Connect with us

Business

68% of parents with children under 6 say their kids need a ‘detox’ from technology. Here’s why that’s scary, say experts

Published

on



The combination of kids and too much screen time comes with no shortage of worries: cognitive delays, executive functioning issues, and higher rates of depression, anxiety, and insomnia are all associated with letting little eyes on smartphones, tablets, or other screens too early and too often. 

Still, the research—as well as dire warnings, issued by everyone from the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry to social psychologist and author Jonathan Haidt, who pleads for no smartphones before high school—still goes ignored by many parents. 

Sixty percent, in fact, say their children started using technology before they could read, according to the findings of a Harris Poll commissioned by Bright Horizons, the national early education company. And nearly three-quarters (73%) admit their children could use a “detox” from technology, including 68% of parents with kids under 6. 

Screen time recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says it should be extremely limited for children under 2, and then only if co-viewed with an adult who can talk and teach alongside the program. “Children younger than 2 learn and grow when they explore the physical world around them. Their minds learn best when they interact and play with parents, siblings, caregivers, and other children and adults,” the guidance notes. 

For those 2 to 5, meanwhile, screen use should be limited to an hour a day, and should mostly (or only) consist of two-way video chats or an educational show like Sesame Street. 

But according to data from Common Sense Media, kids under 2 are watching just over an hour a day, while kids 2-4 are watching for two hours and eight minutes daily.

Why aren’t parents heeding the warnings, particularly since 49% say they are concerned for their children’s mental health, according to the Bright Horizons report, and 42% worry about the amount of screen time their kids engage in?

Part of it appears to be desperation—as 55% of parents said they use screens as a bargaining chip to get their kids to do chores or homework, while an even higher percentage (58%) say they often rely on screens to keep their children quiet while shopping or dining out. 

Also, as psychologist Becky Kennedy, aka Dr. Becky, previously told Fortune, this is uncharted territory.  “I don’t think parenting has ever come naturally,” she says. “But the idea that parenting would be natural in a digital world with all of this stuff available to our kids is at best a joke—and at worst, a way to purposely make parents feel awful about themselves.” She stressed that parents should not beat them themselves up over it all. And the more we are immersed in our own phones, she explained, the harder it is for us to set boundaries for our kids.

Still, said Kennedy, who partnered with Haidt to create a guide for parents looking for help with kids and screen time, the potential cost of not setting such boundaries “has never been higher.” 

It’s why Rachel Robertson, Bright Horizons Chief Academic Officer, finds the new survey’s findings so worrisome, and stresses that it’s important to “think about playing the long game” when it comes to child development.

Risks with too-early, too-much screen time for little kids

“We are helping these little people develop the foundation they need for the rest of their lives,” Robertson says. “They are going to be future adults. What do children need now in their development, in the amazing first five years of life, that will prepare them to thrive for the rest of their life? Screens do not add to any of that early development—and in fact, they can really detract from it, and we can’t get that time back.”

For example, says Robertson, an early-education expert, if you take your little kid to the grocery store and they are starting to fuss while sitting in the shopping cart, you might give them a screen as a distraction. “It certainly helps them, in the moment, to calm down. But long-term, they have missed an opportunity to develop regulation skills, to manage emotions, and to build their executive function to persist through waiting times,” she explains. 

Providing that easy out with a screen, she says, does not build the foundational cognitive and social emotional skills they need and which they will rely on for the rest of their lives. Doing it once or twice is not a big deal, she says—but using a screen as a distraction every time at the store “will have a significant developmental impact for children.” She also points to the work of Haidt, who highlights a range of studies showing that anxiety and other social, emotional, and mental health issues, particularly in teens, are related to long-term screen use.

A body of science supports that, in order to develop cognitive, language, and other skills, young children need to experience the world hands-on, explains Robertson, such as through playing with toys or interacting with caregivers. Watching screens leaves them less available to interact or hear words, raising the possibility of language, cognitive, or social delays, found a recent study

Another study found that preschoolers who had more screen time than recommended by the APA had lower development in the part of the brain supporting language and early literacy skills, while yet another found the more time a 1-year-old spent watching screens, the more likely they would have communication and problem-solving delays at ages 2 to 4. 

Below, Robertson offers tips about how parents can begin to rely less on devices with their kids.

