Connect with us

Politics

Karen Love ousts longtime Gulfport Mayor Sam Henderson

Published

on


Incumbent City Council member Christine Brown was also defeated.

Political newcomer Karen Love has defeated Gulfport’s longtime Mayor Sam Henderson, according to unofficial results from the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections office following Tuesday’s municipal races. 

Henderson has served as the small town’s Mayor since 2013. His term will now end, with Love earning more than 55% of the vote to Henderson’s 39%. A third candidate, John Liccione, collected fewer than 6% of votes cast. 

While this is Love’s first foray into elected politics, she’s no stranger to Gulfport’s civic process, speaking frequently at City Council meetings. 

Love ran on a platform based on transparency, open communication and problem solving, and emphasized the need for robust restoration efforts following back-to-back hurricanes in the Fall that brought significant devastation to the city, particularly its downtown waterfront. 

The mayoral race was a low-budget one, with love raising just over $7,300 compared to Henderson’s $3,800. Liccione raised just over $6,000, according to the Gulfport Gabber. 

Love also ran as a change candidate, with some residents feeling frustrated with vitriol that had recently crept into city business, including a back and forth between Henderson and City Council member April Thanos last April. 

Also running on a change platform was Marlene Shaw, who also cruised to victory Tuesday night with nearly 60% of the vote. She defeated incumbent Christine Brown, who collected less than 29% of the vote, and Byron Chalfont, who received less than 12% of the vote. 

_________

Photo credit: Gulfport Gabber Facebook.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

House panel unanimously votes for death penalty for attempted political assassination

Published

on


A bill that could impose capital punishment for attempted assassinations on heads of state is finally moving, with the Criminal Justice Committee unanimously voting to advance it.

Rep. Jeff Holcomb’s legislation (HB 653) contemplates adding to Florida law that the death sentence applies when a “capital felony was committed against the head of a state, including, but not limited to, the President or the Vice President of the United States or the Governor of this or another state, or in an attempt to commit such crime a capital felony was committed against another individual.”

Holcomb, a Republican from Spring Hill, said his bill extended to heads of state the protections currently afforded to cops.

“Members, just think back to about a year ago, July 13, 2024, when President Trump had an attempted assassination. If that perpetrator had not been taken out by law enforcement, he would have gone on trial. If he had done that in Florida after this bill, he’d be eligible for the death penalty,” Holcomb said, alluding to the rally shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Trump, however, was not in office at the time, so he technically wouldn’t have been a head of state.

Democrats peppered Holcomb with questions, including about federal penalties for assassination attempts and why in that context a state would replicate them.

Holcomb said current laws “don’t necessarily treat assassination or attempted assassinations for a head of state with the heightened severity that it deserves.”

He also said the bill would provide “deterrence.”

“If you’re going to look to assassinate a head of state, you choose someplace else and not Florida,” he said.

Vice Chair Webster Barnaby extolled the “very, very important bill,” saying it would “ensure that when people come to Florida, they’ll know how to conduct themselves.”

This bill has one stop to go before the House floor.

Meanwhile, the Senate version (SB 776) of this proposal is being carried by another Spring Hill Republican, Sen. Blaise Ingoglia. It has yet to be heard in committee.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rollback of Parkland-inspired age limits on gun purchases clears House committee

Published

on


Legislation that could roll back age restrictions on gun purchases put in place after the Parkland shooting cleared its first House committee.

The House Criminal Justice Subcommittee advanced a bill (HB 759) that would reduce the age limit to buy firearms from 21 to 18. That follows a call from Gov. Ron DeSantis to roll back restrictions signed by his predecessor, former Gov. Rick Scott, in the wake of a shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

“At 18 to 20 years old, you can be tried for crimes and sentenced to death. You can sign contracts, can sue and be sued,” said Rep. Michelle Salzman, a Pensacola Republican.

“You can get married and you can own property. House Bill 759 rectifies an inconsistency in our legal framework by ensuring that all adult citizens in Florida are afforded their full second amendment rights by lowering the minimum age for firearm purchases to 18. We acknowledge the responsibilities and rights that come with adulthood.”

The bill passed on a 13-5 vote. It now heads to the House Judiciary Committee.

