Connect with us

Politics

Mike Waltz sees no NATO path for Ukraine

Published

on


He says Europe needs to step up.

National Security Adviser Mike Waltz is a no on adding Ukraine to NATO.

He says Ukraine’s defense is something European allies can help to fund, but requiring American mutual defense for Kyiv is a nonstarter.

“We are absolutely committed to NATO writ large, our Article 5 treaty agreements with other NATO countries, but the security guarantees for Ukraine is a different conversation,” the Donald Trump appointee said on “Fox & Friends.”

“One of the things that we fully support is both France and the United Kingdom and other Europeans saying they would be willing to enter into very strong security guarantees for the future of Ukraine. That’s a different conversation.”

Waltz’s position aligns with that of the Trump administration overall, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who recently said he does not believe that “NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement” and that “there will not be U.S. troops deployed to Ukraine.”

Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy has offered to resign in exchange for NATO membership, but that assurance likely won’t be tested anytime soon.

Though Waltz opposes Ukraine in NATO, he still advocates for an arrangement where the U.S. offers security guarantees in exchange for rights to the country’s rare earth minerals.

“Our position has been (that) 50% of something that is much larger growing the pie is better than the 100% of where they are today,” Waltz said.

“So let’s grow together in an economic partnership, and of course, the U.S. would protect our assets for which we are invested in. This could mean trillions, not only for the Ukrainian people, but for us, and stability for the region, and that economic investment is one of the best security guarantees that Ukraine could hope for.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Apple announces $500 billion investment in U.S. amid tariff threats that could affect the iPhone

Published

on


Apple announced Monday that it plans to invest more than $500 billion in the United States over the next four years, including plans to hire 20,000 people and build a new server factory in Texas.

The move comes just days after President Donald Trump said Apple CEO Tim Cook promised him that the tech giant’s manufacturing would shift from Mexico to the U.S. Trump noted the company was doing so to avoid paying tariffs. That pledge, coupled with Monday’s investment commitment, came as Trump continues to threaten to impose tariffs that could drive up the cost of iPhones made in China.

“We are bullish on the future of American innovation, and we’re proud to build on our long-standing U.S. investments with this $500 billion commitment to our country’s future,” Cook said in a company blog post.

Apple outlined several concrete moves in its announcement, the most significant of which is the construction of a new factory in Houston — slated to open in 2026 — that will produce servers to power Apple Intelligence, its suite of AI features. The company claims this factory will create “thousands of jobs.”

The announcement is similar to one Apple made in early 2018 — during the first Trump administration — that promised to create 20,000 new jobs as part of a $350 billion spend in the U.S. Trump was also mulling a tariff then that could have affected iPhones at the time, but he didn’t end up targeting those devices during his first administration.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

On Ukraine invasion anniversary, Brian Mast blasts Russians as aggressors, calls them ‘the enemy’

Published

on


House Foreign Relations Chair Brian Mast slammed Russian President Vladimir Putin while marking the anniversary of the invasion of Ukraine.

“Today’s three-year anniversary marking the start of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is no cause for Russian celebration,” Mast said in a statement released through his committee. “It marks the anniversary of the largest tactical and strategic blunder in Russian history.”

The comments from the Stuart Republican stand in contrast to comments from President Donald Trump, who recently placed the onus on Ukraine for the ongoing conflict. “You should have never started it,” Trump posted on social media in comments directed at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Mast, however, clearly called out the Russians as invaders in his Monday statement.

“While Russia has brought brutality against civilians and soldiers alike, raping women and kidnapping children, Ukraine is slaughtering hundreds of thousands of Russian conscripts who have invaded their country,” Mast said. “Ukraine is likewise annihilating the soldiers Vladimir Putin imported from Kim Jong Un’s North Korea and overcoming the financial and military support flowing from China and Iran.”

But Mast, a vocal supporter of Trump, suggested he still trusts Trump to bring peace, and suggested the U.S. won’t appease Russia in the process.

“President Trump has recognized the need to end this carnage,” Mast said. “He will never be Neville Chamberlain, he will not seek a premature peace that allows the enemy to regroup, and he will settle for nothing less than sustained peace backed by a Europe which is capable of defending itself from Russia.”

Chamberlain, the Prime Minister of Great Britain from 1937 to 1940, signed the Munich Agreement in 1938 allowing Nazi Germany to annex Czechoslovakia, which he predicted would guarantee “peace for our time” but which history has recalled as a failed attempt to appease German Fuhrer Adolf Hitler before the start of World War II.

Trump since his election has taken a starkly different position on Ukraine than predecessor President Joe Biden, and has said he will broker a peace between Russia and Ukraine.

Mast said responsibility also falls on other European nations.

“Europe must meet the moment and match Russian military spending and recruitment,” Mast said. “Europe must realize that for our alliance to be the strongest in history, America needs a Europe that can hold its own.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Blaise Ingoglia files bill to raise homestead exemptions, says current cap ‘doesn’t cut it anymore’

Published

on


As he promised earlier this month, Spring Hills Republican Sen. Blaise Ingoglia has filed legislation to increase Florida’s homestead exemption limit.

Residents today can qualify for an up to $50,000 reduction in the assessed value of their homes to lower their property taxes. Measures Ingoglia filed (SJR 1016, SB 1018) would raise the limit to $75,000, provided voters approve the change.

If effectuated, he said, the change would mark the largest tax cut — $2.6 billion in ad valorem tax revenue that local governments would otherwise collect — in Florida history.

“Property taxes are skyrocketing and Floridians are demanding relief,” Ingoglia said in a statement.

“The current homestead exemption doesn’t cut it anymore. That’s why I’m filing for a new $75,000 homestead exemption that will be adjusted for inflation every year.  When your home value goes up, so does your exemption.”

Ingoglia’s bills, which do not yet have House companions, come less than three weeks after Gov. Ron DeSantis called for higher homestead exemption levels. The Governor said that while some local governments “do a pretty good job” of using the money for local services and upkeep, others waste it.

Residents in some areas in the state have enjoyed lower property tax rates. But others, particularly those in metropolitan markets like Jacksonville, Miami and Tampa, have seen their post-pandemic property tax bills go through the proverbial roof.

“I’d rather protect you and limit their ability to tax your (property),” Desantis said. “Voters (should) have an opportunity to rein in the cost associated with property taxes and get further protections for Florida taxpayers. I think that would be really good, and I think that would be a great thing to leave to future generations.”

DeSantis suggested as much as tripling the exemption. Ingoglia’s proposal would increase it by 50%, not counting other benefits available to veterans, active-duty military service members, disabled first responders, seniors and property owners with disabilities.

The Governor added that he would even be open to wiping out property taxes altogether, something Ocala Republican Rep. Ryan Chamberlin proposed last year.

Chamberlin’s argument for the change was that residents see their property taxes increase despite not realizing any gain in their bank accounts.

“If the IRS started charging us a tax not just on your income but what they thought we could have earned, we would have riots in the streets,” he said during early talks of the bill, which died after no Senator filed a companion bill.

Detractors of that proposal on both sides of the aisle noted that lost property tax revenue would necessarily be shifted to sales taxes, which could financially overburden less financially stable Floridians.

According to an analysis of U.S. Census data by the Urban Institute, a Washington-based think tank, property taxes are Florida’s second-largest source of per capita revenue after federal transfers.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.