Connect with us

Sports

The Los Angeles Browns Almost Came To Life 84 Years Ago Today

Published

on


The declaration of war stopped the relocation.

In a vastly different world, Major League Baseball’s Los Angeles Browns franchise would have won the 2025 World Series beating some team from the National League. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941. The American League’s St. Louis Browns franchise was headed to Los Angeles with a vote on moving Don Barnes’ franchise scheduled for December 8th. America declared war on December 8th on Japan. What if Barnes did move his Browns to Los Angeles, would have Major League Baseball hastened its westward movement? The American League and the National League each had eight teams, but the New York Yankees shared the market with two other teams, the National League’s Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants. Philadelphia was a two-team town with the American League’s A’s and the National League’s Phillies. Boston had two teams, the American League’s Red Sox and the National League’s Braves. Chicago had the Cubs and White Sox. St. Louis had the National League’s Cardinals and the American League’s Browns. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Detroit, Pittsburgh and Washington had just one team. Major League Baseball was a Northeast and Midwest league. Moving to Los Angeles would have created problems. Teams travelled by train but Barnes worked out a deal with TWA to fly players in and out of Los Angeles along with the Chicago to Los Angeles Santa Fe Railroad.

Cardinals ownership was willing to give Barnes a $250,000 parting gift  , which would be $5 million today. Barnes was going to buy the Pacific Coast League’s Los Angeles Angels and move the team to Long Beach, California. The team would have used Los Angeles’ Wrigley Field. The baseball owners met in Chicago and everyone including Barnes voted against the move. The Browns’ franchise ended up in Baltimore in 1954. Walter O’Malley took his Brooklyn Dodgers business to LA in 1957.

Evan Weiner’s books are available at iTunes – https://books.apple.com/us/author/evan-weiner/id595575191

Evan can be reached at evan_weiner@hotmail.com

The Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor ended the planned move of the St. Louis Browns to LA





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

The NBA Will Expand Into Europe

Published

on


The NBA seems to be more interested in expanding to Europe and forming a league than to Seattle

The NBA wants 12 cities to house permanent franchises.

The National Basketball Association appears to be ready to expand by 2027. But it will not happen in the United States, Canada or Mexico. Instead, there will be a startup league in Europe. The NBA is targeting a 16 team circuit and has 12 cities in mind. London and Manchester in England, Paris and Lyon in France, Barcelona and Madrid in Spain, Milan and Rome in Spain, Berlin and Munich in Germany and Athens, Greece and Istanbul, Turkey. The NBA has not officially signed any deals yet. In terms of expanding the 30 team NBA to 32, nothing seems imminent with Las Vegas and Seattle available and there has not been any mention of Mexico City joining the league even though the NBA recently played its annual Mexico game.

The International Basketball Federation or FIBA, the governing body of global basketball, is helping the NBA form a European league. There could be a problem though. There is an established European league. The Euroleague has been around in one form or another since 1958 and has 18 teams. The NBA is aiming for a league that will also try to maximize the commercial potential of basketball in Europe while honoring the European basketball traditions. The NBA also has a problem that was not anticipated. American tariffs. The European Union’s reaction to the levies has not been favorable to the United States. Will Europeans be open to an American business coming to the continent under present conditions and sentiments? Madrid, Barcelona, Athens are taken but there are plenty of other basketball markets in Europe that are open although the NBA could poach some of those teams in The Euroleague to join its new league. The NBA is in the business of making money and if it pushes out the EuroLeague to do so, so be it.

Evan Weiner’s books are available at iTunes – https://books.apple.com/us/author/evan-weiner/id595575191

Evan can be reached at evan_weiner@hotmail.com

The NBA will go head to head with the Euroleaague.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

How Much Clubs in Europe’s Top Leagues Spend on Wages and What Share Each Team Covers

Published

on


Matheus Cunha has racked up high transfer fees

Teams’ annual wages vary from €2.29 million at Telstar to Real Madrid’s €309.6 million

Player wage spending across Europe’s biggest leagues has never been higher, and the way those salaries are distributed within each competition shapes the balance of power as much as the total amounts. From England to the Netherlands, the gap between clubs at the top and bottom of each championship has turned wage tables into a map of who can realistically compete for trophies and who is fighting simply to keep up. The latest Sportingpedia report uses data from Capology to examine first team base wages in the Premier League, La Liga, Serie A, the Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Liga Portugal and the Eredivisie for the 2025/26 season.

