Connect with us

Business

An anonymous Polymarket trader made $400k betting on Maduro’s downfall—now Washington wants answers

Published

on



On Jan. 3, soon after U.S. forces captured Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro at his compound in Caracas, the political researcher Tyson Brody noticed strange activity on  Polymarket. Brody is one of a growing group of observers who monitor for unusual trades on the platform, which allows people to gamble on the outcome of future events, from the weather to NFL games to governmental upheavals. 

Following Maduro’s capture, Brody found one user, who only created their account a week before, had taken a massive position on Maduro leaving office. The user, Burdensome-Mix, had become the largest holder of “yes” contracts for the event—which paid out in the event Maduro was toppled before the end of January—well before the news of the raid reached the public. The user ended up making over $400,000 from the well-timed trade. Brody’s early morning post quickly went viral, spurring widespread accusations of insider trading and a growing backlash against unchecked prediction markets by lawmakers. 

The controversy comes as courts and regulators struggle to define rules for prediction markets, which have exploded in popularity, with Polymarket netting a $9 billion valuation late last year. Critics argue that trades like the Maduro bet threatens the integrity of U.S. markets, while proponents maintain that companies like Polymarket function as truth machines, informing the public faster than traditional media. Some hardline libertarians even contend that insider trading is a feature, not a bug, with information more likely to surface due to financial incentive. 

Many Democrats disagree, including Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY), who on Friday introduced a bill that would crack down on government employees’ ability to use the platforms. “The intersection of insider trading and government decision making is not only corrupting to the market, it’s corrupting the government itself,” Torres told Fortune in an interview. 

Betting on the future

Prediction markets have existed in the U.S. for decades on a small scale, but the twin rise of Polymarket and rival Kalshi over the past few years has vaulted them into the mainstream—and raised questions about how to police the nascent platforms. Kalshi won a crucial court victory before the 2024 presidential election that allowed it to list political contracts, while Polymarket is poised to return to the U.S. after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission barred it from operating in the country in 2022. 

As Kalshi and Polymarket have grown, they have moved into all sorts of sectors, from sports to political contracts, where users might have insider knowledge of future events. In its rulebook, Kalshi explicitly bans insider trading from anyone who has access to material nonpublic information related to a contract, or could exert influence on the subject of the contract. Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan has stated that his platform can self-police insider trading by its own users and has the ability to conduct internal audits, the Wall Street Journal reported. A Polymarket spokesperson declined to comment. 

Torres’s bill would narrowly focus on government employees, banning anyone from trading on prediction market platforms who has access to material nonpublic information relevant to the contract—or, more broadly, who could reasonably obtain the information.

A former CFTC attorney, who spoke with Fortune on the condition of anonymity due to potential client conflicts, said this would represent an expansion of how the agency currently polices government insider trading, including the so-called “Eddie Murphy rule,” named for the actor’s film Trading Places, which prohibits trading on misappropriated government information. 

Torres’s senior advisor Benny Stanislawski told Fortune that the idea was to start with a wide scope that could later be narrowed by the agency during the rulemaking process. Still, he argued it was important to include people who might reasonably get access to insider information given the often porous nature of government, such as a House staffer overhearing a discussion in the halls of the U.S. Capitol. The effort mirrors other legislative initiatives to ban lawmakers from trading individual stocks.  

Even if Torres’s bill does pass, questions remain about whether the perpetually underfunded CFTC has the capacity to investigate insider trading allegations, especially given the vast array of markets that Polymarket and Kalshi operate in and people who could have access to material nonpublic information. “If there were a significant amount of [insider trading] going on, it would be very hard with the agency’s current resources to effectively police them,” said the former CFTC attorney, who noted that most of the agency’s leads come from whistleblowers. 

