Connect with us

Business

Google Meet exec on the knowledge engine hiding in your calendar: meetings become IP

Published

on



Meetings are the dark energy of business: common, powerful, and largely invisible. The reasoning and judgments that shape a company’s direction happen in meetings, but then disappear. Email turned situational communication into organizational working memory; AI is now doing the same for meetings, making conversations usable beyond the meeting itself. It turns meetings from moments in time to a new kind of organizational asset.

Beyond the Transcript

Meetings contain information that rarely makes it into a formal system: how a leader weighs trade-offs, why a decision went one way instead of another, who deferred to whom, and how objections were resolved. Companies treat strategy documents as critical intellectual property, but the central decision-making process is just as valuable, and harder to capture. Leaders often try to approximate this in writing, but it rarely captures how decisions actually unfold.

The IP of leadership happens in the meeting room. And then it’s gone. 

There is also the simple loss we already feel: decisions made but not recorded. Commitments that fade. Debates rehashed because people forget, not just what was decided, but how. Manual meeting notes are subjective and record only a small portion of this. Even complete transcripts aren’t very useful in capturing meeting meaning; the important information is rarely synthesized, analyzed, or distributed. 

Many people today use AI to summarize meeting recordings and generate (and sometimes share) useful meeting data: who’s on the hook for what, where the disagreements were, who had convincing arguments, and what the agenda should include in the next meeting. This, however, is just the beginning of AI’s application to meetings. All this information can benefit a business on a much larger scale.

Business Value

The information in unrecorded meetings begins melting once the meeting ends.  AI extraction, though, solidifies it into foundational data. Decisions, rationales, and patterns become durable. Their knowledge value stacks like bricks, not ice cubes. For the first time, what gets said in meetings becomes knowledge that an organization can actually build on – just as email made everyday communication archival and durable. 

We can combine this data with the rest of what an organization knows: its documents, CRM, email, and contracts. This joining is where new value surfaces. When meeting intelligence flows into the same corpus as everything else, its signals become amplified.

Some organizations are doing this today. At a large payments and financial services company, leaders aggregate team and customer meeting recordings to analyze patterns across conversations, to surface emerging needs and product ideas that would be difficult or impossible to spot meeting by meeting. Instead of relying on anecdotal recollection, leadership looks across interactions to understand shifting customer signals to inform product development. 

A recurring executive decision-making meeting can become a living archive not just of what decisions are made, but also of how they are made: what kind of arguments and data factor in. It can lead to smoother and more aligned decisions across the company.  As organizations begin systematically capturing meeting intelligence, team dynamics will shift. At first, decision re-litigation decreases, because the capability preserves reasoning. Onboarding accelerates, because new hires can see how the team actually thinks, not just the written policies. 

Individuals adopt AI meeting transcribers because they make their meetings better. But the business value is much larger than better meetings; it is organizational knowledge that we can build on.

What Leaders Should Do Now

Every durable knowledge system eventually reshapes how decisions are made and how work gets done. Consider how email changed the shape of work. AI meeting intelligence will follow the same path, and leaders can accelerate the transition. 

Left to individual adoption, meeting intelligence can stay fragmented. The value, while significant, remains confined to productivity, short of business transformation. The strategic payoff doesn’t materialize. 

To unlock the business value of meeting intelligence, leaders need to treat meeting capture as infrastructure, not as a tool some employees happen to use. When capture, recap, and sharing normalize across the organization, early benefits follow: more transparent accountability, less rework, and better decision follow-through. 

The transformation starts by providing AI meeting tools, explaining their direct benefits to employees, and encouraging their use. At first, the benefits of widespread AI use for capture, recap, and sharing should lead to a growing accountability culture and other employee benefits, such as reduced rework and easier follow-through.

Treating meeting capture as infrastructure means more than using it to improve meeting productivity for individuals and teams. When meeting intelligence is captured consistently, organizations can apply AI analysis to that data to discern business cause-and-effect across decisions, debates, and trade-offs.

This kind of synthesis needs a shared, reliable base of meeting data to draw on. The companies that start capturing meeting data now will be positioned to use advanced analysis as tools mature; those that leave meeting AI tools to individuals and teams won’t have the shared context to build on.

Second, we need to decide how meeting information should be shared and used. We have navigated similar questions with email and documents: as soon as a new form of knowledge becomes durable, norms and governance follow. The same will happen here. 