We compare total wage bills by league, measure how much of each total is controlled by individual clubs, and track the ratios between the highest and lowest spenders in every competition to show where wage spending is most concentrated and where it is more evenly spread.

The headline finding is that the Premier League sits alone at the top with just over €2.40 billion euros in salaries. That is about 66% more than La Liga’s €1.45 billion and more than twice the totals in the Bundesliga and Serie A, while England also has the flattest internal profile, with a little over four to one between its richest and poorest clubs. At the opposite end, other leagues have far steeper internal divides, with wage gaps stretching beyond ten to one and, in the Eredivisie, past fifteen to one between their biggest and smallest payers.

Total and Average Club Wages
in Europe’s Top 7 Leagues for 2025/26 Season

Total and Average Club Wages in Europe

Data Source: Capology.com

Key Takeaways:

  • The Premier League leads Europe in player salaries, spending €2.41 billion – 65% more than La Liga, the second-highest
  • Real Madrid (€305.4 million), Bayern Munich (€257.4 million), and Manchester City (€255.3 million) pay the highest salaries in football
  • Six clubs spent more than 200 million in annual salaries: Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich, PSG, Manchester City, and Arsenal
  • Nineteen European clubs pay over €100 million in wages; nine are from the Premier League
  • No Portuguese or Dutch club matches Brentford’s €62.5 million wage bill – the lowest in England’s top flight
  • In the Premier League, Manchester City pay 10.48% of the league’s wage bill, while Brentford sit at just 2.56%
  • In La Liga, Real Madrid command 21.35% of all salaries, with Levante on only 1.73%
  • In Serie A, Inter account for 11.61% of the total, whereas Lecce stand at 1.67%
  • In the Bundesliga, Bayern Munich shoulder 21.53% of all wages, while Heidenheim contribute just 2.11%
  • In Ligue 1, PSG control 20.99% of the wage bill, as Le Havre remain on only 2.15%
  • In Liga Portugal, Benfica hold 19.85% of all salaries, compared to Alvercas 1.57%
  • In the Eredivisie, PSV lead with a 17.09% share of annual wages, while Telstar sit at just 1.12%

Premier League 2025/26: First Team Base Wages

Premier League 2025/25

Data Source: Capology.com

No league in world football spends more on player wages than the Premier League, but within England’s top flight the gulf between the top and bottom remains stark. Manchester City lead the way, committing €251.74 million in salaries for 2025/26 – 10.48% of the entire league’s €2,402,536,808 wage bill. Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea, Manchester United and Tottenham round out the traditional “big six”, each dedicating around or well over €150 million to player wages, and together accounting for just under half (about 49%) of the division’s total payroll. Aston Villa and Newcastle are the only other sides exceeding the €130 million mark, a threshold the majority of Premier League clubs cannot reach.

In stark contrast, Brentford spend €61.49 million – barely a quarter of City’s outlay and just 2.56% of the league-wide total. Burnley, Leeds and Brighton all sit between 2.64% and 2.86%, while Bournemouth’s €71.07 million gives them 2.96%. Sunderland and Crystal Palace each hover just above 3.2% of the wage bill, with Wolverhampton, Everton and Fulham clustered between 3.4% and 3.7%. Nottingham Forest’s €105.83 million, equal to 4.40% of the total, marks the last club above €100 million. The seven lowest-paying clubs combined still fall short of matching City’s wage bill. Despite this imbalance, the ratio between the top and bottom payers in England remains far lower than in Spain, Germany or the Netherlands, where the leading clubs typically control more than one fifth of all salaries.

La Liga 2025/26: First Team Base Wages

La Liga 2025/26

Data Source: Capology.com

Real Madrid are the undisputed paymasters of Spanish and European football, committing €309.57 million to first team base salaries for 2025/26 – more than 21% of the entire league’s €1,450,295,000 wage bill and over €87 million clear of their historic rivals Barcelona, whose €222.04 million payroll still places them comfortably in second on 15.31% of the total. Atletico Madrid rank third at €157.29 million (10.85%), a figure that stands apart from the rest of the league but is roughly half of Real Madrid’s outlay. Together, Spain’s big three clubs account for 47.5% of all La Liga salaries.