In the 2018 Parkland attack, a 19-year-old shooter killed 17 people, including 14 teenage students, and injured 18 others. He used an AR-15 rifle he purchased from a gun shop shortly before the crime.

Gun control advocacy groups vocally opposed the potential change in gun-buying age, which many lobbied for in the aftermath of the shooting.

“After that tragedy, Florida did the right thing by raising the minimum age to buy a long gun to 21. That law has saved lives,” said Fiona Shannon, who leads the League of Women Voters’ gun safety committee.

“Now there was a push to undo that progress, to lower the age back to 18. Why? What has changed? Have we forgotten the pain of Parkland? Have we forgotten the parents who still wake up every day missing their children, the teachers who sacrifice their lives to shield their students?”

But gun rights advocates say it’s unconstitutional to restrict the right to purchase firearms for adults. Luis Valdes, Florida State Director for Gun Owners of America, said similar legislation has already run into legal trouble in other states, including Tennessee and Minnesota.

“On top of that, the Parkland situation was an abject failure of government, not gun control,” Valdes said. “Gun control doesn’t solve anything. The shooter had over 30 points of contact with the Broward County Sheriff’s Office, and at no point did they take the proper action with him.”

Democrats on the committee criticized House Republicans taking up a rollback of restrictions for the third year in a row. Rep. Dianne Hart, a Tampa Democrat, said gun violence remains a problem in too many Florida schools.

“18-year-olds don’t need guns,” she said. “We don’t let them drink alcohol for a reason: because they’re not ready.”

This marks the first Legislative Session since the Parkland law passed that all House members who voted on that law when it passed have now been termed limited out of office.

Rep. Shane Abbott, a DeFuniak Springs Republican, said if the nation enlists 18-year-olds to fight in the military, citizens that age should be allowed to purchase firearms of their own as well.

Rep. Taylor Yarkosky, a Montverde Republican, said many 18-year-olds are already better trained with firearms than many older residents. He said his own daughter started taking gun safety classes at age 10.

“She’s extremely proficient, and she’s going to college next year at FAU down in Boca, and she’s like, ‘Dad, you’re telling me, I can’t have my rifle? I can’t bring this?’” Yarkosky said. “And I said, ‘No, you can’t under the current law.’ And she is more well trained at this than a lot of people.”

A companion bill (SB 920) has been filed in the Senate by Sen. Jay Collins, a Tampa Republican, but it has not been placed on a committee agenda to date. It was directed to the Senate Criminal Justice Committee.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ana Maria Rodriguez’s property rights bill again advances unanimously, heads to floor next

Published

on


Rodriguez’s bill creates non-judicial procedures for property owners to request that unauthorized persons be removed from commercial property.

The Senate Committee on Rules advanced a property rights bill that seeks to give commercial property owners more teeth to evict individuals found to be squatting.

It now heads to the Senate floor.

Doral Republican Sen. Ana Maria Rodriguez introduced the measure (SB 322) that would authorize a County Sheriff to promptly remove any unauthorized persons at the request of the owner. The bill is similar to an already adopted law that allows a Sheriff to remove unauthorized persons from a residential property.

“This bill creates a non-judicial procedure for a property owner to request that the County Sheriff immediately remove an unauthorized person from commercial real property,” Rodriguez explained. “This procedure is like procedures in existing law, for the removal of an unauthorized person from a residential property. An unauthorized person is someone not authorized to occupy the property who is not a current or former tenant.”

In the bill’s analysis, it states that an owner would be required to contact the Sheriff and file a complaint form. Ownership would be required to be verified before law enforcement can remove the unauthorized person. The owner would further be required to pay a civil eviction fee to the Sheriff, plus an hourly rate if a Deputy is required to stand by and “keep the peace” while the person is removed.

Wrongfully removed persons could have cause to take action against the owner for three times the fair market rent, damages, costs and attorneys fees. The legislation would also expand crimes relating to unauthorized occupation of a residential property or falsely advertising a residential or commercial property for sale or lease.

In 2024, Gov. Ron DeSantis enacted legislation (HB 621) that allowed police to remove squatters from a property. The new legislation amends the 2024 law, adding an express grant of authority to law enforcement to use reasonable force to enter a property.

The bill was passed unanimously without debate. The Judiciary and Criminal Justice committees also approved the measure unanimously.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.