Kalshi cofounder Tarek Mansour endorsed Torres’s bill in a LinkedIn post, implying that Polymarket is an “unregulated, non-American” company. Torres told Fortune that he sees his proposed legislation as a starting point to implement more robust regulation for prediction markets, though he admitted he has not yet received bipartisan support. “The status quo strikes me as unsustainable,” Torres said. On Friday, his colleague Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nev.) sent a letter to Polymarket’s Coplan requesting more information on his platform’s safeguards to prevent insider trading. Republican lawmakers have not publicly commented on Torres and Titus’s efforts.  

Mansour has stated that the long-term goal of his company is to “financialize everything” by turning any difference in opinion, from the deposition of world leaders to the outcome of a basketball game, into a tradable asset. But for Brody, the political strategist who surfaced the Maduro trade, the latest episode is just another example of the unfair nature of the financial system. “It hits all the corruption high notes while happening brazenly in the open,” he told Fortune. “Prediction markets can confirm a lot of people’s nagging suspicions about systems being rigged and honestly being penalized instead of rewarded in today’s economy.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Down Arrow Button Icon

Published

on



The alphabet soup of interpretations for today’s economy has lately landed on the letter “K” to describe the diverging ways inflation has impacted Americans: boom times for the asset-wealthy at the top, and a much more painful moment for those struggling to stay afloat amid rising prices for groceries and electricity.

The logic of the K-shaped economy has been used to explain why consumption has yet to dip towards recession levels. While low-income shoppers are cutting back on spending, high earners keep infusing the economy with their cash, fueled by stock and real estate gains. One estimate by Moody’s Analytics calculated last year that the top 10% of earners made up nearly half of all consumer spending.

Economists as well as Fed Chair Jerome Powell have said that model will be unsustainable in the long run, risking widening wealth inequality or a broader economic downturn if the wealthy are unable to maintain their spending habits.

But what if they can? Analysts have warned that a stock market slump could force high rollers to tighten their belts too, but some economists say there is reason to believe lavish spending will persevere. Many of the economy’s highest spenders fall relatively neatly into demographic age groups with predictable consumption habits. For them, there could yet be good times ahead.

Instead of K-shaped, a more useful way to break down the current economy would be by age groups, according to Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, who in a blog post last week described how he might interpret today’s divergence in spending.

“We believe that a better way to understand consumer resilience is to focus on what we call the ‘gen-shaped’ economy,”  the market veteran wrote.

The highest spenders today are the 76 million baby boomers who made out the best from appreciating asset prices over the past few years. Meanwhile, Gen Zers and millennials are relatively new to the labor force. A high youth unemployment rate, tight labor market for junior roles, and mounting student loan and credit card debt mean many younger Americans are struggling financially, Yardeni explained, and likely account for much of the spending slowdown at the bottom end of the K.

Baby boomers might be leaving their healthy paychecks behind as they retire in greater numbers, but they depart the workforce as the wealthiest generation in history, with a net worth of around $85.4 trillion, he added. While younger Americans struggle to buy their first home or break into the stock market, boomers retain their tight grip on assets. Because of their deep pockets in savings, Yardeni expects boomers to keep up their spending well into retirement.

Gen Z and millennials will have to wait until later in their career to dream of having similar net worths. In the meantime, Yardeni wrote, many are likely to continue receiving financial support from their well-off parents. 

Younger Americans do eventually stand to inherit much of the wealth baby boomers have accumulated. The so-called “Great Wealth Transfer” could be worth as much as $124 trillion, with nearly $300 billion inherited last year alone. But this mass inheritance will take time to play out in its entirety, with some analysts estimating Gen Z and millennials will continue receiving these funds until 2048. 

To be sure, the wealth transfer will be contested between widows and charities as well as children, and not all younger Americans are likely to receive enough financial support from their parents to compete in today’s economy with many struggling to afford a home. 

But for now, there are few signs of sunsetting for baby boomers’ amassed wealth. In 2023, more than half of corporate equities and mutual fund shares were in the generation’s hands. 

“Baby boomers can’t possibly spend all this, so some of this is going to flow down,” Yardeni said in a video last week discussing the gen-shaped economy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

5 daily tasks that can double as exercise

Published

on



Send this to someone who hates the gym but loves home improvement: Research shows that you can get some of the key benefits of a workout just by putting some extra oomph into your chores.

