Connect with us

Business

He lost his job because of Donald Trump’s USAID funding freeze. Now he’s helping other laid-off federal workers find work

Published

on



Wayan Vota knew something was wrong. 

A 20-year veteran of the international aid sector, Vota was long accustomed to industry changes following the inauguration of a new president—there is always a reset period during which agencies and contractors shift to align with the incoming administration’s priorities. But this time was different. 

Newly-inaugurated President Trump signed an executive order in mid January halting all foreign aid programs through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Vota anticipated a big shakeup at his firm, Humentum, which was predominantly funded by federal grants, and estimated that it would lead to layoffs for around 80% of the company. But Jan. 31 is when he found out he would also be included in those cuts, losing his job along with most of his colleagues.  

“I cried in my daughter’s arms,” he tells Fortune. “All of my peers, everybody who I would think of talking to, were also unemployed.” 

Vota is just one of thousands of federal workers and contractors who lost their jobs this year due to the Trump administration’s funding freezes, unprecedented resignation offers, and outright layoffs. Approximately 75,000 workers accepted the administration’s deferred resignation offer, and many more have been affected in other ways, with the promise of more pain to come. There is no official count for the total number of federal workers and contractors who have been laid off, but 62,530 government positions have been cut so far this year, according to global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray, & Christmas. Some areas have been more affected than others, and international aid has been particularly hard hit

After spending 24 hours cycling through various stages of grief following his layoff, Vota decided to take action. “I woke up and said: ‘Okay, I am not going to sit here and be a crying, blubbering mess. I’m going to get up and do something about it.’” 

On Feb. 1, he started a Substack called “Career Pivot,” with the aim of creating a community for laid off aid workers and helping them find new roles outside of the sector. He now has more than 9,000 subscribers, whose interests and specialities run the gamut from AI to health care and data analysis. Vota says that a large percentage are mid-to senior level staff who have spent the majority of their professional lives in the international development sector.

“There are people that spent a decade or 20 years within USAID, or got a master’s degree in International Development, joined the Peace Corps, then joined USAID, and just never worked anywhere else,” he says. 

‘Every single subscriber is somebody in pain’

Career Pivot is a combination of blog posts, FAQs, success stories, job listings, mental health resources, discussion boards, and networking events. 

It provides information and guidance to former federal employees and contractors searching for work, with an emphasis on highlighting expertise that could be valuable in another field, becoming marketable in the private sector, and sharing knowledge with others. “A huge part of Career Pivot is helping people translate their skills into terms the private sector understands,” Vota says. 

Articles on the site have headlines like “10 Ways to Rethink Your USAID Job Titles: How to translate your vast development experience into corporate-friendly terms,” “Resistance is NOT futile,” and “What are your health insurance options now?” 

Alex Collins, a public health social worker who specializes in maternal and child health, worked with Vota many years ago at a nonprofit. When she lost her job last month, she signed up for Career Pivot as soon as it went live. She says the site reinforced “how incredibly valuable not just our immediate networks of people are, but the networks that each of those people bring—a second tier of contacts.”

While the website was initially intended for international development workers, Vota says his subscriber base has grown to include impacted workers at other agencies, like the Department of Veterans affairs, and the Department of Education. 

Vota has a team of eight volunteers who assist him with the site, and offers both free and paid subscriptions. The latter cost $20 a month or $100 annually, and include more curated and personalized content, like “AMA” Zoom calls with recruiters where people can ask specific questions related to their job search. Vota says he’s using the money he makes to reinvest in the business. 

“My wife is very disappointed that at this point I’m a startup. All the money I’m making is going right back into services and processes and content for people,” he says. 

Finding community

Career Pivot certainly offers practical tools for job seekers, but many workers say the best thing they get out of it is a sense that they’re not alone.  

Laura Wigglesworth worked as a global health and development recruiter in the international development sector for 25 years, and lost her job as a result of the funding freeze. She was an early subscriber and has been participating in Vota’s workshops, learning things like how to optimize her resume with AI. Because of her professional experience, she’s also helping others navigate the job search process. 

“Job hunting is daunting and scary and lonely, and it can be very depressing,” she says. “Especially if you don’t have a support community of people going through what you’re going through.” 

That feeling is echoed by Joel Levesque, who lost his job as a federal contractor earlier this year when USAID funding dried up. He was working at government consulting firm Millennium Partners Consulting as an activity manager, and had four years left on his contract when he was fired on Feb. 24. Levesque launched his own Substack in February, where he provides people with guidance on how to leverage AI in the job search process. He now also works with Vota and Career Pivot via guest posts and AMAs. While he appreciates the comprehensive information site provides, he says it was not the main reason he subscribed. 

“What I found was that it was a community,” he says. “This was really quite a traumatic thing that happened for people actually working in the sector. I don’t think anyone was expecting this. So to be able to engage in a community where people are like me, and going through the same thing, really made me feel like I wasn’t crazy.” 

‘I can’t predict the future’

While many laid off federal workers are just beginning their job search, Vota is starting to see the results of his work. 

“I just had somebody email me today saying, ‘I’ve unsubscribed because I have a job.’ Oh, that was the most beautiful email ever! It made my entire day,” he says. His goal is for the average Career Pivot subscription to last three to six months, maximum. “I don’t want to have multi-year members. That would be a mark of failure, not a mark of success.” 

Many former international aid workers, including Vota, still hold out hope for the future of the sector, although they know it will look different. “USAID, as the agency we knew on January 20, will not exist in the future. Foreign assistance, which is the larger concept of helping other countries, will continue,” he says.