Beyond the established giants, only Athletic Bilbao (€84.55 million) and Betis (€75.99 million) exceed the €70 million mark, holding 5.83% and 5.24% of league wages respectively. Clubs such as Villarreal, Real Sociedad and Sevilla operate in the €65–70 million range, each controlling between 4.49% and 4.82% of the total and forming a clear second tier. The drop-off from there is steep: Girona, Valencia and Celta Vigo all spend less than €51 million on wages and sit between 2.70% and 3.45% of league salaries, while Mallorca, Getafe and Rayo Vallecano each fall below 2.5%. At the very bottom, Oviedo, Osasuna, Elche, Espanyol, Alaves and Levante each allocate less than €31 million to first-team salaries, with shares ranging from 1.73% to 2.10% – barely a tenth of what Los Blancos pay. The combined wage bills of the eight lowest-spending clubs do not match Real Madrid’s single payroll, underlining how dominant the giants of Spanish football remain both in absolute terms and as a share of the total wages paid in La Liga.

Serie A 2025/26: First Team Base Wages

Serie A 2025/26: First Team Base Wages

Data Source: Capology.com

Inter top Serie A’s wage table for 2025/26, committing €136.2 million to salaries – more than any other club in Italy and accounting for 11.61% of the entire league’s €1,172,640,000 payroll. Their nearest rivals, Juventus and Napoli, follow with €125.82 million (10.73%) and €112.2 million (9.57%) respectively, with Roma not far behind on €109.09 million (9.30%). Collectively, the five biggest spenders (Inter, Juventus, Napoli, Roma, Milan) are responsible for €578.01 million – just under half (around 49.3%) of all salaries paid out in Serie A. Milan’s €94.7 million gives them 8.08% of the league total and completes a tightly packed top five.

At the other end of the scale, Lecce and Pisa are the league’s lowest spenders, allocating €19.55 million and €19.84 million respectively, with Udinese and Parma just above the €25 million mark. Their shares range from 1.67% to 2.24% of the total, highlighting how thinly resources are spread at the bottom. Genoa, Verona and Cagliari also sit in the lower band, with wage bills between €28.99 million and €30.19 million and shares of 2.47% to 2.57%. The gap between Inter and the lowest spender, Lecce, stands at €116.65 million – a financial gulf of nearly seven to one that mirrors the on-field disparity in resources. Inter’s wage bill alone is more than the combined salaries of the six lowest-spending clubs in Serie A, underlining the sharp divide between Italy’s elite and its strugglers and putting Serie A closer to Spain and Germany than to the relatively flatter profile seen in England.

Bundesliga 2025/26: First Team Base Wages

Bundesliga 2025/26:  First Team Base Wages

Data Source: Capology.com

Bayern Munich are the Bundesliga’s highest wage payers by a considerable margin, with a salary bill of €257.58 million – 21.53% of the league’s €1,196,550,000 total. Their outlay is more than double that of Borussia Dortmund, who are next on the list with €123.75 million (10.34%), and comfortably ahead of RB Leipzig (€92.28 million, 7.71%) and Bayer Leverkusen (€91.68 million, 7.66%). Eintracht Frankfurt’s €64.13 million gives them 5.36% of the total. The combined salaries of the top five spenders (Bayern, Dortmund, Leipzig, Leverkusen, Frankfurt) amount to €629.42 million, covering more than half (around 52.6%) of all wages paid in the division.

At the other end of the spectrum, St Pauli and Heidenheim have the lowest salary commitments in the Bundesliga, each spending just over €25 million. Heidenheim’s €25.22 million accounts for 2.11% of the league total, while St Pauli’s €25.42 million makes up 2.12%. Clubs such as Koln, Union Berlin, Augsburg, Mainz, Hamburger and Werder Bremen operate between €34.08 million and €44.32 million, with shares in the 2.85% to 3.70% range. The difference between Bayern Munich and the lowest spender, Heidenheim, is an extraordinary €232.36 million, and Bayern’s wage bill is more than ten times larger. It is also greater than the combined total of the eight lowest-spending clubs in the league. This extreme concentration of salary spending at the very top helps to explain Bayern’s long-term dominance in German football and places the Bundesliga alongside La Liga among Europe’s most top-heavy leagues in percentage terms.

Ligue 1 2025/26: First Team Base Wages

Ligue 1 2025/26:  First Team Base Wages

Data Source: Capology.com

Paris Saint-Germain are the dominant financial force in Ligue 1, with a wage bill of €174.79 million for the 2025/26 season – an amount that represents 20.99% of the entire league total of €832,840,000. The gulf between PSG and their nearest competitors is striking: Marseille, the second-highest spenders, pay €95.42 million (11.46% of the total), just over half of PSG’s outlay, while Monaco follow in third at €62.22 million (7.47%). The three biggest spenders together account for almost 40% of all salaries paid in Ligue 1, reflecting an extraordinary concentration of resources at the very top.

