Connect with us

Business

Down Arrow Button Icon

Published

on



Claire Isnard can trace her 40‑year career—including 17 years at fashion house Chanel—back to one bad exam. Had she passed, she’d likely still be in a classroom, grading essays on Italian literature.

Looking back, in her first-ever sit-down interview ahead of her retirement, Isnard says she feels like she’s come full circle. Despite having zero HR qualifications, she wound up as Chanel’s chief people and chief organization officer. “When you draw my story back, the first compelling and meaningful thing that would end up spread across everything I’ve done is helping people become who they didn’t think they can become,” she told Fortune.

“For me, teaching was not about the speciality of French or Italian, it was about helping those young people—especially the ones who were having difficulty unleashing their skill set and couldn’t find themselves internally, I could help them become larger, bigger than what they thought,” she said. “And I loved it very much.”

At the time, Isnard took that career plan “very, very seriously” and was giving language lessons to teenagers in both Italy and France while studying, which made the final exam failure that would have cemented a lifelong academic career all the more confusing.

“Not only I failed,” Isnard said, “but I didn’t know what I wanted to do. I had no clear path ahead of me. I had no clear goal.” 

With no plan B, she went back to school and threw herself into student forums and networking events. It led to a chance encounter that would drag her from the classroom into consulting—and eventually, right into Chanel’s corner office.

Gen Z: Failure might be your lucky break—but not if you don’t get out

40 years later, Isnard still remembers how crushing that first experience of failure was—but she refuses to let younger generations see similar setbacks as the end of the story.

Now, the lesson she reminds her millennial children (who are 30 and 33) is that failure is simply “a roadblock on the road, not the end of the road.” 

“It hurts, it’s very uncomfortable,” Isnard said. “It can be very frustrating because you worked hard. Although it may not feel like it in the moment, this pause could be a blessing in disguise.”

Isnard recommends using failure as an opportunity to reassess the direction you’re going down—as well as whether you’re even enjoying it. 

“There is a signal here that either you’ve not worked enough—if you really want to do it again, work harder, and you will get it—or maybe there was something that was not for you,” she said. “Look at what you enjoyed in doing that, but also look at the thing you don’t enjoy, and go where your passion is… I’m really convinced that we cannot be good at something we don’t like doing.”

Of course, passion alone is not enough to land a big break after a failure. It doesn’t matter how much you love talking about luxury brands or coding—if you don’t get out of your comfort zone and show them, no one will know. That’s why Isnard recommends Gen Zers simply get out into the world.

“If you stay in your room, or behind your computer, you just don’t get those moments of connection that spark a different conversation, or open your mind to possibility, or let you meet someone who finds something interesting in you,” she said. 

She would know. Just one “lucky” conversation with the founder of a boutique consultancy at a student forum turned into a two-decade career in the industry, including climbing up Aon Hewitt’s ranks (formerly known as Hewitt Associates) to managing director.

“I was present in all forums, in all networks, where I could meet people that I would not meet otherwise, and it was a series of encounters that brought me to the woman who hired me,” she said. “So I really believe in connection. I really believe in going outside of your comfort zone—open that door, be curious, meet with people, enter the conversation.”

Isnard says you don’t need a slick five-year plan, or even a full-to-the-brim contacts book—just the courage to start up conversation in a room full of strangers. 

“Everyone knows someone,” she said. “So I didn’t hesitate to say, I’m hungry for work and I would like to do something that has to do with writing, thinking and being helpful to others.”

The brutally honest answer that got her poached by Chanel

Being courageous worked out in Isnard’s favour when Chanel was a client of hers. Soon after the company had hired its first-ever global CEO, Maureen Shekels, she directly asked Isnard one tough-to-answer question: Do I have what I need to act as a global CEO?

The answer, Isnard gave her, was brutally honest: No. 

For eight years, she had partnered with the fashion brand on “different, strategic problems.” And that proximity became vital when its new boss asked her to carry out a no‑nonsense diagnosis of her leadership and how to bring the luxury brand out of an outdated, fragmented structure.

“So we designed together a global model for the future,” Isnard said. “It’s easier for a consultant to tell [the harsh truth] because you have objectivity, you don’t have the emotion of being inside. I was not losing anything; I was helping my client to see through what she needed for the future.”

But what Isnard perhaps didn’t expect was to get poached by the CEO herself, just two years later in 2008: “I was very surprised, because I’ve never been an HR in my life before,” Isnard recalled, before adding she didn’t think twice before accepting despite feeling a mixture of honoured, intimidated, and frankly, a bit scared.

“I had to move with my family to New York from France,” she said. “I had to learn how to be an insider—I knew everybody, all the leaders, but from the outside. I had to build a team. There was no global team in HR. I had to do everything from scratch.”

Despite her lack of formal HR credentials, Chanel’s global footprint has expanded dramatically over the past two decades. Today, the brand operates in roughly 70 countries worldwide with over 600 boutiques. Under Isnard’s watch, its workforce has more than tripled, growing to 38,400 employees worldwide.

