Yvette Colbourne earned another four years in office. She’ll serve alongside two new members of the Miramar City Commission.
With all 19 precincts reporting Tuesday, Colbourne had 86% of the vote to defeat challenger Luis Pedraza and keep Seat 2 at City Hall.
Pedraza turned in substantial fundraising numbers and was an active campaigner. But he was a long shot to win after mistakenly checking the wrong box on his paperwork and making himself a write-in candidate.
For Seat 3, Avril Cherasard had 53.5% of ballots cast in herfavor, outpacing Keith “Papa Keith” Walcott and Nari Tomlinson, who took 28% and 18% of the vote, respectively.
In the Seat 4 race, Carson “Eddy” Edwards won with 41.6% of the vote, defeating Kerri-Ann Nesbeth (33%), Kertch Conze (18%), and Pamela Reid (7%).
Election rules in Miramar, Broward’s fourth-largest municipality by population, provide that the biggest vote-getter in each race wins outright. There are no runoffs.
Because municipal elections are technically nonpartisan, none of the candidates’ political affiliations were denoted on the ballot.
This cycle’s top issues for voters and candidates included neighboring Miami-Dade County’s proposal to build a trash incinerator nearby, housing affordability, and the city’s budgetary constraints, which several candidates said are exacerbated by unnecessary event spending.
Coulbourne, a 63-year-old Democrat, sought her fourth consecutive term on the five-member City Commission. She was first elected in 2013 and last won re-election in 2021 with 66% of the vote.
Incumbent Yvette Colbourne and challenger Luis Pedraza. Images via Miramar and Luis Pedraza.
She ran on a record of working to keep the city’s taxes flat, require a minimum wage for city employees, create an affordable housing trust fund, improve local infrastructure and oppose Miami-Dade County’s efforts to build a trash incinerator just outside the city.
According to her most recent campaign finance report, Colbourne raised more than $162,000 and spent about $47,000 to hold onto her seat.
Pedraza, a 54-year-old Republican, ran on a promise to prioritize public safety, affordable housing, fiscal responsibility in government, regulating nearby limestone blast mining, improving traffic and supporting school choice in education. He also opposes the trash incinerator, which he calls an “insanely awful idea.”
He raised about $80,000 and spent more than half that sum by last week.
(L-R) Avril Cherasard, Nari Tomlinson and Keith Walcott. Images via the candidates.
Cherasard, Tomlinson and Walcott ran to succeed 22-year Commissioner Winston Barnes in representing the city’s east side.
Cherasard, a 44-year-old real estate broker, was the sole no-party candidate. She raised close to $43,000 and spent $34,000 through March 6.
Her priorities included affordable housing, addressing Miramar’s budget issues and planning for the city’s future. She said the city needs to cut spending, particularly on events and government employee benefits.
Democrats Tomlinson and Walcott each carried notable endorsements.
The South Florida Sun-Sentinel recommended Tomlinson, a 36-year-old finance director for a nursing referral service, citing his residency in the city’s oft-overlooked historic neighborhood.
Meanwhile, the Florida Democratic Party was behind Walcott, a radio DJ listed among its modest “Take back Local” slate for March. Florida Future Leaders, a Generation Z-led PAC, also backed him.
Tomlinson, who has chaired the Historic Miramar Advisory Board, told the Sun-Sentinel that the city needs more police patrolling its east side and a more modest event calendar.
Walcott said the city’s spending ledger needs to be better examined.
Moneywise, Walcott led the field with over $55,000 raised through Feb. 21, the last date he filed a campaign finance report. Tomlinson carried a comparatively paltry war chest of less than $3,500.
(L-R) Kertch Conze, Carson Edwards, Kerri-Ann Nesbeth and Pamela Reid. Images via the candidates.
Conze, Edwards, Nesbeth and Reid vied to finish the term of Alexandra Davis, who won a seat on the Broward County Commission last June, through 2027.
So did Edwards, a 69-year-old marketing pro who raised $51,000. Nesbeth and Reid amassed $41,500 and $7,000, respectively. Edwards agreed with others that Miramar puts on too many events.
Nesbeth, 35, is the managing partner of an education management firm. Her priorities included improving public safety, implementing inclusive government practices, and supporting sustainable city growth and small businesses.
Reid, 60, owns and operates Dreamcatchers of the Soul, a holistic wellness organization for children. She campaigned on a promise to curb overdevelopment and audit spending at City Hall.
The Sun-Sentinel recommended Nesbeth, who also carried endorsements from Barnes, Miramar Mayor Wayne Messam, Sens. Shevrin Jones and Barbara Sharief, Rep. Robin Bartleman and Florida Future Leaders, among others.
Investor sentiment is building against the First Lady running for Governor in 2026.
On the question of whether Casey DeSantis will run for Governor, Polymarket shows a “yes” share now at 40 cents.
To put that in perspective, a “yes” was priced at 71 cents on March 9, suggesting that people willing to spend money on this proposition are moving away from what would be an unprecedented campaign.
Gov. Ron DeSantis and the First Lady have done their part to try to stoke interest in the still prospective campaign, including by strategic undercutting of President Donald Trump’s endorsement of U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds.
Casey and Ron DeSantis quoted baseball legend Yogi Berra when addressing reporters recently, stoking speculation that she would run.
“To quote the late Yogi Berra,” the First Lady said when asked if she was running, “if you see a fork in the road, take it.”
“You guys can read into that what you will,” he said. “I think she’s leaving that to the imagination and to start talking about good old Yogi Berra, because you know he had a lot of very perceptive comments.”