At the opposite end of the table, Le Havre and Angers are among the league’s lowest spenders, with annual wage bills of €17.87 million and €17.98 million, each worth a little over 2.1% of the league total. Auxerre, on €19.42 million, holds 2.33%. Lorient, Metz and Toulouse sit slightly higher, between €21.6 million and €23.73 million, but still remain below 2.9% of the total each. This means that PSG commit almost 10 times more to player wages than the smallest clubs, with the gap between the top and bottom standing at around €156.9 million. The wage bill of PSG alone is higher than the combined salaries of several of the league’s lowest-paying sides. Such disparities highlight how Ligue 1 remains one of Europe’s most polarised top flights, with financial power heavily concentrated in Paris and only a handful of clubs capable of approaching that level of investment.

Liga Portugal 2025/26: First Team Base Wages

Liga Portugal 2025/26:  First Team Base Wages

Data Source: Capology.com

Benfica top the wage rankings in Liga Portugal, committing €42.48 million to player salaries in 2025/26 – an amount that accounts for 19.85% of the entire league’s €213,985,000 outlay. Their nearest rivals, Sporting Lisbon and Porto, follow with wage bills of €33.18 million (15.51%) and €30.91 million (14.44%) respectively. Together, the three traditional giants are responsible for €106.57 million – almost half (49.8%) of all salary spending in the league. Braga, with €16.5 million in wages and a 7.71% share, are the only other side to surpass €10 million, underlining the steep drop-off after the top three.

Rio Ave and Estoril, at €9.69 million and €9.51 million, each carry just over 4.4% of league salaries, while Casa Pia and Famalicao, with €8.39 million and €7.71 million, sit between 3.60% and 3.92%. Arouca, Nacional, Santa Clara, Vitoria, Moreirense, Estrela Amadora, Gil Vicente and Avs all spend between €5.31 million and €6.45 million and hold shares from 2.48% to 3.01%. At the very bottom of the Portuguese top flight, Tondela and Alverca post wage bills of €3.86 million and €3.37 million, responsible for 1.80% and 1.57% of league salaries. Benfica’s spending is more than twelve times higher than Alverca’s and the gap between the highest and lowest payers reaches €39.11 million. In percentage terms, the difference between top and bottom payers in Portugal is wider than in Serie A or Ligue 1 and close to the ratios seen in La Liga and the Bundesliga. The data highlights just how pronounced the financial divide is in Portugal’s top flight, with the top three clubs maintaining a huge advantage over the rest of the competition despite operating at a much lower absolute level than their counterparts in England, Spain or Germany.

Eredivisie 2025/26: First Team Base Wages

Eredevisie 2025/26:  First Team Base Wages

Data Source: Capology.com

PSV lead the Eredivisie in player salary spending, allocating €35.07 million in 2025/26 – a figure that amounts to 17.09% of the league’s total wage bill of €205,160,000. Ajax are close behind, with €32.73 million (15.95%), followed by Feyenoord on €25.75 million (12.55%). Collectively, these three clubs are responsible for €93.55 million in wages and 45.6% of all salaries paid in the Dutch top flight, underlining their financial dominance and the dependence of the league on a small group of traditional giants.

Beyond the big three, Utrecht (€14.42 million, 7.03%), AZ and Twente (each €12.03 million, 5.86%) are the only other clubs spending over €10 million on wages. NEC Nijmegen and Fortuna Sittard, on €9.66 million and €9.35 million, each account for around 4.6–4.7% of the total, while PEC Zwolle, Sparta Rotterdam and NAC Breda sit between €6.9 million and €7.28 million, with shares from 3.36% to 3.55%. Heerenveen, Heracles and Groningen operate in the €5.03–6.44 million range, corresponding to roughly 2.45% to 3.14% of league salaries, while Go Ahead Eagles and Excelsior each spend just under €5 million and carry around 2.42–2.43%.

At the bottom of the scale, Volendam pay €3.02 million (1.47% of the total) and Telstar just €2.29 million (1.12%). PSV’s outlay is more than fifteen times higher than Telstar’s, creating a gap of €32.78 million between the league’s highest and lowest spenders. The numbers reinforce the clear financial hierarchy in Dutch football, where the traditional giants and a handful of challengers are well ahead of the rest, and where the internal wage gap – measured in relative terms – is now the widest of any of Europe’s top seven leagues.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Notre Dame has a right to be upset

Published

on


Notre Dame 2025 Season Preview: Irish Poised for Another Playoff Push

By: Matthew Weatherby

Ever since about 12:45 yesterday afternoon, Notre Dame and its fans have been under fire. While there have been many fans who have been hyperbolic in terms of where the team stood this season. At the core of their frustration, there is one absolute truth: Notre Dame got screwed.