Be intentional

One problem Robertson has witnessed is what she calls a “lack of intentionality.” When there are screens built into grocery carts and the back of taxis and the seats of airplanes, she says—or even in your hand as you simultaneously scroll and hold your kid—“you can very easily have your child exposed to an incredible amount of screen time without making intentional decisions about it. You actually have to make intentional decisions for them not to be exposed to it.” 

And it just takes a bit of creativity to avoid screens with your little one, she says—like gathering an interesting array of knicknacks, like plastic bottles, action figures, and paper and crayons, into a bag to keep in the car. “Then, when you have to wait somewhere, that special bag comes out, and you can see what creative things can happen,” she says. “There’s a reason kids like the cardboard box” instead of the toy, she adds. “It’s so open-ended and creative.”

Another simple trick is to just have a couple little old-fashioned games that you initiate when needed—“Simon Says” or a color or shape hunt or “I Spy” contest when you’re in a supermarket or in the car or a waiting room, for example. And don’t forget books. 

“Children really like repetition, like with the same book over and over again,” she says. “They love to be able to start to predict. They build confidence from that. They feel safe from that, and their imagination can explore from that.”

Help kids use screens for specific purposes

Robertson is not saying to never let your kid use a screen again. But how it’s used is important, she stresses.

Let’s say you’re rushing to cook dinner after a frazzled day at work. While getting your kid involved with measuring ingredients is a great way to engage them, it might be too much for the moment. Instead, let them use a screen to find something out—to discover a recipe for spaghetti sauce, for example. The assignment will not only keep them busy while you chop, it’ll actually be helpful with its answer.

“Then they’re researching and they’re critical thinkers, using technology for a purpose, and then they can contribute,” she says. “So that’s a great use of technology, and I think it allows them to still use it—not as an entertainment device, but as a tool. And that’s really what all technology should be: a tool.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

How to watch, stream the NCAA Championship Game live online free without cable, on CBS

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Stocks closed mixed in most volatile session since the pandemic as Wall Street is ‘starting to find a bottom’

Published

on



  • President Donald Trump’s announcement of sweeping “reciprocal tariffs” caught investors completely off-guard last week, but news of negotiations and an erroneous report about a 90-day pause might have given traders some hope. Meanwhile, hedge funds may have supported share prices as they covered their short positions.  

Markets are gyrating like it’s 2020 all over again as investors continue to reckon with President Donald Trump’s sweeping “reciprocal tariffs,” resulting in Wall Street’s most volatile session since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Stocks initially fell further Monday before some Big Tech names led a measured recovery. The S&P 500 plunged into bear market territory to start the day, dropping 20% from the index’s mid-February high, before erasing most of those losses to close down 0.23% for the session. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite followed a similar pattern, finishing with a 0.1% gain, while the Dow Jones fell about 350 points after ending last week with back-to-back losses of 1,500 points or more for the first time in its history. 

Markets simply weren’t prepared for the protectionist measures Trump unveiled in the White House Rose Garden on Wednesday, said Jay Hatfield, the CEO of Infrastructure Capital Advisors. A blanket 10% tariff went into effect on Saturday, but most imports are set to be taxed much higher if those goods come from countries that have trade deficits with the U.S. 

“What we call the ‘chart of death’ was completely unexpected,” said Hatfield, who manages ETFs and a series of hedge funds. 

However, Hatfield noted stocks didn’t do a straight nosedive Monday as administration officials claimed more than 50 countries have called the White House to negotiate, even if reports of a 90-day tariff pause proved to be erroneous. When the S&P moved below 5,000, just over a month after surging above the 6,100 mark, it triggered a natural support level for the index, he said. 

“We’re starting to find a bottom,” Hatfield said. “But that doesn’t mean the bottom is not 4,800 or 4,600.” 

Ironically, share prices might have also gotten a boost because uncertainty remains high. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, briefly moved above 50 several times throughout the session. Popularly known as Wall Street’s “fear gauge,” the index is derived from the prices of S&P 500 options and is experiencing its highest sustained spike since the pandemic.

Hatfield said this heightened volatility signals hedge funds have, fittingly, ensured they are well hedged by buying puts, or options contracts that give investors the right to sell an underlying asset—in this case, the S&P 500 futures contracts—at a predetermined price. 

Exercising those options is profitable when the value of the index drops below the option’s “strike price.” When volatility is high, however, traders have incentive to unwind these positions to ensure they make money before stocks possibly rebound. 

