Connect with us

Business

Government belatedly reveals loss of 105,000 jobs in October as full DOGE cutbacks come into view

Published

on



The United States gained a decent 64,000 jobs in November but lost 105,000 in October as federal workers departed after cutbacks by the Trump administration, the government said in delayed reports.

The unemployment rate rose to 4.6%, highest since 2021.

Both the October and November job creation numbers, released Tuesday by the Labor Department, came in late because of the 43-day federal government shutdown.

The November job gains came in higher than the 40,000 economists had forecast. The October job losses were caused by a 162,000 drop in federal workers, many of whom resigned at the end of fiscal year 2025 on Sept. 30 under pressure from billionaire Elon Musk’s purge of U.S. government payrolls.

Labor Department revisions also knocked 33,000 jobs off August and September payrolls.

Workers’ average hourly earnings rose just 0.1% from October, the smallest gain since August 2023. Compared to a year earlier, pay was up 3.5%, the lowest since May 2021.

Healthcare employers added more than 46,000 jobs in November, accounting for more than two-thirds of the 69,000 private sector jobs created last month. Construction companies added 28,000 jobs. Manufacturing shed jobs for the seventh straight month, losing 5,000 jobs in November.

Hiring has clearly lost momentum, hobbled by uncertainty over President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the lingering effects of the high interest rates the Federal Reserve engineered in 2022 and 2023 to rein in an outburst of inflation.

American companies are mostly holding onto the employees they have. But they’re reluctant to hire new ones as they struggle to assess how to use artificial intelligence and how to adjust to Trump’s unpredictable policies, especially his double-digit taxes on imports from around the world.

The uncertainty leaves jobseekers struggling to find work or even land interviews. Federal Reserve policymakers are divided over whether the labor market needs more help from lower interest rates. Their deliberations are rendered more difficult because official reports on the economy’s health are coming in late and incomplete after a 43-day government shutdown.

Labor Department revisions in September showed that the economy created 911,000 fewer jobs than originally reported in the year that ended in March. That meant that employers added an average of just 71,000 new jobs a month over that period, not the 147,000 first reported. Since March, job creation has fallen farther — to an average 35,000 a month.

The unemployment rate, though still modest by historical standards, has risen since bottoming out at a 54-year low of 3.4% in April 2023.

“The takeaway is that the labor market remains on a relatively soft footing, with employers showing little appetite to hire, but are also reluctant to fire,” Thomas Feltmate, senior economist at TD Economics, wrote in a commentary. “That said, labor demand has cooled more than supply in recent months, which is what’s behind the steady upward drift in the unemployment rate.’’

Adding to the uncertainty is the growing use of artificial intelligence and other technologies that can reduce demand for workers.

“We’ve seen a lot of the businesses that we support are stuck in that stagnant mode: ‘Are we going to hire or are we not? What can we automate? What do we need the human touch with?’’’ said Matt Hobbie, vice president of the staffing firm HealthSkil in Allentown, Pennsylvania.

“We’re in Lehigh Valley, which is a big transportation hub in eastern Pennsylvania. We’ve seen some cooling in the logistics and transportation markets, specifically because we’ve seen automation in those sectors, robotics.’’

Worries about the job market were enough to nudge the Fed into cutting its benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last week for the third time this year.

But three Fed officials refused to go along with the move, the most dissents in six years. Some Fed officials are balking at further cuts while inflation remains above the central bank’s 2% target. Two voted to keep the rate unchanged. Stephen Miran, appointed by Trump to the Fed’s governing board in September, voted for a bigger cut – in line with what the president demands.

Tuesday’s report shows that “the labor market remains weak, but the pace of deterioration probably is too slow to spur the (Fed) to ease again in January,” Samuel Tombs, chief U.S. economist at Pantheon Macroeconimics, wrote in a commentary. The Fed holds its next policy meeting Jan. 27-28.

Because of the government shutdown, the Labor Department did not release its jobs reports for September, October and November on time.

It finally put out the September jobs report on Nov. 20, seven weeks late. It published some of the October data – including a count of the jobs created that month by businesses, nonprofits and government agencies – along with the November report Tuesday. But it did not release an unemployment rate for October because it could not calculate the number during the shutdown.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Federal regulators are investigating Nevada OSHA after Boring Co. citations were suddenly withdrawn

Published

on



The U.S. federal workplace safety regulator has opened an investigation into Nevada’s state OSHA agency weeks after Fortune reported that three citations the state agency had issued against Elon Musk’s Boring Company were suddenly withdrawn, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Nevada OSHA confirmed that the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration had received a complaint about the state agency and had opened a federal review into whether Nevada OSHA was at least as effective as the federal agency—a requirement for all state OSHA plans under U.S. law.