SPORTS TALK GEORGIA

SPORTS TALK FLORIDA

A Miami Acknowledgement

Before I get into the case of Notre Dame, I want to preface that, at the core, I do not have a problem with Miami being in over Notre Dame. In fact, when you look at the numbers, it appears that the committee made the right choice.

But, much like with Lane Kiffin, it is not the decision itself. But, the process of how it was reached.

The Politics of it

The playoff was not designed to get 2 G6 teams into the field. As much as everyone loved the model of inclusion when the playoffs expanded, people seem none too pleased with it when it comes time for the final ranking, and their team is on the outside looking in. It felt like the committee was put in a spot where they could not exclude one of the power conferences. I am of the belief that if Virginia had beaten Duke Saturday, we would be sitting here talking about a rematch of the game played week 2 in South Bend.

But that last sentence plays more into the politics of this. While they are not supposed to care about rematches, and to an extent, they don’t. It is hard to believe that the committee didn’t look at that potential rematch and see their bracket consist of 3 rematches in 4 of the first round games. For reference, Alabama and Oklahoma are a rematch, as well as Tulane and Ole Miss.

It feels as simple as this: the committee has to answer to the conferences. It is the same reason that Alabama did not move after Saturday’s result. So an SEC championship game participant was never going to be punished for the extra game, and the committee couldn’t really afford to leave the ACC out.

Why Notre Dame fans should be mad

Notre Dame dropped two spots in two weeks. Surely they must have done something to deserve it, right? Wrong over the last two weeks Notre Dame went on the road and beat Stanford by 29 points. Ok the the teams that jumped them must’ve done something much more notable, right? Wrong again. Alabama survived against Auburn and got shelled in the SEC Championship, while Miami piled it on late against Pitt on the road and rooted for Duke in the ACC Title game. There was nothing to justify the movement other than politics and realizing they had messed up earlier in the ranking process.

You got the rug pulled out from under you, Notre Dame. Plain and simple. People are upset about Notre Dame not playing in a bowl game, and I get their point as well. But the committee failed Notre Dame because they failed as a group. If they had actually adhered to their OWN Guidelines that were created, then this wouldn’t be an issue. But Hunter Yurachek and whatever clown show that assembled in Grapevine, Texas, failed for weeks to do so. For weeks, no less.

The Committee’s Failure

These teams are supposed to be viewed in groups, and yet somehow, despite being in the same group as Miami for weeks, the committee failed to move them ahead of Notre Dame until the ACC was not getting a team in. If they do this correctly and again follow THEIR OWN RULES, then Notre Dame and its fans may not like it, but they would be more in the Texas and Vanderbilt camp in terms of the reaction.

None of that happened, so instead, you have two teams that did not play last Saturday swap places. All the while, Hunter Yurachek continues to make it up as he goes in every interview he does with ESPN. I mean, for God’s sake, when Rece Davis pressed him on the reasoning as to the timing of the switch and why it was Miami instead of Notre Dame, it was like he was reading it off a script.

This is where the anger should be. The room is full of 12 people who have to have next to no accountability for the decisions that they make on a weekly basis. There are no questions that have to be answered. You saw that throughout the weekend. Yurachek went on gameday and gave answers that were just a word salad that amounted to nothing. He followed it up with a similar performance yesterday after the rankings were announced.

No one will ever get peace on this process until there is some accountability from the committee. For as long as there isn’t any accountability, the committee can just kind of do what they please.

Notre Dame and Conferences

Notre Dame will not be joining a conference following this result. I know people have hypothesized that a result like this would be the breaking point for Notre Dame and that it would lead them to join a conference it won’t. They get a significant financial benefit from not being in a conference. Notre Dame also has an agreement where, starting next year, if they are in the top 12 in the final ranking, they are guaranteed a spot in the playoff. Kind of like a conference champion.

Notre Dame’s athletic director did say today that there has been some damage done to their relationship with the ACC. Which is understandable, considering it felt like they were running a presidential campaign against them getting into the playoffs.

Final note on the bowl game absence. People view it as pouting and weak. I think it is due to the way in which they were left out, along with the current college football calendar. Why would I go play in the Cheez-It Bowl when I can worry about recruiting, roster retention, and staff changes?





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.