Connect with us

Business

The Boeing Starliner astronauts have returned to Earth after nine long months stuck in space—but their $150,000 salary won’t come with overtime

Published

on



  • Two Boeing Starliner astronauts just touched down on Earth after an unexpected nine-month stay at the International Space Station. Most people wouldn’t risk a life of eternal darkness in space for a million dollars—but the astronauts did so for far less: just over $150,000 yearly without overtime or hazard pay. 

The internet has been rife with secondhand anxiety over the Boeing Starliner astronauts being stranded in space for nine months. They initially launched their test flight in June 2024, anticipating the trip would only take over a week. But after several of Boeing’s Starliner capsule Calypso’s thrusters failed during docking, the two astronauts were stuck in orbit until yesterday, March 18, 2025. 

It’s an existential nightmare to most—and no amount of money would convince some people to take the risk of the job. But NASA astronauts like the Boeing Starliner’s Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore brave the profession for quite little: They make an annual salary of $152,258, according to NASA’s 2024 pay rates

Plus, they don’t get overtime or any pay bump for the danger of the situation.

“[There’s] no hazard pay, there’s no overtime, there’s no comp time,” Mike Massimino, a veteran of two Space Shuttle missions, previously told MarketWatch. “There’s no financial incentive to stay in space longer.”

A NASA spokesperson confirmed with Fortune that they’re paid a 40-hour-per-week salary, with no additional pay for holiday or weekends—despite the fact that they’re literally at work after work.

They added that the astronauts receive incidental amounts for each day they’re in space—but since they’re on long-term temporary duty, it’s only about $5 per day. That’s about $1,430 for the entire 286-day stay. 

“When NASA astronauts are aboard the International Space Station, they receive regular 40-hour workweek salaries,” NASA told Fortune in a statement. “While in space, NASA astronauts are on official travel orders as federal employees, so their transportation, lodging, and meals are provided.”

The salary would be adjusted to reflect wage increases in 2025, but the Boeing Starliner astronauts spent most of their nine months in orbit during 2024. In comparison to other high-paying jobs with little to zero danger, this wage can feel disproportionate to the risk. 

But Williams and Wilmore knew that risks like their nine-month hiccup came with the territory, and actually refuted the notion that they were left out to dry. It’s a part of their job that they’ve comfortably settled into.

“That’s been the rhetoric. That’s been the narrative from day one: stranded, abandoned, stuck—and I get it. We both get it,” Wilmore said in an interview with CNN last month. “But that is, again, not what our human spaceflight program is about. We don’t feel abandoned, we don’t feel stuck, we don’t feel stranded.”

It’s a dangerous job—but astronauts have their own motivation

When most people think of six-figure jobs, they think of cushy white-collar gigs in temperature-controlled offices. It might be a no-brainer to go into law, consulting, or banking—seeing as there’s no bodily risk on the table for those careers. 

By comparison, bankers in New York make an average of $111,000 annually, without the risk of being exposed to an indefinite stay in dark, noiseless, uninhabited space. Consultants in the same area could rake in $137,000, providing advice to clients from the comfort of their offices or couches. And even the average sales professional in the city can make over $200,000 with no inherent risk of harm in generating leads and selling products.

But astronauts probably aren’t motivated by money. It’s been a long-held dream career for many—despite new professions like YouTubers and video game creators taking flight, over 10% of U.K. and U.S. kids still dream of becoming astronauts. That role was one of the top five career aspirations for U.S. children, according to a 2019 study from Lego.

Astronauts like Williams and Wilmore are veterans of their craft—and the nine months they’ve spent at the space station have been dedicated to upkeep and research. They’ve been busy inspecting hardware, arranging cargo, aiding in science tests, performing tech demonstrations, and checking in on the Starliner. Wilmore helped configure a new airlock, and Williams has been testing out athleticism in low-orbit’s zero gravity. Their work at the International Space Station is improving NASA’s knowledge base—and helping upkeep an essential destination for astronauts. 

Their passion for space exploration makes a $150,000 salary seem worth it. It’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to go to space and be the universe traveler many people have fantasized about becoming. While the Boeing Starliner fiasco may seem like a nightmare to some, for astronauts it simply means going even longer on the job they love.

As Ken Bowersox, space operations mission chief and former NASA astronaut, said last week: “Every astronaut that launches into space, we teach them don’t think about when you’re coming home. Think about how well your mission’s going and if you’re lucky, you might get to stay longer.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Microsoft’s memorable cultural legacies at 50, from Clippy to the Blue Screen of Death

Published

on



Providing ubiquitous desktop software for decades, Microsoft has come in for jibes, mockery and even loathing even as it has helped millions of people get things done.

Every design decision is felt around the world for better or worse — often staying with people for years as a fond memory or a meme.

Here are a few of the ways Microsoft has marked computing culture:

Blue Screen of Death

A fixture since the very first versions of Windows — if mercifully much rarer these days — the Blue Screen of Death, or BSOD, is displayed when Microsoft’s operating system encounters a fatal error in a programme, or the application becomes unresponsive.

It has most commonly been a full blue screen with white text — originally composed by Steve Ballmer, who later went on to head the company — warning of the problem.

Some versions of the screen include error codes to help power users figure out what has gone wrong.

More recent editions of Windows have added a sad-face smiley in an apparent bid to sympathise.

While it has often offered the option to continue working by closing the programme or restarting the computer, many users have found the only way to escape it is by manually turning the machine off and on again.

Blissful background

In a breath of fresh air from previous versions of Windows, users booting up the 2001 “XP” edition were presented with a vision of lush, sun-dappled hills under a vivid blue sky.

For many who grew up using computers in the 1990s and 2000s, the idyllic desktop background now recalls a simpler time of after-school gaming or using still-novel online chat programmes to talk with friends.