Meeting data will only become an enterprise asset if people understand how it is being used and can see benefits for themselves. We must be thoughtful about what’s being captured, how it’s retained, and how we manage access. When these choices are clear, meeting intelligence is more likely to strengthen collaboration and analysis, rather than create friction. 

Finally, leaders need to be deliberate about building processes that visibly leverage this new asset. The opportunity is not just capturing conversations, it’s building new rhythms that convert into reusable guidance, behaviors, and institutional memory.

From Ephemeral to Enduring

Managing cumulative meeting intelligence is new territory. There’s no established playbook for how to synthesize it or build on it over time. The organizations that figure this out first will compound their advantage, just as the companies that quickly transitioned to email did. Those that don’t will keep losing the same knowledge they’ve always lost – just with better transcripts. 

This transition won’t happen on its own. It requires leaders who recognize that meetings have crossed from ephemeral to durable, and who are ready to build the systems and culture to capture that value.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

‘No way, no how’: Dimon says he’d never run the Fed but ‘would take the call’ to lead Treasury

Published

on



As questions swirl over who will replace Fed Chair Jerome Powell when his term ends in May, Jamie Dimon is taking his name off the list of potential candidates. 

“Chairman of the Fed, I’d put in the absolutely, positively no chance, no way, no how, for any reason,” the JPMorgan CEO said when asked at a Chamber of Commerce meeting on Thursday if he’d ever consider the role. “I would so much more prefer this job than that job. That’s a hard job, but I don’t want to do that job,” he later added. 

“Hard job” may be an understatement given unprecedented pressures on the Fed since President Donald Trump returned to the White House. Last Friday, the Justice Department launched a criminal investigation into the Federal Reserve and Powell’s testimony on the renovation of Fed office buildings. The probe follows a year of increased pressure on the central bank from the Trump administration to lower interest rates. 

In August, the president attempted to unseat Fed governor Lisa Cook over alleged mortgage fraud, the first time a president has fired a sitting governor in the central bank’s 112-year history. A federal court ruled that Cook could keep her seat while she fights the firing, but Cook’s future remains uncertain as the Supreme Court hears the Trump administration’s appeal later this month. 

In addition, the Fed faces the tricky task of trying to prop up the labor market by lowering interest rates without reigniting inflation.

Dimon said he would consider being Treasury secretary if asked, but he’s hesitant to take a job working under someone else. 

“I would take the call, consider it, and think about why and what they want. But what they want and how they want to operate would be important to me,” Dimon said. “But I’ve been my own boss for pretty much 25 years, and I like it that way.” 

This is not the first time Dimon’s name has been mentioned as a potential cabinet secretary. In 2024, then President-elect Trump announced that Dimon would not be in his administration after speculation that he would be nominated for Treasury secretary. Dimon agreed that he wouldn’t be the best fit, saying “I’m not about ready to start” having a boss again. 

Earlier this week, it seemed that Dimon and Trump were at odds after Dimon warned chipping away at the central bank’s independence “is not a good idea.”    

Trump later called Dimon out, saying “Jamie Dimon probably wants higher rates. Maybe he makes more money that way.” 

On Thursday, Dimon reiterated his opposition to interfering with the Fed’s independence because “it will drive rates higher not lower,” but said he and Trump were on the same page. 

“Everyone I know, including the president of the United States, says we need an independent Fed board,” Dimon said. “Most people I know, including the president of the United States, speak up about their opinion, which they’re free to do.”

Dimon and other CEOs such as Bank of America’s Brian Moynihan and Citigroup’s Jane Fraser did just that this week after Trump called for a one-year 10% cap on credit card interest rates. Dimon said that would limit access to credit and adversely affect people who lower credit credits. 

“If it happened the way it was described, it would be dramatic,” Dimon said, speaking to analysts during the earnings call on Tuesday. “It would be dramatic on subprime.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Vail Resorts reports record‑low snowpack, forcing the company to lower its 2026 earnings outlook

Published

on



Good luck trying to wash your hands, your face, your hair with snow; there’s not nearly enough of it to do all that. Vail Resorts is lowering its expected 2026 earnings after some of the lowest snowpack in recorded history has cratered visits at its North American locations by nearly 20% since the start of the season through January 4.