“It’s another story of someone placing trust in you,” she added. “Take risk, pivot, but do it with people you trust—who trust you too. And check that you have the passion for what is to come.” 

What comes after Chanel’s corner office?

Now, as she prepares to step down after over 17 years as Chanel’s chief people and organization officer, Isnard faces a familiar uncertainty—the same feeling she had after that first failed exam. Only this time, she’s looking forward to it.

“The next chapter for me is to be invented, which is also back to the first conversation, how will I take risk—or not? Am I going to meet with other people? It’s all about the new possibilities that will unfold.” 

The outgoing exec, who says she’s been reflecting on what her purpose is and will take some more time to ponder, already knows she wants to “continue being contributive,” even in retirement. 

“The worst is if you feel lost and you feel abandoned. But I think the other worst is that you get another kind of frenetic, but it has no meaning. It’s just a bunch of activities for the sake of not being by yourself. These are the things that I want to absolutely avoid,” she said.

In the end, she hints she may just go back to where it all began: In teaching, some way or another.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Top AI defense CEO sees China planning for a ‘very protracted conflict’ and the U.S. running out of weapons in 7 days

Published

on



When it comes to a potential future conflict, especially with China, the U.S. may be on its back foot, claim experts at the intersection of AI and defense.

Speaking at the Fortune Brainstorm AI conference in San Francisco last week, Tara Murphy Dougherty, the CEO of defense software company Govini, said that in a conflict with China the U.S. could run out of some munitions in seven days, while China could potentially hold out longer.

“They are planning for a very protracted conflict, and would be happy to draw that fight out to bleed American stockpiles dry, because they aren’t missing the economic piece of this puzzle,” Dougherty said.

This possibility should be troubling to the U.S., and yet there is no easy fix, explained Dougherty. The U.S. stockpile of munitions and other war time resources are held up by various obstacles established over years, she said.

“Unfortunately, those stockpiles are low enough, and the United States has outsourced so much manufacturing capacity at this point, that the amount of time it will take to build the munitions and weapons systems that the United States needs is just much, much too long,” she said.

The U.S. could indeed run out some munitions especially in a conflict with China over the Taiwan strait, according to a study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Still, the study only singled out certain types of munitions such as long range and precision-guided munitions in under a week.

At the same time, the U.S. has the second most number of nuclear warheads, just behind Russia, and significantly more than China’s 600, according to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapon (ICAN).

The war in Ukraine, which has escalated since Russia’s invasion in 2022, has shown the need for countries to be nimble when it comes to the resources required for war. Yet, in a war time situation it’s unclear how quickly the U.S. would be able to mobilize, Dougherty added. 

“Our weapon systems and military platforms have historically low operational availability, which basically means, if we need to go to war, half the fleet is sitting in depot or at dock,” she said.

The Trump administration and Department of War secretary Pete Hegseth have tried to spur a change in the status quo. Earlier this year, Hegseth sent a memo to senior Pentagon leadership asking for the Army to restructure its acquisition systems and close redundant and inefficient programs.

Using AI, though, may be another way to help America’s war readiness, added Gary Steele, the CEO of AI-powered autonomous systems company Shield AI. Steele said AI will completely transform the aerospace and defense industry so much so that in 20 years it will look radically different.

“You’re gonna have lower cost systems, AI-led, software-led, not these super expensive, incredibly elaborate systems that just get shut down,” said Steele. “I think there’s a revolution happening, and we’re at the very beginning of that journey.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Lovable hits $6.6 billion valuation as its CEO says it wants to be ‘the last piece of software’ companies ever buy

Published

on



Swedish AI coding startup Lovable has just raised $330 million in Series B funding round at a $6.6 billion valuation, more than tripling its worth from just five months ago. CEO Anton Osika told Fortune the funding would further the company’s mission to become “the last piece of software” needed by companies and developers.

The round was led by CapitalG and Menlo Ventures’ Anthology fund, with participation from NVIDIA’s venture arm NVentures, Salesforce Ventures, Databricks Ventures, and strategic investors including Atlassian Ventures and HubSpot Ventures. It comes just one month after Lovable announced it had hit $200 million in annual recurring revenue.

The company has grand aims to make software engineering accessible to anyone by promoting “vibe-coding,” a process in which a user describes in plain language the product they want to build or the function of a piece of software they want to create, and AI writes the code to produce that result. 

“Our mission is to let anyone be a builder,” Osika said.

He predicted a world where every company can build its own bespoke software, rather than depending on expensive, and less customized products from major tech vendors. For instance, rather than purchasing different tools for customer relationship management, project tracking, or inventory management, Osika envisions companies using Lovable to simply build whatever they need on demand. 

Companies are already seeing results from some of Lovable’s products. At Zendesk, teams using Lovable have been able to move from idea to working prototype in three hours instead of six weeks, according to Jorge Luthe, the company’s Senior Director of Product. While at management consulting firm McKinsey, Osika said engineers used his company’s product to build in a few hours what they had been waiting four to six months for their internal development team to deliver.

“Anyone being able to go with an arbitrary software problem and just explain it to Lovable and solve it, is becoming a universal reality,” he said. 