The federal inquiry comes about one month after Fortune published an investigation revealing that Nevada OSHA had issued three “willful” and serious citations to Boring Company, the tunneling venture founded by Elon Musk that is digging an underground Tesla tunnel system below Las Vegas and the broader county. The citations were handed to Boring after two firefighters were burned by chemicals in one of its tunnels during a training drill. Shortly after the citations were issued earlier this year, Boring Company’s president called a member of Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo’s Office and set up a meeting with senior state officials, and the state agency rescinded those citations within 24 hours. The removal of the citations was not documented in the case file, and a line item in Nevada OSHA’s case diary that described the meeting was later deleted from a public record, Fortune found. 

Nevada OSHA and the state agencies that sit above it have maintained that Nevada OSHA withdrew the citations after the phone call because it determined that the citations had not met legal requirements, and were therefore not valid. Nevada OSHA has also said that the governor’s office regularly receives complaints from businesses in the state and that this instance only stands out “due to the high-profile nature of the business because of its affiliation with Elon Musk.”

Lawyers and regulators in the state, however, said the handling of the citations violated OSHA’s standard procedure, and the episode sparked outrage among some politicians, including Nevada Congresswoman Dina Titus, who sent a letter to Governor Joe Lombardo urging him to hold Elon Musk’s tunneling company accountable, make the company’s meetings with Nevada OSHA public, and answer a series of questions about how the investigation was handled. A spokeswoman for Nevada Senator Catherine Cortez Masto also told Fortune that Cortez Masto’s office “supports inquiries to ensure that the Boring Company was made to follow and comply with all OSHA rules.”

It’s unclear at this time who filed the complaint that sparked the federal investigation, formally called a “Complaint About State Plan Administration” or a “CASPA,” nor precisely when it was filed. The Labor Department’s records office confirmed that a CASPA had been filed against Nevada OSHA, though it declined to provide the complaint because it is “part of an enforcement proceeding” and “could interfere with OSHA’s ability to effectively enforce the law.” Separately, a Labor Department spokeswoman said that federal OSHA doesn’t comment on state plan investigations or determinations.

These types of inquiries typically take fewer than 60 days to complete, according to OSHA’s policy manual, which details the process. During an investigation, the regional office will review Nevada OSHA’s case file, interview state plan officials and employees as well as other individuals involved. The regional office would also review the effectiveness of the state plan’s policies and procedures, according to the manual. Nevada OSHA itself will have 30 days to respond to the CASPA, and the state agency’s own determination will be considered in the investigation, the manual shows.

This is not the first time that Nevada OSHA has been under scrutiny from federal OSHA. In 2009, federal OSHA initiated a “special study” into the plan after the Las Vegas Sun reported on the agency’s handling of fatalities during the construction of the CityCenter project on the Las Vegas Strip.

Jordan Barab, who initiated that study into Nevada OSHA during his time leading the federal agency under the Obama Administration, tells Fortune that, because of the high-profile nature of this new inquiry, the top leaders of the federal agency have likely been looped in. “This would definitely have come to the attention of the Assistant Secretary, and probably beyond, given that it involves Elon Musk,” Barab says.

Barab suggested that, should federal OSHA find deficiencies with Nevada’s state plan, the regulator could direct Nevada to make corrections to this specific case or amend the agency’s procedures. 

Since the 2009 special study, Barab said that Nevada OSHA had “cleaned up their act” and “appointed some very responsible, competent people to run the program.”

In OSHA’s latest annual report on the Nevada state plan, which was published in 2024 and is publicly available on the regulator’s website, federal OSHA said that Nevada’s state plan had made notable improvements to its workplace culture and staff retention rates—with 95% of positions filled—but criticized the agency’s documentation process, saying that documents had been missing from its case files.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Warner Bros. plans to reject Paramount bid on funding, terms

Published

on



Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. is planning to reject Paramount Skydance Corp.’s hostile takeover bid due to concerns about financing and other terms, people familiar with the matter said.

After deliberating and reviewing Paramount’s bid, Warner Bros.’ board will urge shareholders to reject the tender offer, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential information. The board still views the company’s existing agreement with streaming leader Netflix Inc. as offering greater value, certainty and terms than what Paramount has proposed, they said.

Warner Bros.’ response to Paramount’s tender offer could be filed as early as Wednesday, the people added. No final decision has been made and the situation remains fluid, they said. Representatives for Warner Bros. and Paramount declined to comment.

One major sticking point is Warner Bros.’ concern about the financing proposed by Paramount, which is led by David Ellison.