It’s like doing daily activities on hard mode. Raising your heart rate for just one to two minutes, three to four times per day, can lower your risks of cardiovascular disease and early death, compared to people with sedentary lifestyles, according to recent studies. To accrue those minutes, some researchers recommend working it into your daily routine, whether that means playing with your dog, power walking between household tasks, or taking multiple trips up and down the stairs to purge your closet.

Have a fireplace? Try swinging an axe

Fans of the so-called lumberjack workout swear that there’s no better way to engage all your muscles than by chopping timber. Chris Hemsworth, who typically wields a magical hammer, got in on the trend in recent years, Instagramming a video of himself splitting wood in his backyard that’s now one of his most-liked posts.

Meanwhile, TikTok’s favorite log cutter is a Californian named Thoren “Thor” Bradley, who has amassed more than 10 million followers by splitting enormous pieces of wood and sometimes taking his shirt off. He also sells conventional fitness coaching.

British actress Elizabeth Hurley was early on the trend. She told Extra in 2019 that, at the age of 54, she got her exercise from “gardening…cutting down a hedge, using my chainsaw to cut down a tree, logging.” Proceed with caution, y’all.—ML

This report was originally published by Morning Brew.

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Down Arrow Button Icon

Published

on



Saving for retirement is pointless thanks to the impending “supersonic tsunami” of AI and robotics, which will bring about a world of zero scarcity, according to Elon Musk.

While the Tesla and SpaceX CEO admitted he’s “more optimistic” than most, he insisted people shouldn’t stress over building a nest egg for the distant future, contrary to the staid advice of nearly all other financial professionals.

“Don’t worry about squirreling money away for retirement in 10 or 20 years,” said the world’s richest man on the Moonshots with Peter Diamandis podcast last week. “It won’t matter.”

Part of Musk’s controversial take lies in his vision of a world transformed by rapidly improving AI, robotics, and energy technology.

Musk’s hot take

By 2030, AI will surpass “the intelligence of all humans combined,” Musk predicted. He also claimed eventually there will be more humanoid robots than humans on Earth. Slowly, the traditional job will be replaced as well, with white collar positions first on the list.

“Anything short of shaping atoms, AI can do probably half or more of those jobs right now,” he said.

The advances could lead to such big productivity increases, he said, that they will surpass “what people possibly could think of as abundance.” 

Rather than a universal income, everyone will enjoy a “universal ‘you can have whatever you want’ income” in the future, he claimed. In this world, the link between individual wages, savings, and living standards no longer makes sense.

Even without savings, AI will help people obtain better medical care than currently available within five years, as well as remove any limit on the availability of goods, services, or educational opportunities.

​Musk’s comments build on his earlier claims that AI and humanoid robots will make work “optional” within 10 to 20 years and render money itself irrelevant. Musk previously compared the future of work to leisure activities like playing sports or video games rather than a survival necessity.

“If you want to work, [it’s] the same way you can go to the store and just buy some vegetables, or you can grow vegetables in your backyard. It’s much harder to grow vegetables in your backyard, and some people still do it because they like growing vegetables,” Musk said during the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum in November.

Post-work’s downsides

​To be sure, Musk’s predictions about the future come at a time where many Americans are struggling to save. In part due to persistent inflation and weak wage growth, only 55% of American adults said they had a “rainy day” fund of three months expenses saved up for an emergency, down from a high of 59% in 2021, according to a survey by the Federal Reserve. Fewer than half of those surveyed said they could cover an expense of $2,000 or more with their savings. 

​Surveys also consistently show a large share of Americans are behind on retirement savings or have little to nothing set aside for their post-work life.

Musk is also not blind to the potential downsides of a society without the need to earn a living. A high universal income could come hand-in-hand with social unrest, as people may face a deeper crisis of meaning, he warned. 

“If you actually get all the stuff you want, is that actually the future you want? Because it means that your job won’t matter,” Musk said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.