Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said after a meeting in Washington on Wednesday with his Greenlandic counterpart, U.S. President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio that a “fundamental disagreement” remained. He acknowledged that “we didn’t manage to change the American position” but said he hadn’t expected to.

However, Wednesday’s events did point to ways ahead.

Searching for a compromise

Denmark, Greenland and the U.S. agreed to form a high-level working group “to explore if we can find a common way forward,” Løkke Rasmussen said. He added that he expects the group to hold its first meeting “within a matter of weeks.”

Danish and Greenlandic officials didn’t specify who would be part of the group or give other details. Løkke Rasmussen said the group should focus on how to address U.S. security concerns while respecting Denmark’s “red lines.” The two countries are NATO allies.

“Whether that is doable, I don’t know,” he added, holding out hope that the exercise could “take down the temperature.”

He wouldn’t elaborate on what a compromise might look like, and expectations are low. As Danish Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen put it Thursday, having the group is better than having no working group and “it’s a step in the right direction.” It will at least allow the two sides to talk with each other rather than about each other.

Trump has argued repeatedly that the U.S. needs control of Greenland for its national security. He has sought to justify his calls for a U.S. takeover by repeatedly claiming that China and Russia have their own designs on Greenland, which holds vast untapped reserves of critical minerals.

Sending a military signal

Just as the talks were taking place in Washington on Wednesday, the Danish Defense Ministry announced that it was increasing its military presence in Greenland, along with NATO allies. France, Germany, Norway and Sweden announced that they were each sending very small numbers of troops in a symbolic but pointed move signaling solidarity with Copenhagen.

The U.K. said one British officer was part of what it called a reconnaissance group for an Arctic endurance exercise. The German Defense Ministry, which dispatched 13 troops, said the aim is to sound out “possibilities to ensure security with a view to Russian and Chinese threats in the Arctic.” It said it was sending them on a joint flight from Denmark as “a strong signal of our unity.”

Poulsen said that “the Danish Armed Forces, together with a number of Arctic and European allies, will explore in the coming weeks how an increased presence and exercise activity in the Arctic can be implemented in practice,” he said.

On Thursday, he said the intention was “to establish a more permanent military presence with a larger Danish contribution,” and to invite allies to take part in exercises and training on a rotating basis, according to Danish broadcaster DR.

While the European troops are largely symbolic at this point, the timing was no accident.

The deployment “serves both to send a political signal and military signal to America, but also indeed to recognize that Arctic security should be reinforced more,” said Maria Martisiute, an analyst at the European Policy Center in Brussels. “And first and foremost, this should be done through allied effort, not by the U.S. coming and wanting to take it over. So it complicates the situation for the U.S.”

Talking to NATO

The European efforts are Danish-led and not coordinated through NATO, which is dominated by the United States. But the European allies are keen to keep NATO in play, and Germany said that “the aim is to obtain a well-founded picture on the ground for further talks and planning within NATO.”

Poulsen has said he and Greenland’s foreign minister plan to meet NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in Brussels on Monday to discuss security in and around the Arctic. NATO has been studying ways to bolster security in the Arctic region.

“I’m really looking forward for an announcement of some kind of military activity or deployment under NATO’s framework,” Martisiute said. “Otherwise there is indeed a risk that … NATO is paralyzed and that would not be good.”

___

Sylvain Plazy in Brussels contributed to this report.

But against a starkly different geopolitical background and tough odds — including backlash from powerful protectionist lobbies — the EU and the South American alliance known as Mercosur are expected to formally sign their quarter-century-in-the-making trade pact this Saturday at a ceremony in Paraguay.

This is the first major trade agreement for Mercosur, which includes the region’s two biggest economies, Brazil and Argentina, along with Paraguay and Uruguay. Bolivia, the newest member, was not involved in negotiations but can join the agreement in the coming years.

The trans-Atlantic trade deal — lifting tariffs on products ranging from Argentine steaks and Brazilian copper to German cars and Italian wine — still has to be ratified by the European Parliament.

The significance of creating one of the world’s largest free-trade zones — home to more than 700 million people and accounting for a quarter of global gross domestic product — while President Donald Trump yanks the United States out of the international economy is not lost on the signatories.

For once, it’s not about Trump vs. China

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hailed the deal last week as a powerful endorsement of multilateralism “in the face of an increasingly hostile and transactional world.” Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, 80, called it a rare “victory for dialogue, negotiation and the bet on cooperation.”

That victory comes at the expense of the U.S. and China, experts say, as Trump aggressively asserts American authority in the resource-rich region and Beijing uses its massive trade and loans to build influence.

“It’s a signal that South American economies are seeking to hedge away from this great power competition between the U.S. and China,” said Lee Schlenker, a research associate with the Global South program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a Washington think tank.

“It shows that South America can continue to flex its muscles in the international sphere, to diversify its trade partners and exert a certain level of autonomy it’s often denied.”