The equity is backstopped by a trust that manages the wealth of his father, software billionaire Larry Ellison. Because it’s a revocable trust, assets can be taken out of it at any time, and Warner Bros. may have no recourse if that happens, the people said. 

One of Paramount’s backers dropped out the deal Tuesday. Affinity Partners, led by President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, told Bloomberg News it was withdrawing from the proposed transaction, citing the involvement of “two strong competitors.”

Earlier Tuesday, President Trump criticized Paramount, saying on social media that he’s been treated “far worse” by the company’s CBS division since the Ellison family took control earlier this year. The Ellisons have touted their friendly ties to the president.

Warner Bros.’ board is also concerned about the company’s ability to conduct business for the year or more it could take for a sale to win regulatory approval. Paramount isn’t offering the company enough flexibility to run its business or manage its balance sheet, the people said. 

Paramount said in a filing last week that it had addressed Warner Bros. concerns about the company’s flexibility in refinancing debt as well as payment of a $5 billion break up fee that would be backstopped by the Ellison family. 

Paramount has adjusted terms of its bid in response to Warner Bros.’ requests in other ways. Some $1 billion in financing from China’s Tencent Holdings Ltd. was withdrawn over concerns the funding could cause national security concerns with US regulators. 

Warner Bros. agreed this month to sell its studios, streaming business and HBO to Netflix for $27.75 a share, or about $83 billion including debt, capping off a multiweek bidding war between Netflix, Paramount and Comcast Corp. Warner Bros. separately plans to spin off cable networks like CNN and TNT to its shareholders before the Netflix deal closes.

Paramount, which owns MTV and the Paramount+ streaming service, has offered to buy all of Warner Bros. for $30 a share, or more than $108 billion, including debt. Three days after Netflix and Warner Bros. announced their deal, Paramount took its offer directly to shareholders by launching a public tender offer for Warner Bros. shares. 

Paramount has said that its $30-a-share offer for Warner Bros. isn’t its “best and final,” implying it has room to raise its bid. Shares of Warner Bros. closed at $28.90 in New York, suggesting some investors expect the company to fetch a higher price. 

Warner Bros.’ agreement with Netflix bars it from soliciting proposals from other bidders but it’s allowed to entertain proposals that come in. In the event of a superior proposal, it’s required to give Netflix the opportunity to match the better offer to try to keep their existing deal intact, according to their agreement. 

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump turns on CBS, Kushner pulls out and Paramount’s hostile bid for Warner Bros. shows signs of collapse

Published

on



Paramount’s hostile bid for Warner Bros. showed signs of unraveling just moments after President Donald Trump aired fresh grievances about the flagship newsmagazine 60 Minutes. Just hours after Trump’s latest lashed out at CBS News, accusing the Paramount-owned network of treating him “far worse” since its new ownership took over earlier this year, Jared Kushner pulled his Affinity Partners private equity firm out of the Warner bid, as reports swirled that the Looney Tunes studio planned to reject the star-topped mountain. 

“For those people that think I am close with the new owners of CBS, please understand that 60 Minutes has treated me far worse since the so-called ‘takeover,’ than they have ever treated me before,” Trump said. “If they are friends, I’d hate to see my enemies!”

Paramount had entered the bidding for Warner, with its $77.9 billion offer for all of Warner Bros. Discovery coming one working day after Netflix’s $72 billion offer for the studio and HBO Max, as a seeming friend of the White House.

CEO David Ellison has repeatedly highlighted his ties to Trump, with his father Larry a longtime Trump donor (and second-richest man alive). CBS News, under Ellison, recently installed Bari Weiss, owner of independent news organization The Free Press and a prominent critic of progressive media culture, in a senior editorial role, a move widely read in Hollywood and Washington as gestures toward an anti-“woke” White House. Kushner’s participation, as son-in-law to the President, reinforced that impression. His roughly $200 million equity commitment via his firm functioned, some analysts said, as a political signal as much as a financing tool.

Trump’s outburst disrupted that calculus. By openly distancing himself from Paramount and criticizing its flagship news division, the president stripped the bid of its most implicit advantage: the perception of regulatory goodwill. Almost immediately after Trump’s post circulated, Affinity announced it was exiting the deal, citing a shift in “investment dynamics” amid competition from Netflix. Now, reports indicate that Warner Bros. plans to reject Paramount’s hostile bid over financing concerns. 

Trump’s public remarks have continuously scrambled assumptions about his supposed friendships, or loyalties. He confirmed to reporters at the Kennedy Center, the weekend after Netflix’s bid, that he had met with Co-CEO Ted Sarandos, who he called a “fantastic man.” Later, he said that neither Paramount nor Netflix were “great friends” of his. As the corporate takeover saga unfolds, who will be revealed next as friend or enemy?

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.