Connect with us

Politics

‘Pro-consumer’ insurance bill flies through first Senate stop with unanimous support

Published

on


Legislation to more tightly constrain insurers and their executives in Florida while safeguarding consumers from judgments based solely on artificial information is advancing in the Legislature’s upper chamber.

Members of the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee just voted 7-0 for SB 1740, which Naples Republican Sen. Kathleen Passidomo described as a “pro-consumer insurance bill” designed to reduce premiums, decrease insurer insolvency and “hold insurers accountable for (their) prior, poor decisions.”

Spring Hill Republican Sen. Blaise Ingoglia filed the measure, but left the Banking and Insurance Committee meeting, which he chairs, before the bill was heard. Passidomo presented the measure in his absence.

SB 1740 would prohibit an insurance executive whose company went insolvent from holding an executive position in another insurance company for five years. The current prohibition is only for two years.

The bill would more than double the amount of capital needed to start a domestic insurance company in Florida from $15 million to $35 million, among other increases.

It would also require that any money given through Florida’s house-hardening My Safe Florida Home program must be used for a project that results in a mitigation credit from insurers to homeowners that reduce their premiums.

Passidomo introduced — and the committee approved — an amendment to the bill to provide that artificial intelligence cannot be used as the sole determination to deny an insurance claim. An “actual human being” would have to be involved in the process, Passidomo said, crediting Fleming Island Republican Sen. Jennifer Bradley’s bill on AI in health insurance (SB 794) for inspiring the proposed change.

Adam Basford of Associated Industries of Florida told the panel Monday that his group has been working to assemble a coalition of its members and business partners to examine AI and its implications on Florida industries. He urged lawmakers to focus on striking a balance between ensuring safety in “high-risk areas” while being mindful to not obstruct innovation.

“We need to be very careful about allowing for those efficiencies while making sure we regulate it the right way,” he said.

Insurance rates have skyrocketed in recent years, outpacing inflation and driving lawmakers to hold Special Sessions and carry numerous bills to address the issue. Last month, Gov. Ron DeSantis announced premium rate reductions in some areas of the state, but many others still await relief.

Massive costs after severe storms like last year’s Hurricane Milton saw some insurance companies leave the state as Florida’s state-run insurer, Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, canceled residents’ policies as part of its “depopulation” program.

But the situation may not be as dire for insurance companies as they’ve led on.

A 2022 study the Tampa Bay Times obtained after a two-year wait for public records found that as Florida insurers claimed to be losing money, their parent companies and affiliates made billions, including $680 million in shareholder dividends. The study’s author concluded most insurance executives in Florida violated state regulations.

The report was never given to state lawmakers.

SB 1740, which Davie Democratic Sen. Barbara Sharief is co-sponsoring, will next go to the Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment and General Government. It has one more committee stop after that before reaching a floor vote.

Its House companion (HB 1433) by Marco Island Republican Rep. Yvette Benarroch awaits a hearing before the first of three committees to which it was referred.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Gov. DeSantis urges local governments to play ball with Florida DOGE audits

Published

on


Gov. Ron DeSantis is urging counties in Florida to follow Bay County’s lead and “step up and ask” for audits from the state-level DOGE his administration established.

Noting that his administration is “working with the Florida Legislature to get more prescriptive authority to be able to go in and conduct audits of these local governments so that taxpayers get the full picture of what’s going on,” he credits “counties that are willing to step up and ask for these audits” with “really leading by example.”

DeSantis has often said Florida “was DOGE before DOGE was cool.” Yet in the wake of the Elon Musk led Department of Governmental Efficiency taking root, the Governor rolled out a state-level task force via Executive Order 25-44 to “DOGE at the local level,” taking a look at “publicly available” budget records and auditing.

As he has previously, DeSantis painted a picture of local budgets larded by hikes in property taxes.