 How, exactly? He’s not entirely sure. it could be years before funding cuts are reversed. That may also depend on the outcome of the 2026 and 2028 elections. But Vota doesn’t have time to hold his breath. 

“I can’t predict the future, but I have the strong feeling that the majority of us have to find a new career just to stay alive.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

UBS follows Deutsche Bank by banning staff from working remotely on both Friday and Monday

Published

on

Swiss banking giant UBS has resisted following remote working hawks like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, who’ve mandated a full return to office. It has, however, taken a leaf out of another rival’s approach.

In an internal memo circulated on Thursday, first reported by Finews, UBS told staff they would be required to work from the office at least three days a week. In addition, the bank told its 115,000 employees that they would no longer be able to work from home on a Friday followed by a consecutive Monday.

“Our working approach is office-centric with flexibility, and we ask our employees to be in the office at least three days a week. Spending enough time in the office with colleagues fosters innovation, collaboration, and team productivity,” a UBS spokesperson told Fortune.

The approach is similar to that of Deutsche Bank last year, which, in calling staff back to the office, drew a new line in the sand by banning remote Fridays and Mondays. 

Many workers operating under a hybrid model opt to come into the office between Tuesday and Thursday, working their Mondays and Fridays remotely. Fridays in particular have proved popular among both bosses and employees as the remote day of choice.

The hawkish voices in the remote vs. in-office debate argue this trend has created a habit of lower productivity around the weekend as employees slow down into Saturday or ramp up more slowly to a Tuesday. Manchester United co-owner Jim Ratcliffe ordered his staff back to the office full-time in May last year when he realized email activity plunged on a Friday when most employees were remote.

One problem companies like UBS are more publicly happy to address is space. Many firms vacated office space during COVID-19 in order to cut costs when remote work looked like a permanent solution. 

UBS is no different. In London, the company has consolidated staff at its Broadgate HQ, where it sublet space during the height of remote working, after it also chose not to renew its lease at 1 Golden Lane. During that time, the company also integrated employees from the newly acquired Credit Suisse into its offices, putting a further crunch on space. A move to choose between a Monday and Friday should regulate attendance through the week.

Companies have also been left frustrated by thousands of square meters of office space going unused on the more unpopular Mondays and Fridays.

UBS’s move to balance out office working across the week is understood to be a move to better manage its office space. Deutsche Bank gave the same reasoning last year, with CEO Christian Sewing saying the motivation was to “spread our presence more evenly across the week.”

The latest policy introduced by UBS remains much more liberal than the group’s competitors in the banking sector, most notably JPMorgan. The group mandated a full RTO mandate that began in March. Already, though, staff have complained about inadequate space, poor Wi-Fi, and unwell co-workers.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Facebook ramps up TikTok battle by letting creators monetize their Stories

Published

on



  • Facebook has announced a new monetization program for creators. Facebook Content Monetization is meant to lure creators from TikTok as the company looks to build out its flagship social media property.

With the threat of a TikTok ban fading for now, Facebook is ramping up efforts to get creators to post their work on its platform.

The company has announced a new monetization program that will let creators make money simply by sharing photos and videos on the Facebook site. (Instagram has its own monetization program.)

Applications are being accepted at this website for the program’s beta. And at least one member of that beta program claims to have made $5,000 so far posting videos he would have normally posted without financial incentives.

Facebook has already sent invitations to one million creators to join the beta program, but is looking to expand it. Earnings will be based on engagement, total views, and plays. Public videos, reels, photos, and text posts are eligible to earn money.

Facebook has, for months, been trying to win the attention of creators. While Instagram has a healthy creator community, Meta’s flagship property has had trouble attracting them. In January, the company offered a $5,000 bonus to creators with an existing presence on other social platforms. TikTok remains the most popular destination for creators, but the lingering threat of that platform disappearing has made several of them diversify their outlets.

Over the course of the next year, the new Facebook Content Monetization program will replace Ads on Reels, In-Stream Ads and the Performance bonus programs. As part of the change, the company is streamlining its dashboard for creators to make it easier to see how their monetization efforts are going.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Struggling consumers skimp on chips and cigarettes as convenience store sales slip

Published

on

Consumers are forgoing bags of Doritos and packs of cigarettes as convenience stores across the U.S. face sales declines. It’s another sign of stress for Americans, who are dealing with ever-changing tariff policies, fears of stagflation, and a potential recession.

Sales volume at U.S. convenience stores dropped 4.3% in the year ending Feb. 23, according to data from Circana, a Chicago-based market-research firm, and first reported by the Wall Street Journal. Refrigerated and frozen products, tobacco, and general food sales saw some of the steepest declines.

The sales slip comes as working-class and middle-class households are pulling back spending and overall consumer sentiment is dropping due in part to President Donald Trump’s ongoing trade war and fast-changing tariff policies. Top CEOs like JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon are becoming increasingly worried about the possible inflationary and recessionary effects of the president’s evolving policies.

There are other factors at play, like higher gas prices, WSJ reported. Though the cost is coming down now, it has been elevated, meaning people have less to spend on a quick snack or drink inside a gas station’s convenience store. And some consumers are looking for healthier options.

And it’s not just convenience items. Consumers say they are planning to pull back discretionary spending in a number of areas, according to McKinsey & Co., including apparel, footwear, and electronics. In general, Americans have less in their checking and savings to absorb higher prices.

That said, Jeff Lenard, vice president of media and strategic communications at the National Association of Convenience Stores, says some of the lost consumer dollars stores are experiencing in packaged food is going toward prepared food in the stores, so not all is lost. Still, he says consumer sentiment is not strong and stores “really need to fight for customers.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.