Skeptics say that vibe coding doesn’t always result in the best quality software. The code vibe coding tools produce can be inefficient or contain security flaws that could present a serious risk to the company deploying it, depending on what it is being used for. In addition, just because tools like Lovable allow people without any coding experience to create software for their specific needs, it doesn’t mean that those non-developers will be able to maintain that code over time, these critics say.

Lovable says it sees three main use cases emerge among enterprise customers, Osika said. Some organizations are building core business systems entirely on Lovable; others are using it to build internal tools that previously stalled in development backlogs for months; and some product teams are using it to validate ideas with functional prototypes rather than static designs.

“Enterprises are reworking entire workflows with AI, because you can build AI applications with Lovable in just one prompt,” Osika said. “It becomes kind of the work where work gets done.”

Competition heats up in AI-powered coding

Lovable is operating in an increasingly competitive landscape and facing competition from fellow start-ups as well as bigger players that are now releasing their own coding products. While Lovable uses foundational models from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic to power its own product, these companies are now releasing their own coding tools that could compete more directly.

“We just see them as partners,” Okisa said of the competition with major AI labs. “I think as software and AI kind of converges, there’s going to be more overlap in what companies do, but what people say and why they choose us, despite that there are other alternatives, is that Lovable just works.”

Matt Murphy, a partner at Menlo Ventures who led the investment, said that Lovable’s strategy is to build a “beloved layer” of software on top of the AI labs’ models that customers want to pay for. “The numbers speak for themselves,” Murphy said, noting that Lovable has transformed a latent market of tens of millions of people into developers.

“Lovable has done something rare: built a product that enterprises and founders both love. The demand we’re seeing from Fortune 500 companies signals a fundamental shift in how software gets built,” Laela Sturdy, Managing Partner at CapitalG added.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

As graduates face a ‘jobpocalypse,’ Goldman Sachs exec tells Gen Z they need to know their commercial impact

Published

on



For Gen Z, the entry-level career ladder is getting steeper by the month—and there’s no sign of it letting up. Unemployment among recent grads has climbed to 5.8% (the highest since 2013, excluding the pandemic) as companies rethink hiring amid AI-driven productivity gains.

The pressure is already forcing young people to rethink what it takes to stand out—especially in fields where six-figure pay once felt like a given. But for those aiming for Wall Street, one Goldman Sachs executive has a blunt message for young professionals trying to get ahead: Know what you bring to the table.

“Think about one’s role and how that fits into the broader business environment,” David Kostin, Goldman Sachs’ chief U.S. equity strategist, said on the Goldman Sachs’ Exchanges podcast

“If you understand where you sit and your contributions to the commercial process, then you can see how that changes over time.”

As AI-powered automation replaces jobs at a fraction of the cost of human labor, understanding the value of your own skills—and whether tools like ChatGPT can outperform them—has never been more critical. Investing in the development of in-demand skills may well determine whether you remain employable in the future.

Don’t know your worth? Human skills are also in demand

Luckily for those unable to put an exact number to their job function, it’s not just commercial awareness that is key in the current market. 

Kostin’s advice reflects a broader shift inside Wall Street firms, where technical skills, like using AI tools, are increasingly expected—but no longer enough on their own. 

Judgement, context, and self-awareness are also becoming real differentiators.

Data from LinkedIn backs up Kostin’s thinking. While AI literacy tops the professional networking company’s list of the fastest-growing skills in the U.S., softer skills like conflict mitigation, adaptability, process optimization, and innovative thinking round out the top five.

AI won’t kill Wall Street jobs —but it’s ramping up competitive pressure

Goldman Sachs’ CEO David Solomon has echoed the view that for those with dreams to one day earn six figures on Wall Street, not all is lost, and AI is not expected to be an outright job killer for bankers.

“There is no question that when you put these tools in the hands of smart people, it increases their productivity,” Solomon told Axios in October. “You’re going to see changes in the way analysts, associates, and investment bankers work.”

“But if you’re looking at it and assuming an organization like Goldman Sachs…is just going to have less people, I don’t think it works that way,” he added.

Even so, the pipeline into Wall Street is tightening. At several business schools, including NYU (Stern), MIT (Sloan), and Dartmouth (Tuck), the share of graduates entering investment banking has slowly declined. At Harvard and Columbia, placements have held up better, underscoring how competitive the path has become.

And even for those who manage to break in, the ride isn’t always smooth. Layoffs remain a constant threat in an industry prone to cyclical downturns, and some junior bankers have already faced this reality.

Solomon has urged young employees not to shy away from opportunities.

“I would tell you that sometimes the best opportunities come from being asked to do something you don’t want to do, and actually taking it on and trying to do it. Because that’s when people grow the most. That’s where I grew the most,” Solomon told his company’s summer interns in July.

Looking ahead, Solomon encouraged patience in an era defined by uncertainty.

“You have no idea where your career will take you, you have no idea where your life will take you,” Solomon added. “But it’s an incredible journey and you’re at the beginning of it, and my biggest and most important message is don’t be in a hurry.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.