Connect with us

Politics

Everyone is accountable for protecting children online

Published

on


The debate surrounding online age verification is mired in finger-pointing, blame, and polarization — articles dissect how to implement it, who should be responsible, and which tech giant is shifting responsibility to another. But amid all this noise, the core question is lost: What do children need to stay safe online?

Protecting children online isn’t about assigning blame or catering to corporate interests. It’s about ensuring children are better shielded from harm in a digital world. Just as we prioritize their safety in the physical world, we must do the same in the online spaces they inhabit—because today, online life is real life.

In 2024, the Florida Legislature courageously began protecting our children after years of relying on big tech’s voluntary measures to safeguard kids online.

SB 1438 by Sen. Erin Grall and HB 931 by Majority Leader Tyler Sirois present a clear path forward in taking the necessary steps to protect our children. These essential bills allow us to hold companies that serve as gateways to the internet for our children accountable. Under these measures, device manufacturers, operating systems, app stores, and online platforms all share responsibility for safeguarding children.

The requirement is straightforward: devices must verify age, and the apps and websites children visit must recognize and act on that age signal following the law. These bills also empower the Attorney General to enforce accountability across all involved stakeholders, leaving no room for loopholes.

Consider this: Every online experience begins with a device. That device, powered by an operating system, leads to app stores and web browsers, which, in turn, provide access to apps and websites. Just a handful of companies control these pathways, influencing the entire ecosystem of online destinations. To protect children, these gatekeepers must fulfill their role. Excluding websites and apps from accountability would be a mistake, but leaving out device manufacturers, operating systems, and app stores would be equally shortsighted. True accountability and improved child safety must include every link in the chain.

Device-based age verification offers the most effective, universal solution. It works across companies, platforms, and standards while providing the strongest privacy and security protections for all users, not just children.

Without robust age verification, we cannot adequately protect kids. The alarming statistics evidencing harm to children online indicate that our kids cannot wait. Instead of fixating on which companies should bear the responsibility, let’s focus on what children need. Accountability is key, and the time has come to establish accountability for the companies children interact with on the internet.

The tech industry has had years to address this issue, and while there has been progress, we still have a long way to go. Children deserve a solution that works and prioritizes their safety. We need a solution that is not just words on paper but creates actual accountability.

Device-based age verification is that solution. It is effective, comprehensive, and respects user privacy while offering the highest level of protection. It is time to move beyond the blame game. Instead of pitting companies against one another, we must hold all of them accountable. These new laws do just that, ensuring that every company—from device manufacturers to online platforms—shares the responsibility of protecting children.

The time to take the next step has arrived, and the cost of inaction is too high. I urge every Legislature member and the entire community to collaborate with Sen. Grall and Rep. Sirois in their efforts to protect our children and create accountability for those who control the internet. Let’s drown out the noise, finger-pointing, and bickering and create a common-sense, technically sound solution. Our children depend on all of us.

___

Bob Cunningham is the director of Policy Engagement for the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children and a lifelong educator.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida unemployment rate in January shows first increase in months

Published

on


Florida’s jobless rate increased for the first time in about a half year to start 2025.

FloridaCommerce released the January figures showing that the unemployment rate came in at 3.5%. That’s the first increase in about a half year.

The rate held steady at 3.4% for the back half of 2024. Prior to that, the rate remained at 3.3% for most of early last year.

There were 390,000 people out of work in January in Florida out of a total labor force of 11,188,000 people in the state. That total labor force figure is the highest number Florida has ever seen.

“Florida continues to prove that leadership and conservative fiscal policies drive success,” said Gov. Ron DeSantis. “We will keep the momentum going by insisting on reducing government spending, continuing to eliminate bureaucracy, and finding more tax reductions for Floridians.”

While Florida’s jobless rate increased in January, it still remains lower than the national rate, which is 4%. The Sunshine State has maintained a lower jobless figure than the national number for 51 straight months.

Miami-Dade County had the lowest unemployment rate in the state for January at 2.4%, slightly down from December’s 2.5%. But compared to a year ago, January’s unemployment rate saw a 0.5-percentage-point increase from last year.

Sumter County had the highest unemployment rate in the state in January at 6.9%.

Among major metropolitan areas in Florida, Fort Myers and Pensacola shared the dubious distinction of having 4% unemployment rates in January, the highest among large metro areas. Both were increases month-to-month and compared to January 2024.

Jacksonville and Tampa each had a 3.8% unemployment rate in January. Both were increases from a year ago, and each had an increase from the December unemployment rate.

Palm Beach County registered a 3.7% jobless figure in January. That figure was also up for the month and the year-over-year comparison.

The Orlando area also had an increase in the jobless figure, coming in at 3.6%. As was the same with other major metro areas, that figure was an increase for the month and the year.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Blaise Ingoglia proposals giving voters new term-limit powers clear first Senate hurdle

Published

on


Two proposals from Sen. Blaise Ingoglia that could cap the tenures of long-standing legislators in Tallahassee and throughout the state have cleared the Senate Ethics and Elections Committee.