Wine industry photographer Chuck O’Rear took what has been called “the world’s most-viewed picture” in 1996, after driving by a spot in California’s Sonoma County where vines had been torn up to fight the phylloxera pest.

Dubbed “Bliss”, the background can still be spotted in the wild today on systems that have not been updated in a while, and has spawned endless memes, parodies and now AI imaginings of what the rest of the scene might look like.

Inviting melodies

2001 was far from the beginning of Microsoft’s attempts to craft a soothing environment for PC users.

The 1995 edition of the operating system played ethereal startup chimes as the machine laboured into life.

Windows 95’s enchanting startup sound was crafted by electronic music legend Brian Eno, who told news site SFGate in 1996 that the piece was like “a tiny little jewel”.

Commissioned to make it “inspiring, universal, blah-bah, da-da-da, optimistic, futuristic, sentimental, emotional,” Eno composed 84 clips before selecting the best — which was twice as long as the original three-and-a-quarter-second brief.

‘Helpful’ Clippy

Long before ChatGPT was helping to write essays or generate emails, Microsoft tried to back up users of its Office productivity suite with smart software.

From the late 1990s, an “Office Assistant” interactive animated character would pop up to offer help with the task it believed was at hand.

The best-remembered is chirpy paperclip “Clippy”, whose often mistaken assumption that Word users needed help writing letters spawned a million memes.

Assistant emerged from research suggesting that users experienced interactions with a computer like working with human colleagues.

It was a “truly tragic misunderstanding” of the study, interaction designer Alan Cooper later said.

“If people are going to react to computers as though they’re humans, the one thing you don’t have to do is anthropomorphise them,” he told broadcaster G4TV.

Nevertheless, nostalgics can find Clippy as the face of a ChatGPT-powered assistant for Windows 11 built by developers FireCube.

Secret flight simulator

Microsoft produces a highly detailed and well-loved series of games simply called “Flight Simulator” with recreations of real locations and aircraft.

Office workers without a joystick or high-end graphics card, though, could escape into a bizarre neon-tinged hilly landscape that they could fly around using only the mouse via a series of hidden inputs in Excel 97.

The scene, which also included the credits for the spreadsheet programme, is just one of dozens of hidden “Easter eggs” scattered through the company’s software over the decades.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator on capital markets vs the media

Published

on



  • In today’s CEO Daily: Diane Brady talks to CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator.
  • The big story: Markets fall worldwide as tariff “Liberation Day” approaches.
  • The markets: It’s grim out there.
  • Analyst notes from UBS, Bank of America, EY, and Apollo on tariffs and the economy.
  • Plus: All the news and watercooler chat from Fortune.

Good morning. The performance of an IPO can reflect broad market sentiment or narrow investor enthusiasm for the company being listed—or a bit of both. There were a lot of eyes on CoreWeave’s Nasdaq debut on Friday, which closed flat at its scaled-back IPO price of $40 a share. Some saw the underwhelming performance of the Nvidia-backed AI cloud-computing provider as a bad sign for tech IPOs and AI, while others, including my colleague Jeremy Kahn, believe the reaction to CoreWeave reflects the challenges of being CoreWeave

Maybe it’s a bit of both. I spoke with CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator on Friday about the New Jersey-based company’s much-scrutinized debut. He said they had scaled back the price and size of the stock offer because of “broader market headwinds,” describing the IPO as “a means to an end” for the company to grow.

“It puts us on the path towards what we need to accomplish as a business,” he said. “A little bigger, a little smaller, a little higher, a little lower. That’s not going to matter. What’s going to matter is: how do we execute on our business?”

That is a topic of much debate. Being a public company could drive down the cost of accessing debt markets, but CoreWeave’s capital-intensive model and existing debt burden unnerves some investors. The company has borrowed $8 billion to build out data centers that run graphics processing units (GPUs) provided by Nvidia. Servicing that debt is likely to cost at least $1 billion this year, which puts the $1.5 billion it raised through Friday’s IPO in perspective.

CoreWeave also relies heavily on one customer—Microsoft, which accounted for 62% of its revenue last year. Besides that, the company is betting heavily on a class of Nvidia chips that could be disrupted by newer models. And then there’s the question of whether we’re in a data center bubble, which Intrator dismisses.

“There’s a divergence between what the capital markets and what the media is thinking, and what I am feeling down in the trenches. What I am feeling is relentless demand,” he says. “I know what my clients want. I know the type of infrastructure they need. I know the type of scale that they’re requesting, and I build for them. Over time, I will be able to generate enormous value for my investors. I don’t really care where it is today or tomorrow or the day after.”

You can read my full interview with Intrator here

More news below.

Contact CEO Daily via Diane Brady at diane.brady@fortune.com

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Primark boss steps down after 16 years due to inappropriate ‘behaviour toward a woman’

Published

on

Primark chief executive Paul Marchant has resigned following a company investigation into his behaviour toward a woman “in a social environment”, the budget fashion chain’s owner Associated British Foods announced Monday.

His resignation, which takes immediate effect, comes after he spent 16 years as Primark’s CEO, overseeing its expansion in Europe and into the United States.

“Marchant cooperated with the investigation, acknowledged his error of judgement and accepts that his actions fell below the standards expected by ABF,” the company said in a statement.

“He has made an apology to the individual concerned,” the group added.

ABF said it continues to offer support to the person who brought his behaviour to its attention.

The group did not immediately provide further details when contacted by AFP.

“I am immensely disappointed,” George Weston, chief executive of ABF, said in the statement.

He added that “our culture has to be, and is, bigger than any one individual”.

Marchant will be replaced on an interim basis by Eoin Tonge, ABF’s chief financial officer.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.