“We’ve seen property tax assessments go up across Florida at the local level,” he said. “Taxpayers are pinched, they’re paying more than they ever have. Even though we have homestead exemption, it hasn’t been enough to fully protect taxpayers. Shouldn’t you know how this money is being spent, especially in those counties that have seen dramatic increases in their state budgets?”

Higher taxes have “pinched” senior citizens whose home value may have appreciated over the years, he said.

“Now they’re being told it’s worth so much more and they have to pony up more and more money. It’s almost like they have to pay rent to the government just to be able to enjoy their property. and that’s wrong. and we need to do something about it.”

For now, the Governor wants cities and counties to work with his group on a “voluntary” basis.

“We really hope to be able to deliver some serious, serious audits working with the Florida legislature of what’s going on in these local governments. I thank Bay County for what they did and I know there’s going to be other counties that are going to step up to the plate,” DeSantis said.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Obscene heckler doesn’t stop bill targeting ‘academic boycott’ of Israel from advancing in Senate

Published

on


The Senate Governmental Oversight and Accountability Committee was the first Senate panel to approve Sen. Tom Leek’s measure (SB 1678) which would defend Israel against its opponents in schools and non-governmental agencies.

That bill suggests anti-Israeli actions undertaken by “an educational institution, a nonprofit organization, an agency, a local governmental entity or unit thereof, or a foreign government” amount to an “academic boycott.”

It urges cessation of state contracts and grants with those entities on the wrong side of the ideological conflict if they don’t change their ways.

These entities would have 90 days to correct their noncompliance and be removed from what would be called the Scrutinized Companies or Other Entities that Boycott Israel List under this proposal. Otherwise, the state would divest itself of contracts with them.

Even before Leek could speak, a member of the crowd called the bill “f****** b*******.” She was immediately excused from the room.

A delete all amendment clarified that public funds, such as the State Board of Administration or State University System, cannot invest in these companies. Additionally, it requires that Arts and Culture grants not go to support antisemitic work.

The bill would also target agreements, like foreign exchange programs, with foreign universities deemed to be supporting antisemitism.

Members of the public complained about the legislation, saying it restricted “academic freedom” and offered support to an Israeli regime they find objectionable.

However, others said the bill was necessary.

Miami Beach City Commissioner David Suarez noted the Boycott Divestment and Sanction movement was targeting cities like his, and the legislation was a way to counter “hateful campaigns from a noisy minority.”

Chair Randy Fine hailed Leek for carrying the bill, saying he’d worried about leaving Tallahassee and having no one carry this kind of legislation,

Leek’s bill has two more committee references.

Rep. Hillary Cassel’s bill (HB 1519) the companion legislation, also has two stops in the House. But it has yet to have a committee hearing.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate bill that could lead to execution of would-be political assassins begins to move

Published

on


The bill was inspired by the violence at a Donald Trump rally in Pennsylvania.

Those looking to harm Presidents, Governors and other heads of state may pay the ultimate price in Florida — even if they don’t succeed in killing their target.

Sen. Blaise Ingoglia’s measure (SB 776) which cleared the Criminal Justice Committee, contemplates adding to Florida law that the death sentence can be issued when a “capital felony was committed against the head of a state, including, but not limited to, the President or the Vice President of the United States or the Governor of this or another state, or in an attempt to commit such crime a capital felony was committed against another individual.”

Ingoglia noted that “the death penalty is reserved for those convicted of heinous crimes” and that his helps to facilitate that by adding aggravating factors of an assassination of a head of state or the killing of another person in attempting to do so. He described the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and the concomitant killing of Corey Comperatore as heinous and worthy of extraordinary sanction in law.

One citizen opposed the bill.

Grace Hannah of Floridians Opposed to the Death Penalty said the bill would fall under federal jurisdiction and that an incident like that contemplated by the bill is “extremely rare.”

The bill is also moving in the House.

Jeff Holcomb’s legislation (HB 653) has one stop to go before the floor.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.