Connect with us

Business

Europe targets Apple and Google in antitrust crackdown, risking fresh Trump tariff clash

Published

on



In a move that risks enraging the Trump administration, the European Commission has announced major antitrust enforcement decisions against Google and Apple.

The EU’s executive body on Wednesday said Google parent Alphabet had almost certainly broken the bloc’s Digital Markets Act, a year-old competition rulebook for Big Tech, in multiple ways. If it finalizes these preliminary findings, Google could be in line for fines that theoretically run as high as 10% of global annual revenues.

The Commission also ordered Apple to comply with the DMA by making the iPhone more easily and effectively interoperable with third-party devices such as smartwatches, headphones, and TV sets. This is the first time the Commission has given a company specific measures that it must take to comply with this law.

President Donald Trump last month threatened to lob tariffs at anyone who dares to fine or enforce tech rules against U.S. companies in ways that his administration thinks are discriminatory. (He has already triggered a tariff war with Europe and the rest of the world regarding steel and aluminum imports, and has threatened further tariffs on European alcohol.)

Vice President JD Vance has also hit out at European tech regulation, and Meta and Apple—both of which face separate EU antitrust decisions as soon as this month—have complained to Trump about being picked on in Europe.

The Commission’s preliminary findings about Alphabet’s DMA non-compliance are about two long-running issues.

The first relates to Google search results promoting other Google services, like shopping, hotel booking, and financial results, to the detriment of third-party competitors—either by putting the Google services at the top of the results, or by displaying them in eye-catching dedicated spaces. The EU already fined Google $2.7 billion for similar self-preferencing eight years ago, but now it has a new law to wield.

The second finding is about Google not allowing developers who distribute their Android apps through Google Play to tell customers about cheaper deals that they can get off Google’s platform, and to freely steer them there. The Commission also said Google is charging developers too much for onboarding new customers. Again, Google already received a $5 billion EU antitrust fine for Android abuses back in 2018, but that was about preinstalled services on Android phones; the newer case is specific to the rules in the DMA.

“The two preliminary findings we adopt today aim to ensure that Alphabet abides by EU rules when it comes to two services widely used by businesses and consumers across the EU, Google Search and Android phones,” said Competition Commissioner Teresa Ribera.

As for Apple, the company will now have to heavily change its ways to comply with the DMA.

For example, Apple has long made life difficult for rival smartwatch makers by ensuring that users of their products can’t reply to notifications coming in from their iPhones. (Pebble founder Eric Migicovsky, who has just revived his discontinued smartwatch under the Core brand, wrote a blog post about his Apple frustrations just this week.)

Apple will now have to fix that, and it will also have to allow for easier pairing and better data connections with third-party headphones and virtual-reality headsets. Developers will also get new opportunities to integrate file-sharing and streaming capabilities in their iPhone apps. And Apple will have to give developers more transparent and timely information when they want to make their products and services interoperable with the iPhone and iPad.

“Today’s decisions wrap us in red tape, slowing down Apple’s ability to innovate for users in Europe and forcing us to give away our new features for free to companies who don’t have to play by the same rules,” Apple said in an emailed statement. “It’s bad for our products and for our European users. We will continue to work with the European Commission to help them understand our concerns on behalf of our users.”

Google, meanwhile, complained that the Commission’s findings would “make it harder for people to find what they are looking for and reduce traffic to European businesses.”

The Commission officials who announced Wednesday’s decisions took great care to imply that nobody was being treated unfairly on the basis of their American-ness.

Although Apple complained that it was being singled out by the Commission’s latest move, Ribera stressed that the Commission was “simply implementing the law” with its Apple decisions. Similarly, tech commissioner Henna Virkkunen emphasized that Alphabet’s alleged misdeeds “negatively impact many European and non-European businesses.”

That is unlikely to placate the U.S. leadership, whose response is now keenly awaited.

After all, Apple also claimed that the new interoperability requirements force it to give away its intellectual property to competitors. And Trump’s memorandum last month specifically said that rules designed to “transfer significant funds or intellectual property from American companies to the foreign government or the foreign government’s favored domestic entities” would trigger U.S. tariffs.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

TON surges 24% as Telegram founder Pavel Durov returns home to Dubai amid ongoing investigation

Published

on



While the crypto markets continued to take a beating over the weekend, one coin is actually gaining ground. TON, which is associated with messaging app Bitcoin stayed flat.

“As you may have heard, I’ve returned to Dubai after spending several months in France due to an investigation related to the activity of criminals on Telegram,” Durov wrote on Telegram. “The process is ongoing, it feels great to be home.”