“It’s actually one good thing about hedge funds,” Hatfield said. “They are the ones doing the buying that causes the market to stabilize.” 

For example, Hatfield’s small hedge fund loaded up on S&P 500 puts Friday morning before liquidating them on Monday, which he could do because his long exposure to the index was limited. 

“If you never cover your shorts,” he said, “you never make money.” 

Chip stocks rally, but Apple and Nike fall 

Tariff uncertainty created several winners and losers Monday. Popular chip stocks rallied, with shares of bull market darlings Nvidia and Broadcom jumping 3.5% and 5.4%, respectively. Amazon and Meta also helped lead the way for America’s tech giants, with both stocks climbing more than 2%. 

But Dollar Tree outpaced all those companies as one of the day’s biggest winners. About half of the discount chain’s products will be subject to tariffs, analysts from Citi said, but the stock rose 8% as they suggested the company could raise prices without much pushback from consumers. 

For other major names, however, Monday offered little respite. Apple shares have shed nearly a fifth of their value since Wednesday, with the stock declining 3.7% for the session. The iPhone maker relies heavily on China, which has been hit by a 54% tariff that Trump said will see another 50% duty tacked on if Beijing does not withdraw its own retaliatory measures. 

It’s a similar story for Nike, which produces most of its apparel in India and other countries in Southeast Asia, which were also hit with heavy tariffs. Shares of Stellantis, Ford, and other automakers also continued to decline as the industry wrestled with a 25% tariff on all foreign cars and parts.  

Investors did not necessarily flock to all types of safe haven assets, however. Treasuries sold off as the 10-year yield moved up over 20 basis points to 4.20%, and the price of gold also fell. 

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Microsoft workers say they’ve been fired after 50th anniversary protest over Israel contract

Published

on

Microsoft has fired two employees who interrupted the company’s 50th anniversary celebration to protest its work supplying artificial intelligence technology to the Israeli military, according to a group representing the workers.

Microsoft didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Monday.

The protests began Friday when Microsoft software engineer Ibtihal Aboussad walked up to a stage where an executive was announcing new product features and a long-term vision for Microsoft’s AI ambitions.

“You claim that you care about using AI for good but Microsoft sells AI weapons to the Israeli military,” Aboussad shouted at Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman. “Fifty-thousand people have died and Microsoft powers this genocide in our region.”

The protest forced Suleyman to pause his talk, which was livestreamed from Microsoft’s campus in Redmond, Washington. Among the participants at the 50th anniversary of Microsoft’s founding were co-founder Bill Gates and former CEO Steve Ballmer.

“Thank you for your protest, I hear you,” Suleyman said. Aboussad continued, shouting that Suleyman and “all of Microsoft” had blood on their hands. She also threw onto the stage a keffiyeh scarf, which has become a symbol of support for Palestinian people, before being escorted out of the event.

A second protester, Microsoft employee Vaniya Agrawal, interrupted a later part of the event.

Aboussad was invited on Monday to a video call with a human resources representative at which she was told she was being terminated immediately. Agrawal was notified over email, according to the advocacy group No Azure for Apartheid, which has protested the sale of Microsoft’s Azure cloud computing platform to Israel.

An investigation by The Associated Press revealed earlier this year that AI models from Microsoft and OpenAI had been used as part of an Israeli military program to select bombing targets during the recent wars in Gaza and Lebanon. The story also contained details of an errant Israeli airstrike in 2023 that struck a vehicle carrying members of a Lebanese family, killing three young girls and their grandmother.

In February, five Microsoft employees were ejected from a meeting with CEO Satya Nadella for protesting the contracts.

“We provide many avenues for all voices to be heard,” said a statement from the company Friday. “Importantly, we ask that this be done in a way that does not cause a business disruption. If that happens, we ask participants to relocate. We are committed to ensuring our business practices uphold the highest standards.”

Microsoft had declined to say Friday whether it was taking further action. Aboussad told the AP she lost access to her work accounts shortly after the protest and had not been able to log back in.

Dozens of Google workers were fired last year after internal protests surrounding a contract that the technology company has with the Israeli government. Employee sit-ins at Google offices in New York and Sunnyvale, California were targeting a $1.2 billion deal known as Project Nimbus providing AI technology to the Israeli government.

The Google workers later filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board in an attempt to get their jobs back.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.