, and it’s being built right here in the U.S.

That’s great news and a reminder that American-made electric vehicles (EVs) are here to stay.

Throughout his presidency, Trump has championed American manufacturing and innovation and continues to support policies that promote affordability and opportunity.

It’s clear that EVs are rapidly gaining momentum in Florida and across the country, providing an affordable and reliable transportation option. Consumers, businesses, and even government agencies are embracing EVs to reduce costs.

For example, the Leon County Sheriff’s Office recently added a fleet of Teslas, citing cost-effectiveness as the primary reason. Similarly, the City of Tallahassee now operates nearly 50 light-duty electric vehicles, ensuring taxpayers benefit from these savings.

With this growing adoption of EVs, we should prioritize policies that make ownership more accessible and convenient.

Conservatives lead by embracing innovation and ensuring the government doesn’t get in the way. By paving the road for electric vehicles, we empower consumers to make their own choices — and with 250,000+ electric vehicles on Florida roads, it’s clear that more and more Floridians are choosing this option.

While other states have drowned innovation in red tape and bureaucracy, Florida drives consumer choice. We should stay the course and continue finding ways to benefit Florida families.

At the same time, policymakers should continue seeking ways to make EV ownership more affordable and to support American companies and manufacturing—principles that have long been core to conservative leadership.

Florida has already seen significant growth in charging infrastructure, which has been further accelerated thanks to federal funding opportunities. The state now boasts more than 3,600 electric vehicle charging stations open to the public, offering about 11,200 charging ports.

Additionally, Florida lawmakers are now considering smart proposals to use existing funding sources to supplement the state’s transportation trust fund. This would ensure that our roads and infrastructure remain well-funded without unfairly targeting EV drivers. Gov. Ron DeSantis has demonstrated strong leadership with his budget proposal, which takes a common-sense approach to modernizing Florida’s transportation funding while keeping costs fair for families.

State Sens. Nick DiCeglie and Jay Collins each plan to move this priority forward. In the Florida House, Reps Shane Abbott and Fiona McFarland also support efforts to direct existing electricity sales tax revenue to transportation funding.

These are common-sense steps that will allow Florida to invest in the future of transportation while keeping costs manageable for families, and we applaud our state leaders for their proactivity on this crucial issue.

The reality is that technology is always evolving, and transportation is no exception. But what hasn’t changed is the need for affordable and reliable transportation options. The demand is clear, and by embracing smart policies, we can make sure Florida remains at the forefront of this shift.

Supporting EVs isn’t just about individual convenience — it’s about strengthening our economy, bolstering American manufacturing, and ensuring that our infrastructure keeps pace with innovation.

By adopting policies that encourage growth rather than stifle it, we can create a win-win scenario that benefits our communities and our economy.

The future of transportation is here. Let’s make sure Florida leads the way.

___

Zachary Colletti is the executive director of Conservatives for Clean Energy – Florida.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.