The long-dead and largely forgotten Berra isn’t likely to endorse in next year’s Republican Primary. But others, including the Club for Growth PAC and Donald Trump Jr., are on board with Donalds in what appears to be an early attempt to clear the field and foreclose the possibility of a DeSantis dynasty.
For decades, asphalt shingles have been the roofing material of choice for Florida homeowners, providing an affordable and reliable solution to protect homes from the harsh Sunshine State climate. Yet recently, reports have circulated that legislators may consider restrictions favoring alternative roofing materials.
This idea, driven more by market interference than sound policy, misrepresents the reality of Florida’s roofing industry and could ultimately hurt the very homeowners our laws should protect.
I’ve been a roofer and business owner my entire adult life, so I’ve spent decades on rooftops across Florida. I know firsthand what works in our state’s unique climate and what doesn’t. I also had the honor of serving in the Florida Senate and House and recognize bad ideas that would favor a select few at the expense of the general public.
Metal roofs are a great option that homeowners should have access to, but they should not be pawns in choosing winners and losers. Asphalt shingles have proven themselves to be a cost-effective, durable, and accessible roofing option for millions of homeowners. Any effort to restrict them would do more harm than good.
Asphalt shingles remain the most widely used and versatile roofing material in Florida, covering approximately 70-75% of homes. This isn’t by accident — homeowners choose asphalt shingles because they offer a combination of affordability, durability, and aesthetic appeal that other materials often can’t match.
Some critics point to the large number of insurance claims related to asphalt shingles as the reason to push for alternatives and restrict the use of asphalt. But this argument ignores a basic fact: asphalt shingles simply cover more roofs in Florida than any other roofing material. Damage doesn’t occur because of the roofing material itself – instead, it’s affected by whether the roof meets modern standards and, in some cases, by the quality of installation.
Government overreach is going to cost homeowners more money without any benefits. Rather than restricting options for Florida homeowners, we should be focused on strengthening overall roofing performance across all materials.
Over the years, Florida’s building codes have improved significantly and modern asphalt shingles have evolved to meet higher standards for wind resistance, hail impact, and fire protection. The industry continues to innovate, with manufacturers working alongside regulators to improve installation practices and durability.
There are already proposals to further enhance Florida’s building codes to improve roofing resilience — without placing unnecessary financial burdens on homeowners and would-be homebuyers.
If Florida were to impose new restrictions or disincentives on asphalt shingles, the biggest losers would be working families and middle-class homeowners who can’t afford more expensive roofing materials like metal or tile. Roofing policies shouldn’t be dictated by the commercial interests of those selling competing products but should instead prioritize consumer choice and economic fairness.
As someone who has built a career in the roofing industry, I know that no two homes — and no two budgets – are alike. Homeowners should have the freedom to choose the roofing materials that best fit their needs.
As a roofer, a business owner and former legislator, I urge policymakers, industry leaders, and regulators to take a measured, fact-based approach to roofing discussions. Let’s focus on ensuring strong building standards, promoting consumer education, and allowing homeowners the freedom to choose the roofing materials that best fit their needs and budgets.
___
Keith Perry is a former member of the state Senate representing Alachua, Putnam, and part of Marion counties in North Central Florida.
The latest U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) forecast for Florida’s citrus harvest this season is a bit more optimistic than the past few months, but not by much.
The March citrus crop forecast for the Sunshine State projects there will be 11.6 million boxes of oranges harvested from Florida groves in the 2024-25 season, along with 1.2 million boxes of grapefruit. Both of those figures are up by only 100,000 boxes in each category compared to February’s forecast.
It may not seem like much. But the forecast at least puts a stop to plummeting projections for the growing season. Forecasts have fallen each month since Hurricanes Helene and Milton ravaged Florida in September and October, respectively. Citrus officials worried that growers would not recover much of the fruit that was lost due to those storms.
While the latest forecast shows an uptick in the forecast compared to February, it’s still not as high as January’s prognostication. In the first month of the year, the USDA projected that there would be 12 million boxes of oranges harvested by the end of the growing season and 1.2 million boxes of grapefruit would be produced.
This month’s forecast for the harvest of tangelos and tangerines remains the same, at 350,000 boxes.
Nevertheless, Florida citrus officials are encouraged that there was at least some increase in the forecasted harvest this month from the USDA.
“Today’s steady increase in the citrus crop estimate offers a glimmer of hope that production may be on the road to recovery. Despite setbacks from hurricanes and citrus greening, citrus growers and researchers are working hand-in-hand to leverage technologies and sustainable practices to rebuild Florida citrus production,” said Matt Joyner, CEO at Florida Citrus Mutual.
“It’s crucial that industry, academia and government continue working together to ensure the future is bright for Florida citrus. Florida’s citrus industry continues to receive an outpouring of support from state leaders, including Senate President Ben Albritton and Florida Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson. With continued resources from the state and federal levels, Florida citrus growers can preserve Florida’s citrus legacy as the iconic symbol of our state, providing jobs and shaping our culture for more than a century.”
As the Legislative Session is ongoing, lawmakers in Tallahassee will consider citrus proposals fronted by Gov. Ron DeSantis. He proposed the Focus on Fiscal Responsibility Budget for 2025-26, which calls for more than $20 million for the Citrus Health Response Program and other citrus research. About $7 million of that money, if approved, would go to advertising and additional research through the Florida Department of Citrus to increase the production of trees and advance technologies that produce trees resistant to citrus greening.