Skiers staying home is taking its toll: Vail’s ski school revenue has dropped 14.9% since the start of the season compared to last year, and dining revenue fell nearly 16%, the company said in an investor statement released yesterday.

Just how dry is it? A rare polar vortex and La Niña combination dumped record amounts of snow on the East Coast this year…while starving everywhere else. The company said snowfall during November and December at its Rocky Mountain locations was down almost 60% compared to the area’s historical 30-year average. Western US resorts were faring only slightly better, with 50% less snowfall than average.

  • On Tuesday, Vail Mountain reported its worst snowpack since it started keeping records in 1978, with just 4.4 inches.
  • Only about 11% of Vail Resort’s terrain in the Rocky Mountains was open last month.

Zoom out: The wipeout comes amid the return of CEO Rob Katz, who revolutionized the ski business by consolidating resort ownership and introducing the Epic Pass, after years of the company faltering financially without him in the C-suite.—MM

This report was originally published by Morning Brew.

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Jensen Huang tells Stanford students their high expectations may make it hard for them to succeed

Published

on



We are often told that setting the bar high is key to success. After all, if you shoot for the moon and miss, at least you’ll land with the stars. But Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang wants privileged Gen Z grads to lower their expectations. 

“People with very high expectations have very low resilience—and unfortunately, resilience matters in success,” Huang said during an interview with the Stanford Graduate School of Business. “One of my great advantages is that I have very low expectations.”

Indeed, as the billionaire boss pointed out, those at elite institutions like Stanford probably have higher expectations for their future than your average Joe. 

The university is one of the most selective in the United States—it ranks third best in the country, according to the QS World University Rankings, and the few students who get picked to study there are charged more than $68,000 in tuition fees for the premium, compared to the average $38,270 per annum cost.

But, unfortunately for those saddled with student debt, not even the best universities in the world can teach you resilience.

“I don’t know how to teach it to you except for I hope suffering happens to you,” Huang added.

Huang overcame adversity to succeed

Huang’s advice for America’s next-gen elite comes from a place of experience: His life now is a world away from his childhood, which was, by his own admission, steeped in adversity. 

The tech genius—who with a net worth of $155 billion is one of the world’s wealthiest people—was born in Taiwan in 1963 and spent the bulk of his early life in Thailand, before moving to the U.S. at 9 years old.

His serendipitous Stateside move came after his dad, who worked for an air conditioner manufacturer, did some training in the country and set his sights on the American Dream. 

“I was fortunate that I grew up with my parents providing a condition for us to be successful on the one hand,” he said. “But there were plenty of opportunities for setbacks and suffering.”

One example of Huang’s hardship was his daily high school experience: The teenager had to cross a dangerous footbridge with missing planks over a river to get to his public school in Kentucky, where he was then relentlessly tormented. 

“The way you described Chinese people back then was ‘Ch-nks,’ ” Huang previously told the New Yorker, adding that bullies even tried to toss him off the bridge.

In the Stanford interview, he also credited his success and work ethic with his first job at Denny’s, where he was the “best dishwasher” before getting promoted to busboy and giving that his “best” also.

“I never left the station empty-handed. I never came back empty-handed. I was very efficient,” Huang added. “Anyways, eventually I became a CEO. I’m still working on being a good CEO.”

Coincidentally, it was at Denny’s where he cooked up the idea for a company that specialized in computer chips to render graphics, over a Super Bird sandwich with his friends Chris Malachowsky and Curtis Priem. The trio went on to cofound Nvidia, and the rest is history. 

‘I wish upon you ample doses of pain and suffering’

For those fortunate enough to never have personally experienced hardship growing up, Huang doesn’t have any advice on how to welcome more of it into your life now. But he did have some advice on embracing tough times. 

“I don’t know how to do it [but] for all of you Stanford students, I wish upon you ample doses of pain and suffering,” Huang said. “Greatness comes from character and character isn’t formed out of smart people—it’s formed out of people who suffered.” 

It’s why despite Nvidia’s success—the company has a $2 trillion market cap—Huang would still welcome hardship at his organization. 

“To this day I use the phrase ‘pain and suffering’ inside our company with great glee,” he added. “I mean that in a happy way because you want to refine the character of your company.”

Essentially, if you want your workforce to always be on their A game, don’t let them rest on their laurels.

A version of this story was published on Fortune.com on March 13, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.