Durov will be required to return to France by Apr. 7. 

Telegram began to develop TON—also known as The Open Network—in 2017, to allow its rapidly growing user base to quickly process transactions in the app using blockchain technology. It is now an integral part of the platform, used to pay for games, advertisements and transaction fees. It has amassed a market cap of over $8 billion. 

Telegram and alleged criminal activities

Durov had been banned from leaving France since August after he was arrested near Paris last year.  

Telegram has attracted nearly one billion global users since it was founded in 2013 through its emphasis on privacy and security. It was the company’s policy to not comply with government requests for user information until September when Durov reversed this policy in the wake of his arrest. French authorities say the app has been used for the distribution of child sexual abuse material, drug trafficking, fraud and other criminal activities. 

Telegram previously said it was “absurd” to hold Durov responsible for criminal activities that occur on Telegram in a X post following his arrest. “It is absurd to claim that a platform or its owner are responsible for abuse of that platform,” the company wrote, adding that its moderation practices are “within industry standards and constantly improving.” The company did not immediately respond to Fortune‘s request for comment.

Durov’s arrest prompted backlash from the likes of Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin and U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden, who said the move was a politically-motivated attack on freedom of speech. 

Durov has maintained his innocence throughout the investigation, writing on Telegram on Monday: “When it comes to moderation, cooperation, and fighting crime, for years Telegram not only met but exceeded its legal obligations.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Finland is the world’s happiest country yet again. Here are the top 10 on the list

Published

on



It’s a good day to be a Finn—again

For the 8th successive year, Finland ranks no.1 on the annual World Happiness Report. The report, published on the UN’s International Day of Happiness, is based on analysis of how the residents of over 140 countries rate their quality of life. With 10 meaning someone is currently living the best possible life they can imagine, Finns came in first with an average score of 7.74. 

“They’re wealthy, they’re healthy, have social connections, social support, [and] a connection with nature,” Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, professor of economics at the University of Oxford, leader of the Wellbeing Research Center and editor of The World Happiness Report, tells Fortune. “They’re not happy, joyful, dancing in the streets type people, but they’re very content with their lives.”

Finland was followed by Denmark (no.2), Iceland (no.3), Sweden (no.4), and the Netherlands (no.5). While Mexico (no.10) and Costa Rica (no.6) joined the top 10 for the first time in the list’s history, the U.S. dropped to its lowest ranking at no. 24. Last year, the U.S. dropped out of the top 20 for the first time since the 2012 inaugural list. 

The Nordic countries, historically at the top, are getting happier while the U.S. is getting less happy. While GDP per capita is relatively similar across the Nordic countries, the U.S., Australia, and the UK, the distribution of wealth sets them apart. 

“In these Nordic Scandinavian countries, a rising tide lifts all boats, so the levels of economic inequality are much less, and that reflects in well-being as well,” De Neve says. “In Finland, most people will rate themselves as seven or an eight, whereas if you look at the distribution of well-being in the States, there’s a lot of 10s out there, but there’s a lot of ones as well.”

While the rankings factored in a country’s GDP per capita, wealth distribution, and life expectancy, they found social trust and connection help determine happiness more than people may think. 

This year, the researchers found a strong correlation between someone believing in the kindness of others and their own perceived happiness. Across the board, too often, people underestimate the kindness of others, like, say, if someone will return a lost wallet. It affects well-being. Wallets are returned to their owner at almost twice the rate people assume. However, compared to the U.S., more people in Nordic countries believe a lost wallet will be returned (and more people are likely to return it).  

Maintaining a strong sense of community with acts such as regularly dining with others, for example, improves social trust and happiness, the report found. “The more you believe in the kindness of others, or in other words, are socially trusting, the higher your individual well-being and the higher collective well-being,” De Neve says. “The Nordic countries, the Scandinavian countries, do better, both in the belief in others’ kindness and in the actual wallet drop.” 

As for Mexico and Costa Rica joining the top 10 for the first in the list’s history, De Neve points to the strength of the countries’ social fabrics. Latin American countries reported the highest number of shared meals and ranked high on social connectedness and trust. It helps explain why their rankings dipped more dramatically in the COVID-19 isolation years (De Neve says that 13 out of 14 meals shared across seven days correlated to the highest well-being measure).

“It is not because of high GDP and the highest life expectancy,” De Neve says about these two countries. “They do spend time dining and lunching with others, having friends, and it’s not all cannibalized by social media, and so we picked this up in the data.” 