South American ranchers rejoice

The accord grants South American nations, renowned for their fertile land and skilled farmers, increased access at a preferential tax rate to Europe’s vast market for agricultural goods.

Here in Argentina, exporters reckon they’ll save tens of millions of dollars a year thanks to the deal’s immediate elimination of a 20% tariff on the EU’s long-standing quota scheme for high-quality meat imports.

It’s a breakthrough for Argentina, a nation dominated for decades by left-leaning populist governments that kept the economy closed to the outside world and prioritized the domestic market to the extent of imposing taxes on farm exports to keep food prices down.

“We’re in the midst of a paradigm shift here,” said Carlos Colombo, the president of Cañuelas Cattle Market in Buenos Aires province where over 12,000 cattle are sold daily, many destined for Europe and China. “Argentina has reopened itself to the world.”

Argentine President Javier Milei may be Trump’s strongest ideological ally in Latin America — sharing his disdain for the United Nations and the Paris climate accord — but no one can call the radical libertarian a protectionist.

At first he derided the notoriously slow-moving Mercosur as irrelevant and threatened to ditch it. But he changed his tune since realizing the bloc’s potential to sweep away tariffs and slash customs red tape.

“He sees this agreement as a way to revitalize and re-signify Mercosur,” said Marcelo Elizondo, an Argentine economic analyst specializing in international trade.

The free-trade fever has also infected Brazil’s long-closed economy. Apex, a Brazilian government investment agency, estimates that EU-bound agricultural exports like instant coffee, poultry and orange juice will rake in $7 billion in coming years.

Europe’s farmer lobby wins concessions

Squeezed by environmental regulations and fearing a flood of cheap food products from across the Atlantic, farmers have blocked highways and descended on the streets of European capitals in an explosion of outrage against the agreement.

The EU has scrambled to soothe their concerns over decades of negotiations, adding environmental and animal welfare safeguards to the accord and imposing strict quotas for South American exports of meat and sugar to ensure homegrown produce stays competitive.

Even so, the angry farmers ultimately persuaded France, Poland and a few other states to oppose the deal in last week’s internal EU vote, depriving the accord’s supporters of what they hoped would be a show of unity. Italy and other agricultural powerhouses only came around after the EU offered farmers generous subsidies to the tune of $52 billion.

“It’s a sizable bribe,” said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. “EU leaders decided that the deal is so important at this moment, it’s worth it.”

‘Cows for cars’

Some have dubbed the deal “cows for cars,” reflecting the perception that Europe’s auto industry will also win big.

Clobbered by growing competition with China and sky-high U.S. tariffs, vaunted German auto giants like Volkswagen and BMW are glad for the boost, as are producers in Europe’s pharmaceutical, construction and machinery sectors gaining access to hundreds of millions more consumers.

Experts say that the elimination of 35% tariffs on auto parts and cars gives European industrial exporters a rare chance to claw back their South American market share from cheaper Chinese rivals.

“Failing to sign the EU-Mercosur free trade agreement risked pushing Latin American economies closer to Beijing’s orbit,” said Agathe Demarais, a senior policy fellow with the European Council on Foreign Relations.

But many are still are holding their breath, having watched negotiations lumber along for years only to trip up at the last minute.

“There are still several steps that have to be taken … and Europe continues to be very careful,” Colombo said, straining to be heard over the hollers of cowboys prodding hundreds of bellowing cattle into trucks.

“Let’s not forget, this is historic. We’ve never reached an agreement like this before.”

____

Associated Press writer Mauricio Savarese in Sao Paulo contributed to this report.

The bank reported Q4 net income of $2.5 billion, or $1.19 per diluted share, on $19.9 billion of revenue, down from $2.9 billion, or $1.34 per share, on $19.5 billion a year earlier. On a reported basis (including a Russia-related notable item), EPS of $1.19 and revenue of $19.9 billion topped FactSet estimates of $1.02 and $19.6 billion. On an adjusted basis (excluding the notable item), EPS was $1.81 on $21.0 billion of revenue, ahead of consensus EPS of $1.65 and revenue of $20.9 billion.

“We ended the year in a position of strength, having executed against our strategic priorities,” Citi CFO Mark Mason said on Wednesday morning in his final quarterly media call as finance chief. The bank announced in November that he will step down in early March. Mason, who joined Citi in 2001 and became CFO in 2019, takes over as executive vice chairman and senior executive advisor to chairwoman and CEO Jane Fraser, while Gonzalo Luchetti, head of U.S. personal banking, will succeed him as CFO. I previously reported that his long-term ambition is to become a CEO, according to people familiar with the matter.

Mason said Luchetti has driven 13 consecutive quarters of positive operating leverage in U.S. personal banking, including returns of more than 14% in the fourth quarter and more than 13% for the full year. “I think he is well equipped and armed to come in as our newly appointed CFO and continue the momentum,” he said.