First, the committee approved SJR 536, which proposes a constitutional amendment on the 2026 General Election ballot.

It would potentially block legislators who served two full terms in the Senate and four years in the House (16 years total) from returning for more time in the legislative branch.

An amendment from the temporarily absent Sen. Erin Grall that was presented by Jenn Bradley would have relaxed the cap to 24 years total. But it was deemed unfriendly by the sponsor and failed by a 3-3 vote.

Bradley is concerned by the “lifetime ban” that could result from Ingoglia’s measure, though she acknowledged the “ping pong” of legislators between one office and the other.

“If you serve and years later you want to come back and serve your community, I think that’s the most American thing you can do,” the Clay County Republican said.

Ingoglia is open to a “time certain” element to the language that could open up potential returns after a certain point for legislators, and that theoretically is something that could be seen at a future committee stop.

Monday’s committee also approved SJR 802, which seeks a separate amendment setting eight-year term limits for County Commissions and School Boards, though terms of office that started before the 2022 General Election would be off the clock under this proposal.

Bradley proposed a change to this bill as well, starting the clock with the 2026 election and extending the term limit to 12 years. That amendment, also filed by an absent Grall, failed as well.

Stakeholders from around the state slammed Ingoglia’s measure in comment ahead of debate and the vote.

Jeff Scala of the Florida Association of Counties protested the proposal’s “one-size-fits-all approach,” saying the amendment would block the popular will in individual counties.

Wakulla County Commissioner Ralph Thomas said the “distant, uniform mandate … flies in the face of principles upon which our country and state were founded” and that the bill is an “affront to the spirit of liberty.”

Debate transcended party lines.

Vice Chair Mack Bernard, a Democrat, said he supported the bill but worried it would hurt the interest of small counties and saw “work that could be done.”

Grall, who arrived too late to get her amendments onto the bills, spoke of the need for “institutional knowledge” and said she was a “no” on the bill because the “number is wrong.”

“Eight’s the wrong number,” Grall said.

Ingoglia said polling showed voters wanted eight-year term limits.

“All we’re saying is put it on the ballot,” the Spring Hill Republican said.

Both Senate measures have two committee stops ahead. The House companions for each have not been heard, but both have only been referred to two committees total.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida’s heartland needs EV infrastructure, not more barriers

Published

on


Florida is at a pivotal moment.

Our state now has over 400,000 registered electric vehicles (EVs), the second-highest in the country and consumer demand for clean transportation continues to grow, driving a critical need for charging infrastructure, especially in rural areas and evacuation zones. Unfortunately, proposed efficiency audits threaten to stall progress, discarding millions in federal grant funds while pushing rural communities further behind and exposing them to continued soaring gasoline prices.

Over the last six years, Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Republican Legislature have focused on striking a balance to make sure Florida is ready to embrace the future while ensuring fiscal conservancy. The Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) recent study cited that for every dollar invested in transportation the state generates a return of $4.40.

Recognizing that EV adoption continues to accelerate with 1 in 10 new vehicles sold in Florida in Q4 2024 being electric, FDOT created the state’s Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Deployment Plan in 2021. However, despite ranking second in the nation for registered EVs, Florida’s charging infrastructure isn’t keeping pace, with rural regions lagging the most and critical gaps in coverage still remaining.

Last year, Florida spent time and money deploying temporary mobile EV charging stations along Interstate 75 and Interstate 4 during Hurricane Milton to meet the demands of residents along evacuation corridors and in rural areas. After both Hurricane Milton and Helene, Florida’s EV stationary charging stations were up and running swiftly, while gas stations struggled for weeks with long lines and inadequate fuel supplies.

Investing in permanent EV charging infrastructure along evacuation routes and in rural areas would cut costs, improve efficiency, and increase resilience — helping Floridians before, during and after disasters.

Rural communities from Immokalee to the Panhandle continue to wait as new and unnecessary bureaucratic barriers slow funding distribution and create uncertainty. With rural drivers spending 30% more on transportation annually than urban drivers and with limited public transit options, reliable EV infrastructure will be crucial to reducing costs and meeting their community’s needs.

Creating new barriers and task forces isn’t just red tape — it prevents rural Floridians from saving over $10,500 on the lifetime of their EV purchase, savings they’ll miss without access to charging stations.

Investing now in future-ready infrastructure is not only efficient, it’s essential to keep Florida ahead of the curve. Our state’s leaders have long championed cost-effective, market-driven solutions that reduce government waste while delivering real savings to everyday Floridians.

The transition to electric vehicles presents an opportunity to uphold those values — reducing transportation costs, increasing fuel independence and making rural communities more resilient — regardless of your ZIP code. By funding mobility solutions today, we ensure Florida is prepared for tomorrow’s transportation needs, reducing long-term costs and positioning the state as a leader in sustainable innovation.

___

Ali DySard is a senior policy and program specialist with the Environmental Defense Fund.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.