The report is published yearly by the Wellbeing Research Centre at the University of Oxford, alongside partners, including Gallup, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, and an editorial board that analyzes the findings pro bono.  

As De Neve dug into why Finland kept its reign, something else came to light that helped them stand out even from their Nordic counterparts. 

“They’re content with less,” he says. “They had less, and they’re more content with less. So they’re happier with what they’ve got.” 

Here are the world’s 25 happiest countries

  1. Finland
  2. Denmark
  3. Iceland
  4. Sweden
  5. Netherlands
  6. Costa Rica 
  7. Norway 
  8. Israel 
  9. Luxembourg
  10. Mexico 

For more on happiness:

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Unilever hit ‘new levels of oppressiveness,’ Ben & Jerry’s claims as its CEO was sacked over social activism

Published

on



Ben & Jerry’s has filed yet another legal complaint against its parent company, the consumer goods giant Unilever, claiming that it sacked Ben & Jerry’s CEO after a standoff on political issues.

In its latest complaint, filed late Tuesday in a New York federal court, Ben & Jerry’s alleges that Unilever has threatened staff who oppose its efforts to “silence the social mission.”

David Stever had been with Ben & Jerry’s for 34 years—as a tour guide, as CMO, and then as CEO. The Vermont-based ice cream brand claimed that Stever was not fired for performance reasons but because he didn’t comply with Unilever’s standards on not speaking out about political issues. 

Unilever then “informed the Independent Board” that Stever would be replaced as Ben & Jerry’s CEO on Mar. 3, 2025. 

The move hindered “the CEO’s duties, purposely undermining Ben & Jerry’s Social Mission and Brand Integrity,” the filing said. 

Ben & Jerry’s added that Unilever’s control over its social mission had hit “new levels of oppressiveness.”

A Unilever spokesperson said the company followed due processes in the removal of Ben & Jerry’s CEO.

“Regrettably, despite repeated attempts to engage the Board and follow the correct process, we are disappointed that the confidentiality of an employee career conversation has been made public,” the spokesperson said.


Representatives at Ben & Jerry’s didn’t immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

A complex legal web

The ice cream brand and its much larger parent company have repeatedly sparred over issues in recent times. Ben & Jerry’s was founded in 1978 with social causes at its heart. 

Even after Unilever bought Ben & Jerry’s in 2000, the brand didn’t shy away from having progressive viewpoints that drifted away from its parent company’s stance. It has spoken out against GMO ingredients in its ice cream pints and supported the Black Lives Matter movement, among others. 

The recent clashes began in 2021 when Ben & Jerry’s said it wouldn’t sell its products in the Israel-occupied West Bank. That resulted in customer anger against Unilever, which was accused of being anti-Semitic in allowing such a move. 

The FTSE100 company, which had a turnover of €61 billion in 2024 and operates in 190 countries, suddenly found itself in a bind managing the “purpose-led” Ben & Jerry’s social and political takes. 

A year later, Ben & Jerry’s sued Unilever because its parent company planned to sell the Israeli operations of Ben & Jerry’s to a local licensee, allowing its ice creams to continue to be marketed in the war-torn region. The lawsuit also said Unilever’s move would breach its 2000 acquisition deal, which let Ben & Jerry’s continue with its social mission. The consumer giant sold its Israeli Ben & Jerry’s arm in 2022, and Unilever and Ben & Jerry’s settled. 

But the friction didn’t end there. In 2024, Ben & Jerry’s filed a fresh lawsuit against Unilever claiming “inappropriate muzzling” when it wanted to support Palestinian refugees amid the war in Gaza. The filing said that Unilever even threatened to dismantle the Ben & Jerry’s board and sue individual members if Ben & Jerry’s advocated for a cease-fire. 

Unilever rejected this claim, arguing it “will defend our case very strongly,” according to Bloomberg. 

In January, Ben & Jerry’s accused Unilever of suppressing its release of a social policy statement because it mentioned President Donald Trump. Claims about the brand’s CEO being ousted are just the latest in a stream of legal complaints.

This complex David-and-Goliath tussle is unfolding just as Unilever announced plans last month to spin off its entire ice cream business, including Magnum and Ben & Jerry’s, through a triple listing.

Ben & Jerry’s founders are reportedly considering buying the ice cream brand back, Bloomberg reported last month. But Unilever said it “wasn’t for sale” and would be part of its soon-to-be ice cream entity.

Update, March 19, 2025: This article has been updated with a comment from Unilever.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.