Citi said late last year it would move its retail bank into the wealth business, with the two card businesses run together under Pam Habner. Over the balance of 2026, Mason said he will help with Citi’s May 7 investor day and other strategic initiatives.

Citi is working toward a previously discussed reduction of about 20,000 roles. “We’ve made progress on that since 2022 and 2023, landing in the end of 2025 at 226,000 employees,” Mason said, adding he expects headcount to continue to trend down as productivity improves and tools like AI are implemented. It has been reported that Citi is poised to eliminate about 1,000 positions this week, following earlier rounds of layoffs.

On the economy, Mason said the health of the consumer, overall, has remained resilient. Citi’s largely prime (about 85%) card customer base is showing solid financial discipline, with spending up 5% year over year, but lower‑FICO consumers are feeling more pressure from inflation and higher prices, he explained.

As big banks report earnings, President Donald Trump’s proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10% has surfaced as a key topic. Mason said there is not yet enough detail to speculate, but he called affordability an important issue and said Citi looks forward to working with the administration on a constructive solution. 

“I also say that an interest rate cap is not something that we would or could support,” he said, arguing it would restrict access to credit for those who need it most and have “a deleterious impact on the economy.”

Sheryl Estrada
sheryl.estrada@fortune.com

Leaderboard

Fortune 500 Power Moves

Dennis K. Cinelli was appointed CFO of Paramount, a Skydance Corporation (No. 147), effective Jan. 15, and as such has resigned his board of directors seat. Cinelli will succeed Andrew C. Warren, who has served as EVP and interim CFO since June 2025. Most recently, Cinelli served as CFO of Scale AI. He previously held senior finance and operational roles at Uber, including global head of strategic finance, and later running the U.S. and Canada Mobility (Rides) business. Before Uber, Cinelli was with G.E. Ventures as CFO. 

Every Friday morning, the weekly Fortune 500 Power Moves column tracks Fortune 500 company C-suite shifts—see the most recent edition.

More notable moves:

Deborah Ricci was appointed EVP and CFO of Acentra Health, a technology and health solutions company. Ricci joins Acentra Health from Guidehouse Inc., where she most recently served as partner and chief financial and administrative officer. Earlier in her career, Ricci held multiple senior finance leadership roles, including CFO positions at Constellis, Centerra Group, and A-T Solutions, and began her career as a certified public accountant with KPMG.

Rohan Ranadive was appointed managing director and CFO of GTCR, a private equity firm. Ranadive succeeds Anna May Trala, who is retiring. Trala will remain affiliated with the firm, serving as a senior advisor going forward. Ranadive brings more than 20 years of experience. He joins GTCR from Vista Equity Partners, where he was a managing director of finance operations. Before that, he was the CFO of Aviditi Advisors and spent 12 years at TPG Capital in various finance and accounting leadership roles.

Big Deal

BCG’s AI Radar 2026 global survey, released this morning, finds that CEOs are recognizing that AI is more than a technology; it can fundamentally change how organizations are run.

For example, 94% of CEOs surveyed said they will continue to invest even if AI does not pay off in 2026. CEOs also said they are increasingly hands-on in AI-driven corporate transformation, with 72% saying they are the main decision maker on AI in their organization. Three CEO archetypes emerge, with “trailblazer CEOs” leading end-to-end AI transformation; 60% of trailblazers’ AI budgets will be spent on agentic AI.

“With AI spending set to ramp up further this year, the focus is shifting from ‘how much do we invest?’ to ‘how do we turn bigger AI budgets into real business impact?’” said Vlad Lukic, global leader for AI at Scale at BCG. “The stakes are rising for leadership, as capital alone is not enough without a clear strategy and disciplined execution.”

The findings are based on a global survey of 2,360 executives, including 640 CEOs, across industries at companies earning between at least $100 million and more than $5 billion in annual revenue.

Going deeper

“Can Saks’ new CEO repair the damage done to the luxury retailer by years of being treated as a ‘financial plaything’?” is a Fortune article by Phil Wahba. 

Wahba writes: “For the second time in his career, luxury executive Geoffroy van Raemdonck has been tasked with fixing an iconic department store company brought low by financial engineering. In 2018, he was hired to fix Neiman Marcus Group, which was struggling to to keep up with shifting consumer trends and unprofitable under the weight of heavy debt from years of private equity ownership. This time, the job is twice as big. On Tuesday, Van Raemdonck was appointed CEO of Saks Global, the same day as the luxury department store giant, which includes Neiman Marcus Group (and its Bergdorf Goodman division) and Saks Fifth Avenue, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.” Read the complete article here. 

Overheard

“I’m optimistic that AI won’t hollow out the industrial workforce. In fact, incorporating AI at scale to support a younger workforce may be the only way to sustain it.”

—Kriti Sharma, CEO of IFS Nexus Black, writes in a Fortune opinion piece titled, “AI will infiltrate the industrial workforce in 2026—let’s apply it to training the next generation, not replacing them.”